United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service ISSN: 0884- 6413 Vegetables 2017 Summary February 2018 Contents Vegetable Highlights............................................................................................... 7 Leading Vegetable States in 2017................................................................................... 7 Principal Fresh Market Vegetable Area Planted and Harvested, Utilized Production, and Value - United States: 2015................................................................................................ 8 Principal Processing Vegetable Area Planted and Harvested, Utilized Production, and Value by Crop - United States: 2015................................................................................................ 9 Principal Vegetable Area Planted and Harvested, Total Production, Utilized Production, and Value of Utilized Production by Crop - United States: 2016-2017...................................................................... 10 Principal Vegetable Area Planted and Harvested, Total Production, Utilized Production, and Value of Utilized Production by Crop - United States: 2016-2017 (continued).......................................................... 11 Principal Fresh Market Vegetable Area Planted and Harvested, Utilized Production and Value - States and United States: 2015................................................................................................ 12 Principal Processing Vegetable Area Planted and Harvested, Utilized Production and Value - States and United States: 2015................................................................................................ 13 Principal Vegetable Area Planted and Harvested, Total Production, Utilized Production, and Value of Utilized Production - States and United States: 2016-2017................................................................... 14 Principal Vegetable Area Planted and Harvested, Total Production, Utilized Production, and Value of Utilized Production - States and United States: 2016-2017 (continued)....................................................... 15 Artichokes for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017................................................................................ 16 Artichoke Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017........................ 17 Asparagus for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017................................................................................ 18 Asparagus Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017........................ 19 Green Lima Beans for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017........................................................................ 20 Green Lima Bean Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017.................. 22 Snap Beans for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017................................................................................ 24 Snap Bean Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017........................ 27 Broccoli for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017................................................................................ 30 Broccoli Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017......................... 31 Cabbage for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017................................................................................ 32 Cabbage Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017.......................... 34 Cantaloupes for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017................................................................................ 36 Cantaloupe Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017....................... 38 Carrots for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017................................................................................ 40 Carrot Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017........................... 42 Cauliflower for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017................................................................................ 43 Cauliflower Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017...................... 44 Celery for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017....................................................................................... 45 Celery Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017........................... 46 Sweet Corn for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017................................................................................ 47 Sweet Corn Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017....................... 51 Cucumbers for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017................................................................................ 54 Cucumber Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017......................... 57 Garlic for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017....................................................................................... 59 Garlic Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017........................... 60 Honeydew for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017................................................................................ 61 Honeydew Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017......................... 62 Head Lettuce for Fresh Market Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017........................................................................................... 63 Leaf Lettuce for Fresh Market Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017........................................................................................... 64 Romaine Lettuce for Fresh Market Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017........................................................................................... 65 Onions for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value by Season - States and United States: 2015............................................................................ 66 Summer Storage Onion Shrinkage and Loss - States and United States: 2015........................................... 67 Onion Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, Value, and Shrinkage and Loss - States and United States: 2016-2017........................................................................................... 68 Onion Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017............................ 69 Green Peas for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017................................................................................ 71 Green Pea Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017........................ 73 Bell Peppers for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017................................................................................ 75 Bell Pepper Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017...................... 76 Chile Peppers for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017.............................................................................. 78 Chile Pepper Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017..................... 79 Pumpkins for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017................................................................................ 80 Pumpkin Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017.......................... 82 Spinach for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017................................................................................ 84 Spinach Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017.......................... 86 Squash for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017................................................................................ 88 Squash Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017........................... 90 Strawberries for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017................................................................................ 92 Strawberry Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017....................... 93 Tomatoes for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017................................................................................ 95 Tomato Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017........................... 98 Watermelons for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017................................................................................ 100 Watermelon Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017....................... 102 Vegetable Comments................................................................................................. 104 Definition of Terms................................................................................................ 110 Price and Value Definitions........................................................................................ 110 Statistical Methodology............................................................................................ 112 Information Contacts............................................................................................... 112 Vegetable Highlights In 2017, the Nation's production for the 26 estimated vegetable and melon crops totaled 738 million cwt, 6 percent below the revised 785 million cwt in 2016. The utilized production totaled 729 million cwt, 6 percent below 2016. Area harvested in 2017 was 2.48 million acres, a 4 percent reduction from the previous year. In 2017, the top three vegetables, in terms of area harvested, were sweet corn, tomatoes, and snap beans. In terms of total production, the three largest crops were tomatoes, sweet corn, and onions, which combined accounted for 54 percent of the all vegetables total. The value of utilized production for 2017 vegetable crops was $13.8 billion, up 6 percent from the previous year. Tomatoes, head lettuce, and romaine lettuce claimed the highest values, accounting for 33 percent of the total value of production when combined. For the 26 selected vegetables and melons estimated in 2017, California continued to be the leading State in terms of area harvested, utilized production, and value of production. Florida was second and Minnesota ranked third in terms of area harvested. Washington and Arizona ranked second and third, respectively, in terms of utilized production; while Arizona and Florida ranked second and third, respectively, in terms of value of utilized production. The top three States accounted for 76 percent of the total value of utilized production when combined. Leading Vegetable States in 2017 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Area harvested : Utilized production : Value of utilized : : : : : production :----------------------------------------------------------------- Rank : : Percent : : Percent : : Percent : State : of total : State : of total : State : of total -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : 1 :California 39.1 California 57.3 California 56.7 : 2 :Florida 6.6 Washington 5.5 Arizona 12.1 : 3 :Minnesota 6.6 Arizona 5.0 Florida 7.6 : 4 :Wisconsin (D) Florida 5.0 Georgia 3.3 : 5 :Washington 6.2 Wisconsin (D) Washington 2.4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. Principal Fresh Market Vegetable Area Planted and Harvested, Utilized Production, and Value - United States: 2015 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Area planted : Area harvested : Utilized production : Value of : : : : utilized production Crop :--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2015 : 2015 : 2015 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ------------ acres ------------ 1,000 cwt 1,000 dollars : Artichokes 1/ ........: 6,800 6,800 918 80,600 Asparagus 1/ .........: 23,500 21,700 629 67,864 Beans, snap ..........: 77,680 71,170 3,952 234,934 Broccoli 1/ ..........: 126,400 124,400 21,888 1,058,770 Cabbage ..............: 59,530 55,920 20,178 389,340 Cantaloupes ..........: 53,750 52,100 13,552 264,131 Carrots ..............: 76,000 74,550 25,740 784,265 Cauliflower 1/ .......: 37,600 37,210 6,559 401,747 Celery 1/ ............: 28,100 27,700 17,110 424,664 Corn, sweet ..........: 242,090 229,090 27,952 787,581 : Cucumbers ............: 40,020 37,980 6,725 175,762 Garlic 1/ ............: 25,400 25,200 4,089 321,006 Honeydews ............: 14,500 14,400 3,769 85,343 Lettuce : Head ...............: 119,600 119,000 43,108 1,253,150 Leaf ...............: 56,400 55,100 14,233 850,238 Romaine ............: 87,600 87,000 26,335 1,046,571 Onions 1/ ............: 144,600 133,600 67,184 1,039,325 Peppers, bell 1/ .....: 41,900 40,900 15,155 732,699 Peppers, chile 1/ ....: 19,400 18,100 4,034 135,743 : Pumpkins 1/ ..........: 43,200 40,900 7,538 90,214 Spinach ..............: 41,890 41,190 6,076 343,575 Squash 1/ ............: 41,250 38,690 6,016 174,259 Tomatoes .............: 95,200 92,200 26,375 1,221,270 Watermelons ..........: 127,800 116,450 35,475 488,383 : Total ................: 1,630,210 1,561,350 404,590 12,451,434 : Strawberries 1/ ......: 58,950 58,010 30,655 2,239,301 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Includes processing total for dual usage crops. Principal Processing Vegetable Area Planted and Harvested, Utilized Production, and Value by Crop - United States: 2015 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Area planted : Area harvested : Utilized production : Value of : : : : utilized production Crop :--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2015 : 2015 : 2015 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ------------ acres ------------ tons 1,000 dollars : Beans, lima ..........: 29,780 29,200 50,255 29,950 Beans, snap ..........: 164,870 158,920 764,900 178,578 Carrots ..............: 11,600 11,020 294,000 36,095 Corn, sweet ..........: 325,100 307,500 2,488,110 255,480 Cucumbers ............: 87,460 85,110 533,460 172,715 Peas, green ..........: 181,200 166,200 411,320 131,568 Spinach ..............: 7,300 7,200 75,200 10,394 Tomatoes .............: 314,300 310,600 14,754,350 1,381,956 : Total ................: 1,121,610 1,075,750 19,371,595 2,196,736 : Asparagus ............: (X) (X) 7,750 12,778 Broccoli .............: (X) (X) 39,200 23,559 Cauliflower ..........: (X) (X) 2,400 1,152 : Total ................: (X) (X) 49,350 37,489 : Total all ............: (X) (X) 19,420,945 2,234,225 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (X) Not applicable. Principal Vegetable Area Planted and Harvested, Total Production, Utilized Production, and Value of Utilized Production by Crop - United States: 2016-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Area planted : Area harvested Crop :------------------------------------------------------- : 2016 : 2017 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : acres : Artichokes ............: 6,800 7,200 6,800 7,200 Asparagus .............: 25,600 24,700 23,700 23,300 Beans, lima ...........: 26,100 25,800 25,300 25,400 Beans, snap ...........: 249,300 225,000 236,000 214,600 Broccoli ..............: 132,300 130,500 131,300 129,400 Cabbage ...............: 60,000 62,000 57,600 59,600 Cantaloupes ...........: 59,300 58,000 58,000 57,050 Carrots ...............: 78,100 78,700 76,700 74,400 Cauliflower ...........: 40,000 43,100 40,000 42,200 Celery ................: 30,400 25,400 29,900 25,100 : Corn, sweet ...........: 513,000 503,000 494,200 483,100 Cucumbers .............: 125,400 125,800 119,800 123,600 Garlic ................: 30,100 33,000 30,100 33,000 Honeydews .............: 12,100 11,600 12,100 11,600 Lettuce : Head ................: 122,000 123,500 121,300 122,700 Leaf ................: 59,500 54,700 59,300 54,100 Romaine .............: 94,300 100,300 93,200 99,700 Onions ................: 141,600 143,200 135,700 138,000 Pea, green ............: 153,700 129,000 141,600 119,700 : Peppers, bell .........: 45,100 44,450 43,700 43,300 Peppers, chile ........: 20,900 20,000 20,000 18,900 Pumpkins ..............: 75,600 73,230 71,400 69,340 Spinach ...............: 55,000 54,150 53,700 53,030 Squash ................: 37,100 35,500 35,900 34,400 Tomatoes ..............: 357,300 322,100 351,500 311,500 Watermelons ...........: 118,200 115,300 112,400 107,900 : Total .................: 2,668,800 2,569,230 2,581,200 2,482,120 : Strawberries ..........: 53,900 54,100 53,060 52,700 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --continued Principal Vegetable Area Planted and Harvested, Total Production, Utilized Production, and Value of Utilized Production by Crop - United States: 2016-2017 (continued) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Total production : Utilized production : Value of utilized production Crop :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 2016 : 2017 : 2016 : 2017 : 2016 : 2017 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : -------------------- 1,000 cwt -------------------- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : Artichokes ............: 986.0 936.0 986.0 936.0 77,697 65,520 Asparagus .............: 745.2 671.2 745.0 669.9 80,496 73,127 Beans, lima ...........: 757.9 720.7 757.9 720.7 21,056 20,877 Beans, snap ...........: 19,985.0 18,031.8 19,965.5 17,986.1 399,415 337,777 Broccoli ..............: 22,466.0 20,392.0 22,466.0 20,392.0 846,595 926,165 Cabbage ...............: 23,048.0 23,490.5 23,048.0 23,463.1 455,838 428,724 Cantaloupes ...........: 14,973.3 13,822.3 14,973.3 13,819.5 257,517 267,305 Carrots ...............: 31,503.0 30,319.0 31,503.0 30,314.0 784,176 690,925 Cauliflower ...........: 7,177.5 8,414.0 7,177.5 8,391.8 398,094 386,951 Celery ................: 17,372.0 15,631.5 17,372.0 15,587.4 314,786 314,742 : Corn, sweet ...........: 75,560.1 79,265.7 75,560.1 78,949.2 892,301 931,631 Cucumbers .............: 18,002.9 19,927.8 18,002.9 19,887.0 359,945 410,747 Garlic ................: 4,515.0 5,115.0 4,515.0 5,115.0 333,905 390,021 Honeydews .............: 3,932.5 3,364.0 3,932.5 3,364.0 75,111 94,192 Lettuce : Head ................: 45,651.0 42,825.5 45,651.0 42,825.5 1,246,761 1,560,340 Leaf ................: 13,286.0 11,012.0 13,286.0 11,012.0 620,620 673,015 Romaine .............: 30,086.0 30,750.0 30,086.0 30,750.0 918,178 1,399,032 Onions ................: 73,391.5 73,460.0 68,300.0 71,870.7 954,253 971,236 Pea, green ............: 6,273.5 5,366.9 6,273.5 5,366.9 85,772 75,992 : Peppers, bell .........: 14,519.0 14,717.0 14,519.0 14,522.5 482,366 641,521 Peppers, chile ........: 4,712.1 4,232.5 4,705.1 4,232.5 163,255 142,909 Pumpkins ..............: 16,792.5 15,660.2 16,726.8 15,379.2 221,019 185,764 Spinach ...............: 8,034.5 7,320.6 8,034.5 7,320.6 350,673 400,921 Squash ................: 6,011.6 5,817.6 6,011.6 5,789.0 155,736 178,469 Tomatoes ..............: 285,220.7 245,690.0 285,220.7 240,564.2 2,035,030 1,674,174 Watermelons ...........: 39,748.0 40,617.0 39,748.0 40,144.6 548,645 595,618 : Total .................: 784,750.8 737,570.8 779,566.9 729,373.4 13,079,240 13,837,695 : Strawberries ..........: 31,610.9 31,991.5 31,552.0 31,953.7 3,503,415 3,486,649 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Principal Fresh Market Vegetable Area Planted and Harvested, Utilized Production and Value - States and United States: 2015 [Includes processing total for dual usage crops (asparagus, broccoli, and cauliflower)] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Area planted : Area harvested : Utilized production : Value of : : : : utilized production State :--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2015 : 2015 : 2015 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ------------ acres ------------ 1,000 cwt 1,000 dollars : Alabama ..............: 5,700 4,900 860.0 27,376 Arizona ..............: 113,800 112,800 29,510.0 1,040,269 Arkansas .............: 2,500 2,300 490.0 13,970 California ...........: 722,400 711,900 207,069.0 7,262,285 Colorado .............: 12,550 11,750 4,462.0 77,462 Connecticut ..........: 3,900 3,600 209.0 10,450 Delaware .............: 6,100 5,900 1,150.0 18,451 Florida ..............: 163,800 154,500 31,177.0 1,102,153 Georgia ..............: 96,500 90,100 18,540.0 470,261 Idaho ................: 8,000 8,000 5,760.0 49,803 : Illinois .............: 21,600 20,800 3,759.0 21,798 Indiana ..............: 15,400 14,400 3,018.0 53,844 Maine ................: 1,500 1,400 85.0 3,825 Maryland .............: 8,940 8,670 1,398.0 24,036 Massachusetts ........: 3,400 3,300 251.0 10,040 Michigan .............: 51,200 47,900 8,054.0 209,590 Mississippi ..........: 2,000 1,800 315.0 3,780 Missouri .............: 2,700 2,600 572.0 4,976 Nevada ...............: 4,200 4,200 1,369.0 45,177 New Hampshire ........: 1,400 1,300 88.0 4,840 : New Jersey ...........: 23,800 22,600 3,789.0 156,510 New Mexico ...........: 14,000 13,300 5,142.0 147,714 New York .............: 59,300 56,210 9,658.0 276,984 North Carolina .......: 32,100 28,300 5,303.0 142,874 Ohio .................: 31,700 29,100 4,192.0 135,446 Oklahoma .............: 5,500 4,000 540.0 7,290 Oregon ...............: 30,100 29,400 15,555.0 177,341 Pennsylvania .........: 20,230 18,730 2,168.0 81,045 Rhode Island .........: (D) (D) (D) (D) South Carolina .......: 15,800 14,500 4,173.0 91,541 : Tennessee ............: 12,150 10,990 1,489.0 76,550 Texas ................: 63,400 49,050 9,821.0 162,677 Utah .................: 1,400 1,300 715.0 8,385 Vermont ..............: (D) (D) (D) (D) Virginia .............: 8,750 8,360 1,252.0 52,668 Washington ...........: 54,600 54,100 20,579.0 435,325 Wisconsin ............: 8,400 8,000 2,018.0 40,818 : Other States 1/ ......: 1,390 1,290 60.0 3,880 : United States ........: 1,630,210 1,561,350 404,590.0 12,451,434 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. 1/ Includes data withheld above. Principal Processing Vegetable Area Planted and Harvested, Utilized Production and Value - States and United States: 2015 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Area planted : Area harvested : Utilized production : Value of production State :--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2015 : 2015 : 2015 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ------------ acres ------------ tons 1,000 dollars : California ...........: 316,600 313,550 14,483,930 1,382,592 Delaware .............: 28,200 28,000 99,190 27,293 Georgia ..............: 2,750 2,750 15,390 6,673 Illinois .............: 39,000 36,100 153,950 19,587 Maryland .............: 11,490 11,490 50,780 11,662 Minnesota ............: 179,700 158,000 905,855 125,256 New Jersey ...........: 3,900 3,800 16,710 3,745 New York .............: 40,810 39,510 174,320 34,841 Ohio .................: 10,000 9,700 133,690 19,289 Oregon ...............: 52,400 51,800 316,040 57,835 : Texas ................: 8,950 8,270 76,080 12,405 Washington ...........: 129,550 127,930 982,660 129,801 Wisconsin ............: 182,430 172,220 1,035,130 157,759 : Other States 1/ ......: 115,830 112,630 927,870 207,998 : United States ........: 1,121,610 1,075,750 19,371,595 2,196,736 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Includes data withheld above and/or data for States not listed in this table. Principal Vegetable Area Planted and Harvested, Total Production, Utilized Production, and Value of Utilized Production - States and United States: 2016-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Area planted : Area harvested State :------------------------------------------------------- : 2016 : 2017 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : acres : Alabama ...............: 3,600 5,600 3,500 5,400 Arizona ...............: 125,000 134,600 124,400 131,600 California ............: 1,027,300 990,400 1,016,300 971,500 Colorado ..............: (D) (D) (D) (D) Delaware ..............: (D) (D) (D) (D) Florida ...............: 170,500 170,800 159,900 164,900 Georgia ...............: 97,900 95,400 93,300 90,200 Idaho .................: 13,700 12,200 13,400 11,900 Illinois ..............: 57,900 48,800 55,300 46,100 Indiana ...............: 34,200 31,800 33,100 30,800 : Maryland ..............: 18,800 (D) 18,600 (D) Michigan ..............: 108,800 104,500 104,500 101,100 Minnesota .............: 179,100 176,130 166,800 164,540 Missouri ..............: 2,800 3,100 2,700 3,000 New Jersey ............: 29,100 28,800 27,900 27,700 New Mexico ............: 15,400 15,400 14,800 14,700 New York ..............: 93,500 90,500 87,100 86,400 North Carolina ........: 40,300 38,100 38,200 37,100 Ohio ..................: 39,400 38,100 37,000 36,300 Oregon ................: (D) (D) (D) (D) : Pennsylvania ..........: 25,600 25,650 23,900 24,250 South Carolina ........: 15,100 (D) 14,300 (D) Tennessee .............: 16,400 14,900 15,600 14,300 Texas .................: 71,000 74,600 63,800 66,400 Virginia ..............: (D) 5,200 (D) 4,900 Washington ............: 177,500 158,600 174,200 154,700 Wisconsin .............: (D) (D) (D) (D) : Other States 1/ .......: 305,900 306,050 292,600 294,330 : United States .........: 2,668,800 2,569,230 2,581,200 2,482,120 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Principal Vegetable Area Planted and Harvested, Total Production, Utilized Production, and Value of Utilized Production - States and United States: 2016-2017 (continued) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Total Production : Utilized Production : Value of : : : Utilized Production State :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 2016 : 2017 : 2016 : 2017 : 2016 : 2017 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : -------------------- 1,000 cwt -------------------- ----- 1,000 dollars ---- : Alabama ...............: 329.0 756.0 329.0 756.0 4,442 16,659 Arizona ...............: 35,534.1 36,376.5 35,534.1 36,376.5 1,302,570 1,671,053 California ............: 470,044.9 422,523.5 470,044.9 417,605.3 7,308,008 7,851,709 Colorado ..............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Delaware ..............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Florida ...............: 32,294.5 36,695.7 32,294.5 36,233.6 1,064,187 1,052,570 Georgia ...............: 19,428.0 20,855.6 19,428.0 20,484.6 434,569 461,898 Idaho .................: 8,374.0 6,229.0 7,385.0 6,163.9 53,998 59,031 Illinois ..............: 10,537.0 9,204.2 10,537.0 9,069.0 86,087 43,077 Indiana ...............: 10,102.9 9,315.7 10,102.9 9,314.7 106,178 102,280 : Maryland ..............: 2,928.4 (D) 2,928.4 (D) 37,426 (D) Michigan ..............: 17,403.0 18,019.5 17,403.0 18,003.9 266,962 274,125 Minnesota .............: 18,388.3 21,105.3 18,378.4 20,980.2 104,166 108,776 Missouri ..............: 1,053.0 705.0 1,053.0 702.2 12,192 8,445 New Jersey ............: 3,864.8 4,059.6 3,864.2 4,051.4 149,699 155,927 New Mexico ............: 4,930.0 6,082.0 4,930.0 6,082.0 145,493 129,043 New York ..............: 11,874.0 13,642.1 11,874.0 13,126.1 249,479 220,666 North Carolina ........: 6,749.9 7,277.8 6,749.9 7,176.6 175,878 166,388 Ohio ..................: 7,820.0 7,996.5 7,820.0 7,946.2 169,403 158,750 Oregon ................: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) : Pennsylvania ..........: 2,089.8 2,270.3 2,089.8 2,230.1 53,974 63,899 South Carolina ........: 4,176.0 (D) 4,176.0 (D) 85,213 (D) Tennessee .............: 2,128.8 1,975.5 2,128.8 1,945.1 79,516 82,326 Texas .................: 16,013.0 14,224.0 15,879.7 13,987.5 232,898 276,532 Virginia ..............: (D) 1,208.4 (D) 1,204.0 (D) 49,607 Washington ............: 44,073.8 41,143.4 41,882.9 40,102.9 394,600 336,248 Wisconsin .............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) : Other States 1/ .......: 54,613.6 55,905.2 52,753.4 55,831.6 562,302 548,686 : United States .........: 784,750.8 737,570.8 779,566.9 729,373.4 13,079,240 13,837,695 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. 1/ Includes data withheld above. Artichokes for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : California .............: 6,800 6,800 7,200 6,800 6,800 7,200 : United States ..........: 6,800 6,800 7,200 6,800 6,800 7,200 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----------- cwt ----------- -------- 1,000 cwt ------- : California .............: 135.0 145.0 130.0 (NA) 986.0 936.0 : United States ..........: 135.0 145.0 130.0 (NA) 986.0 936.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : California .............: (NA) - - 918.0 986.0 936.0 : United States ..........: (NA) - - 918.0 986.0 936.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : --------- dollars --------- ------- 1,000 dollars ------ : California .............: 87.80 78.80 70.00 80,600 77,697 65,520 : United States ..........: 87.80 78.80 70.00 80,600 77,697 65,520 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. Artichoke Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh market : California .............: (NA) 986.0 936.0 : United States ..........: (NA) 986.0 936.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : California .............: (NA) - - : United States ..........: (NA) - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per cwt ---- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : Fresh market : California .............: (NA) 78.80 70.00 (NA) 77,697 65,520 : United States ..........: (NA) 78.80 70.00 (NA) 77,697 65,520 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ---- dollars per ton ---- ----- 1,000 dollars ---- : Processing : California .............: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - : United States ..........: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. Asparagus for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Area planted : Area harvested State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : acres : California .....: 9,500 9,400 8,300 9,000 9,000 8,000 Michigan .......: 10,000 10,200 9,800 8,900 9,200 9,000 New Jersey 1/ ..: (NA) 2,000 2,100 (NA) 1,900 2,000 Washington .....: 4,000 4,000 4,500 3,800 3,600 4,300 : United States ..: 23,500 25,600 24,700 21,700 23,700 23,300 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Yield per acre : Total production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ----------- cwt ----------- -------- 1,000 cwt ------- : California .....: 26.0 24.0 16.0 (NA) 216.0 128.0 Michigan .......: 26.0 25.0 27.0 (NA) 230.0 243.0 New Jersey 1/ ..: (NA) 40.0 34.0 (NA) 76.0 68.0 Washington .....: 44.0 62.0 54.0 (NA) 223.2 232.2 : United States ..: 29.0 31.4 28.8 (NA) 745.2 671.2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Harvested not sold : Utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 cwt : California .....: (NA) - 1.3 234.0 216.0 126.7 Michigan .......: (NA) - - 228.0 230.0 243.0 New Jersey 1/ ..: (NA) 0.2 - (NA) 75.8 68.0 Washington .....: (NA) - - 167.0 223.2 232.2 : United States ..: (NA) 0.2 1.3 629.0 745.0 669.9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ---------- dollars ---------- ------- 1,000 dollars ------ : California .....: 139.00 128.00 129.00 32,526 27,648 16,344 Michigan .......: 86.60 87.70 85.70 19,754 20,165 20,816 New Jersey 1/ ..: (NA) 171.00 183.00 (NA) 12,962 12,421 Washington .....: 93.30 88.40 101.00 15,584 19,721 23,546 : United States ..: 108.00 108.00 109.00 67,864 80,496 73,127 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. 1/ Estimates began in 2016. Asparagus Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt Fresh market : California 1/ ..........: 234.0 216.0 126.7 Michigan ...............: (D) (D) 114.7 New Jersey 2/ ..........: (NA) 75.8 (D) Washington .............: (D) (D) (D) : Other States 3/ ........: 240.0 293.2 278.1 : United States ..........: 474.0 585.0 519.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons Processing : California 1/ ..........: (NA) - - Michigan ...............: (D) (D) 6,415 New Jersey 2/ ..........: (NA) - (D) Washington .............: (D) (D) (D) : Other States 3/ ........: 7,750 7,999 1,103 : United States ..........: 7,750 7,999 7,518 : Canning 4/ .............: 2,300 (NA) (NA) : Freezing 4/ ............: 5,450 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per cwt ------ ------- 1,000 dollars ------ Fresh market : California 1/ ..........: 139.00 128.00 129.00 32,526 27,648 16,344 Michigan ...............: (D) (D) 92.00 (D) (D) 10,552 New Jersey 2/ ..........: (NA) 171.00 (D) (NA) 12,962 (D) Washington .............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) : Other States 3/ ........: 94.00 90.30 124.00 22,560 26,470 34,478 : United States ..........: 116.00 115.00 118.00 55,086 67,080 61,374 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------- dollars per ton ------ ------- 1,000 dollars ------ Processing : California 1/ ..........: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Michigan ...............: (D) (D) 1,600.00 (D) (D) 10,264 New Jersey 2/ ..........: (NA) (X) (D) (NA) - (D) Washington .............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) : Other States 3/ ........: 1,650.00 1,680.00 1,350.00 12,778 13,416 1,489 : United States ..........: 1,650.00 1,680.00 1,560.00 12,778 13,416 11,753 : Canning 4/ .............: 1,620.00 (NA) (NA) 3,726 (NA) (NA) : Freezing 4/ ............: 1,660.00 (NA) (NA) 9,052 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Fresh market includes a small amount of processing asparagus for 2015. 2/ Estimates began in 2016. 3/ Includes data withheld above. 4/ Estimates discontinued in 2016. Green Lima Beans for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 [Dry edible beans are excluded] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : Processing : United States ..........: 29,780 (NA) (NA) 29,200 (NA) (NA) : Canning ................: 4,740 (NA) (NA) 4,390 (NA) (NA) : Freezing ...............: 25,040 (NA) (NA) 24,810 (NA) (NA) Fordhooks ..............: 1,000 (NA) (NA) 1,000 (NA) (NA) Baby limas .............: 24,040 (NA) (NA) 23,810 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : All : California .............: (NA) 3,600 3,000 (NA) 3,600 3,000 Delaware ...............: (NA) (D) 9,600 (NA) (D) 9,500 Illinois ...............: (NA) 1,600 1,500 (NA) 1,500 1,400 Maryland ...............: (NA) (D) 2,200 (NA) (D) 2,200 Oregon .................: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Virginia ...............: (NA) (D) 300 (NA) (D) 200 Washington .............: (NA) 2,900 2,200 (NA) 2,900 2,200 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) : Other States 1/ ........: (X) 18,000 7,000 (X) 17,300 6,900 : United States ..........: (NA) 26,100 25,800 (NA) 25,300 25,400 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : United States ..........: 1.72 (NA) (NA) : Canning ................: 1.22 (NA) (NA) : Freezing ...............: 1.81 (NA) (NA) Fordhooks ..............: 2.00 (NA) (NA) Baby limas .............: 1.80 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----------- cwt ---------- -------- 1,000 cwt ------- : All : California .............: (NA) 27.0 21.0 (NA) 97.2 63.0 Delaware ...............: (NA) (D) 26.0 (NA) (D) 247.0 Illinois ...............: (NA) 30.0 30.0 (NA) 45.0 42.0 Maryland ...............: (NA) (D) 35.0 (NA) (D) 77.0 Oregon .................: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Virginia ...............: (NA) (D) 7.0 (NA) (D) 1.4 Washington .............: (NA) 37.0 50.0 (NA) 107.3 110.0 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) : Other States 1/ ........: (X) 29.0 26.0 (X) 508.4 180.3 : United States ..........: (NA) 30.0 28.4 (NA) 757.9 720.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Green Lima Beans for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) [Dry edible beans are excluded] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : All : California .............: (NA) - - (NA) 97.2 63.0 Delaware ...............: (NA) - - (NA) (D) 247.0 Illinois ...............: (NA) - - (NA) 45.0 42.0 Maryland ...............: (NA) - - (NA) (D) 77.0 Oregon .................: (NA) - - (NA) (D) (D) Virginia ...............: (NA) - - (NA) (D) 1.4 Washington .............: (NA) - - (NA) 107.3 110.0 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) - - (NA) (D) (D) : Other States 1/ ........: (X) - - (X) 508.4 180.3 : United States ..........: (NA) - - (NA) 757.9 720.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : --------- dollars --------- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : All : California .............: (NA) 45.60 49.00 (NA) 4,437 3,084 Delaware ...............: (NA) (D) 28.80 (NA) (D) 7,125 Illinois ...............: (NA) 18.20 21.20 (NA) 819 891 Maryland ...............: (NA) (D) 27.70 (NA) (D) 2,132 Oregon .................: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Virginia ...............: (NA) (D) 100.00 (NA) (D) 140 Washington .............: (NA) 36.80 31.40 (NA) 3,953 3,449 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) : Other States 1/ ........: (X) 23.30 22.50 (X) 11,847 4,056 : United States ..........: (NA) 27.80 29.00 (NA) 21,056 20,877 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Includes data withheld above. Green Lima Bean Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 [Dry edible beans are excluded] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh market : California .............: (NA) - - Delaware ...............: (NA) (D) (D) Illinois ...............: (NA) - (D) Maryland ...............: (NA) (D) (D) Oregon .................: (NA) (D) (D) Virginia ...............: (NA) (D) 1.4 Washington .............: (NA) (D) (D) Wisconsin ..............: (NA) (D) (D) : Other States 1/ ........: (X) 10.9 3.7 : United States ..........: (NA) 10.9 5.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : California .............: (D) 4,860 3,150 Delaware ...............: (D) (D) (D) Illinois ...............: (D) 2,250 (D) Maryland ...............: (D) (D) (D) Oregon .................: (D) (D) (D) Virginia ...............: (D) (D) - Washington .............: (D) (D) (D) Wisconsin ..............: (D) (D) (D) : Other States 2/ ........: 50,255 30,240 32,631 : United States ..........: 50,255 37,350 35,781 : Canning 3/ .............: 5,375 (NA) (NA) : Freezing 3/ ............: 44,880 (NA) (NA) Fordhooks 3/ ...........: 2,000 (NA) (NA) Baby limas 3/ ..........: 42,880 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Green Lima Bean Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) [Dry edible beans are excluded] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per cwt ----- ----- 1,000 dollars ----- : Fresh market : California .............: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Delaware ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Illinois ...............: (NA) (X) (D) (NA) - (D) Maryland ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Oregon .................: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Virginia ...............: (NA) (D) 100.00 (NA) (D) 140 Washington .............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Wisconsin ..............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) : Other States 1/ ........: (X) 163.00 153.00 (X) 1,777 566 : United States ..........: (NA) 163.00 138.00 (NA) 1,777 706 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per ton ----- ------- 1,000 dollars ------ : Processing : California .............: (D) 913.00 979.00 (D) 4,437 3,084 Delaware ...............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Illinois ...............: (D) 364.00 (D) (D) 819 (D) Maryland ...............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Oregon .................: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Virginia ...............: (D) (D) (X) (D) (D) - Washington .............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Wisconsin ..............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) : Other States 2/ ........: 596.00 464.00 524.00 29,950 14,023 17,087 : United States ..........: 596.00 516.00 564.00 29,950 19,279 20,171 : Canning 3/ .............: 748.00 (NA) (NA) 4,020 (NA) (NA) : Freezing 3/ ............: 578.00 (NA) (NA) 25,930 (NA) (NA) Fordhooks 3/ ...........: 940.00 (NA) (NA) 1,880 (NA) (NA) Baby limas 3/ ..........: 561.00 (NA) (NA) 24,050 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Includes data withheld above. 2/ In 2015, includes data withheld above and/or data for States not listed in this table. In 2016 and 2017, includes data withheld above. 3/ Estimates discontinued in 2016. Snap Beans for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : Fresh market : California .............: 4,500 (NA) (NA) 4,400 (NA) (NA) Florida ................: 29,500 (NA) (NA) 27,500 (NA) (NA) Georgia ................: 10,800 (NA) (NA) 10,300 (NA) (NA) Maryland ...............: 880 (NA) (NA) 870 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 3,100 (NA) (NA) 2,900 (NA) (NA) New Jersey .............: 2,600 (NA) (NA) 2,400 (NA) (NA) New York ...............: 10,900 (NA) (NA) 10,700 (NA) (NA) North Carolina .........: 4,800 (NA) (NA) 2,800 (NA) (NA) South Carolina .........: 600 (NA) (NA) 400 (NA) (NA) Tennessee ..............: 8,000 (NA) (NA) 7,000 (NA) (NA) Virginia ...............: 2,000 (NA) (NA) 1,900 (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: 77,680 (NA) (NA) 71,170 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : Processing : Indiana ................: 3,600 (NA) (NA) 3,600 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 16,000 (NA) (NA) 16,000 (NA) (NA) New York ...............: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) Oregon .................: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) Pennsylvania ...........: 5,500 (NA) (NA) 5,300 (NA) (NA) Wisconsin ..............: 69,200 (NA) (NA) 65,300 (NA) (NA) : Other States 1/ ........: 70,570 (X) (X) 68,720 (X) (X) : United States ..........: 164,870 (NA) (NA) 158,920 (NA) (NA) : Canning ................: 112,068 (NA) (NA) 107,748 (NA) (NA) : Freezing ...............: 52,802 (NA) (NA) 51,172 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : All : California .............: (NA) 7,000 8,000 (NA) 7,000 7,900 Delaware ...............: (NA) 2,300 2,200 (NA) 2,200 2,200 Florida ................: (NA) 28,200 24,400 (NA) 27,300 23,900 Georgia ................: (NA) 14,100 12,500 (NA) 13,400 10,600 Illinois ...............: (NA) 15,600 8,000 (NA) 15,200 7,500 Indiana ................: (NA) 3,900 3,500 (NA) 3,800 3,400 Maryland ...............: (NA) 4,400 3,000 (NA) 4,400 3,000 Michigan ...............: (NA) 19,300 18,300 (NA) 18,400 17,800 Minnesota ..............: (NA) 5,200 5,200 (NA) 5,000 5,100 New Jersey .............: (NA) 2,800 2,500 (NA) 2,600 2,300 : New York ...............: (NA) 30,600 29,100 (NA) 28,300 28,000 North Carolina .........: (NA) 5,900 5,800 (NA) 5,000 5,600 Oregon .................: (NA) 12,200 7,700 (NA) 12,100 7,500 Pennsylvania ...........: (NA) 10,000 9,500 (NA) 9,400 9,100 Tennessee ..............: (NA) 10,600 9,400 (NA) 10,200 9,100 Texas ..................: (NA) 2,500 6,800 (NA) 2,200 6,700 Washington .............: (NA) 2,900 2,500 (NA) 2,900 2,400 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 71,800 66,600 (NA) 66,600 62,500 : United States ..........: (NA) 249,300 225,000 (NA) 236,000 214,600 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Snap Beans for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : cwt : Fresh market : California .............: 120.0 (NA) (NA) Florida ................: 45.0 (NA) (NA) Georgia ................: 50.0 (NA) (NA) Maryland ...............: 54.0 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 73.0 (NA) (NA) New Jersey .............: 32.0 (NA) (NA) New York ...............: 65.0 (NA) (NA) North Carolina .........: 41.0 (NA) (NA) South Carolina .........: 28.0 (NA) (NA) Tennessee ..............: 64.0 (NA) (NA) Virginia ...............: 34.0 (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: 56.0 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : Indiana ................: 3.78 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 4.45 (NA) (NA) New York ...............: (D) (NA) (NA) Oregon .................: (D) (NA) (NA) Pennsylvania ...........: 4.40 (NA) (NA) Wisconsin ..............: 5.05 (NA) (NA) : Other States 1/ ........: 4.76 (X) (X) : United States ..........: 4.81 (NA) (NA) : Canning ................: 4.62 (NA) (NA) : Freezing ...............: 5.22 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----------- cwt ---------- --------- 1,000 cwt -------- : All : California .............: (NA) 120.0 105.0 (NA) 840.0 829.5 Delaware ...............: (NA) 65.0 60.0 (NA) 143.0 132.0 Florida ................: (NA) 55.0 58.0 (NA) 1,501.5 1,386.2 Georgia ................: (NA) 55.0 61.0 (NA) 737.0 646.6 Illinois ...............: (NA) 85.0 80.0 (NA) 1,292.0 600.0 Indiana ................: (NA) 91.0 78.0 (NA) 345.8 265.2 Maryland ...............: (NA) 65.0 74.0 (NA) 286.0 222.0 Michigan ...............: (NA) 91.0 100.0 (NA) 1,674.4 1,780.0 Minnesota ..............: (NA) 73.0 105.0 (NA) 365.0 535.5 New Jersey .............: (NA) 34.0 39.0 (NA) 88.4 89.7 : New York ...............: (NA) 70.0 73.0 (NA) 1,981.0 2,044.0 North Carolina .........: (NA) 39.0 37.0 (NA) 195.0 207.2 Oregon .................: (NA) 135.0 130.0 (NA) 1,633.5 975.0 Pennsylvania ...........: (NA) 57.0 67.0 (NA) 535.8 609.7 Tennessee ..............: (NA) 64.0 61.0 (NA) 652.8 555.1 Texas ..................: (NA) 55.0 60.0 (NA) 121.0 402.0 Washington .............: (NA) 92.0 79.0 (NA) 266.8 189.6 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 110.0 105.0 (NA) 7,326.0 6,562.5 : United States ..........: (NA) 84.7 84.0 (NA) 19,985.0 18,031.8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Snap Beans for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : All : California .............: (NA) - 1.7 (NA) 840.0 827.8 Delaware ...............: (NA) - - (NA) 143.0 132.0 Florida ................: (NA) - 19.4 (NA) 1,501.5 1,366.8 Georgia ................: (NA) - - (NA) 737.0 646.6 Illinois ...............: (NA) - - (NA) 1,292.0 600.0 Indiana ................: (NA) - - (NA) 345.8 265.2 Maryland ...............: (NA) - - (NA) 286.0 222.0 Michigan ...............: (NA) - 1.8 (NA) 1,674.4 1,778.2 Minnesota ..............: (NA) - 5.4 (NA) 365.0 530.1 New Jersey .............: (NA) 0.4 - (NA) 88.0 89.7 : New York ...............: (NA) - 4.1 (NA) 1,981.0 2,039.9 North Carolina .........: (NA) - 0.8 (NA) 195.0 206.4 Oregon .................: (NA) 11.4 9.7 (NA) 1,622.1 965.3 Pennsylvania ...........: (NA) - - (NA) 535.8 609.7 Tennessee ..............: (NA) - 2.8 (NA) 652.8 552.3 Texas ..................: (NA) 2.9 - (NA) 118.1 402.0 Washington .............: (NA) 4.8 - (NA) 262.0 189.6 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) - - (NA) 7,326.0 6,562.5 : United States ..........: (NA) 19.5 45.7 (NA) 19,965.5 17,986.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : --------- dollars -------- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : All : California .............: (NA) 68.70 69.70 (NA) 57,689 57,722 Delaware ...............: (NA) 18.60 19.10 (NA) 2,660 2,522 Florida ................: (NA) 51.00 51.80 (NA) 76,530 70,793 Georgia ................: (NA) 38.60 31.10 (NA) 28,435 20,124 Illinois ...............: (NA) 16.60 6.25 (NA) 21,435 3,750 Indiana ................: (NA) 17.60 15.40 (NA) 6,087 4,093 Maryland ...............: (NA) 18.10 19.20 (NA) 5,185 4,264 Michigan ...............: (NA) 19.30 14.60 (NA) 32,263 25,898 Minnesota ..............: (NA) 10.40 6.46 (NA) 3,804 3,423 New Jersey .............: (NA) 37.10 44.80 (NA) 3,262 4,015 : New York ...............: (NA) 26.30 20.50 (NA) 52,146 41,861 North Carolina .........: (NA) 32.50 36.40 (NA) 6,335 7,506 Oregon .................: (NA) 10.70 12.00 (NA) 17,419 11,566 Pennsylvania ...........: (NA) 16.90 21.20 (NA) 9,075 12,919 Tennessee ..............: (NA) 38.70 32.90 (NA) 25,239 18,170 Texas ..................: (NA) 10.60 9.00 (NA) 1,249 3,618 Washington .............: (NA) 19.00 28.60 (NA) 4,968 5,418 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 6.23 6.11 (NA) 45,634 40,115 : United States ..........: (NA) 20.00 18.80 (NA) 399,415 337,777 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Includes data withheld above and/or data for States not listed in this table. Snap Bean Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh Market : California .............: 528.0 (D) (D) Delaware 1/ ............: (NA) (D) (D) Florida ................: 1,238.0 1,345.3 1,237.9 Georgia ................: 515.0 585.2 (D) Illinois 1/ ............: (NA) 144.7 6.0 Indiana 1/ .............: (NA) (D) (D) Maryland ...............: 47.0 (D) (D) Michigan ...............: 212.0 256.2 202.9 Minnesota 1/ ...........: (NA) (D) 7.5 New Jersey .............: 77.0 68.0 (D) : New York ...............: 696.0 435.8 (D) North Carolina .........: 115.0 (D) (D) Oregon 1/ ..............: (NA) (D) (D) Pennsylvania 1/ ........: (NA) 141.5 (D) South Carolina 2/ ......: 11.0 (NA) (NA) Tennessee ..............: 448.0 (D) (D) Texas 1/ ...............: (NA) (D) (D) Virginia 2/ ............: 65.0 (NA) (NA) Washington 1/ ..........: (NA) (D) (D) Wisconsin 1/ ...........: (NA) 7.3 105.0 : Other States 3/ ........: - 1,131.0 2,060.4 : United States ..........: 3,952.0 4,115.0 3,619.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : : Processing : California .............: (D) (D) (D) Delaware ...............: (D) (D) (D) Florida ................: (D) 7,808 6,446 Georgia ................: (D) 7,591 (D) Illinois ...............: (D) 57,365 29,700 Indiana ................: 13,620 (D) (D) Maryland ...............: (D) (D) (D) Michigan ...............: 71,200 70,911 78,765 Minnesota ..............: (D) (D) 26,132 New Jersey .............: (D) 999 (D) : New York ...............: (D) 77,259 (D) North Carolina .........: (D) (D) (D) Oregon .................: (D) (D) (D) Pennsylvania ...........: 23,330 19,717 (D) Tennessee ..............: (D) (D) (D) Texas ..................: (D) (D) (D) Washington .............: (D) (D) (D) Wisconsin ..............: 329,530 365,934 322,875 : Other States 4/ ........: 327,220 184,937 254,412 : United States ..........: 764,900 792,521 718,330 : Canning 2/ .............: 497,810 (NA) (NA) : Freezing 2/ ............: 267,090 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Snap Bean Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per cwt ------ ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : Fresh market : California .............: 67.00 (D) (D) 35,376 (D) (D) Delaware 1/ ............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Florida ................: 61.60 55.00 55.60 76,261 73,992 68,827 Georgia ................: 38.50 44.70 (D) 19,828 26,158 (D) Illinois 1/ ............: (NA) 96.60 65.60 (NA) 13,978 394 Indiana 1/ .............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Maryland ...............: 41.00 (D) (D) 1,927 (D) (D) Michigan ...............: 54.20 59.50 50.00 11,490 15,244 10,145 Minnesota 1/ ...........: (NA) (D) 73.10 (NA) (D) 548 New Jersey .............: 59.80 43.50 (D) 4,605 2,958 (D) : New York ...............: 84.00 84.20 (D) 58,464 36,694 (D) North Carolina .........: 31.00 (D) (D) 3,565 (D) (D) Oregon 1/ ..............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Pennsylvania 1/ ........: (NA) 24.70 (D) (NA) 3,495 (D) South Carolina 2/ ......: 75.00 (NA) (NA) 825 (NA) (NA) Tennessee ..............: 41.00 (D) (D) 18,368 (D) (D) Texas 1/ ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Virginia 2/ ............: 65.00 (NA) (NA) 4,225 (NA) (NA) Washington 1/ ..........: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Wisconsin 1/ ...........: (NA) 35.30 43.80 (NA) 258 4,599 : Other States 3/ ........: (X) 66.40 56.70 - 75,088 116,833 : United States ..........: 59.40 60.20 55.60 234,934 247,865 201,346 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Snap Bean Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per ton ----- ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : Processing : California .............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Delaware ...............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Florida ................: (D) 325.00 305.00 (D) 2,538 1,966 Georgia ................: (D) 300.00 (D) (D) 2,277 (D) Illinois ...............: (D) 130.00 113.00 (D) 7,457 3,356 Indiana ................: 230.00 (D) (D) 3,133 (D) (D) Maryland ...............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Michigan ...............: 230.00 240.00 200.00 16,376 17,019 15,753 Minnesota ..............: (D) (D) 110.00 (D) (D) 2,875 New Jersey .............: (D) 304.00 (D) (D) 304 (D) : New York ...............: (D) 200.00 (D) (D) 15,452 (D) North Carolina .........: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Oregon .................: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Pennsylvania ...........: 317.00 283.00 (D) 7,388 5,580 (D) Tennessee ..............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Texas ..................: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Washington .............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Wisconsin ..............: 202.00 124.00 110.00 66,472 45,376 35,516 : Other States 4/ ........: 260.00 300.00 303.00 85,209 55,547 76,965 : United States ..........: 233.00 191.00 190.00 178,578 151,550 136,431 : Canning 2/ .............: 207.00 (NA) (NA) 102,900 (NA) (NA) : Freezing 2/ ............: 283.00 (NA) (NA) 75,678 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Estimates began in 2016. 2/ Estimates discontinued in 2016. 3/ Includes data withheld above. 4/ In 2015, includes data withheld above and/or data for States not listed in this table. In 2016 and 2017, includes data withheld above. Broccoli for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Area planted : Area harvested State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : acres : Arizona ........: 8,400 9,300 10,500 8,400 9,300 10,400 California .....: 118,000 123,000 120,000 116,000 122,000 119,000 : United States ..: 126,400 132,300 130,500 124,400 131,300 129,400 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Yield per acre : Total production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ----------- cwt ----------- --------- 1,000 cwt -------- : Arizona ........: 120.0 120.0 130.0 (NA) 1,116.0 1,352.0 California .....: 180.0 175.0 160.0 (NA) 21,350.0 19,040.0 : United States ..: 176.0 171.1 157.6 (NA) 22,466.0 20,392.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Harvested not sold : Utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 cwt : Arizona ........: (NA) - - 1,008.0 1,116.0 1,352.0 California .....: (NA) - - 20,880.0 21,350.0 19,040.0 : United States ..: (NA) - - 21,888.0 22,466.0 20,392.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : --------- dollars --------- -------- 1,000 dollars ------- : Arizona ........: 52.10 64.70 56.20 52,517 72,205 75,982 California .....: 48.20 36.30 44.70 1,006,253 774,390 850,183 : United States ..: 48.40 37.70 45.40 1,058,770 846,595 926,165 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. Broccoli Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt Fresh market : Arizona ................: 1,008.0 1,116.0 1,352.0 California .............: 20,096.0 20,432.0 18,564.0 : United States ..........: 21,104.0 21,548.0 19,916.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons Processing : Arizona ................: - - - California .............: 39,200 45,903 23,800 : United States ..........: 39,200 45,903 23,800 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per cwt ----- -------- 1,000 dollars ------- Fresh market : Arizona ................: 52.10 64.70 56.20 52,517 72,205 75,982 California .............: 48.90 36.80 45.30 982,694 751,898 840,949 : United States ..........: 49.10 38.20 46.00 1,035,211 824,103 916,931 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per ton ----- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ Processing : Arizona ................: (X) (X) (X) - - - California .............: 601.00 490.00 388.00 23,559 22,492 9,234 : United States ..........: 601.00 490.00 388.00 23,559 22,492 9,234 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (X) Not applicable. Cabbage for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : Fresh market : Arizona ................: 2,600 (NA) (NA) 2,600 (NA) (NA) California .............: 13,800 (NA) (NA) 13,800 (NA) (NA) Colorado ...............: 1,500 (NA) (NA) 1,500 (NA) (NA) Florida ................: 8,900 (NA) (NA) 8,200 (NA) (NA) Georgia ................: 4,900 (NA) (NA) 3,700 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 3,400 (NA) (NA) 3,300 (NA) (NA) New Jersey .............: 1,800 (NA) (NA) 1,600 (NA) (NA) New York ...............: 8,300 (NA) (NA) 8,100 (NA) (NA) North Carolina .........: 2,600 (NA) (NA) 2,400 (NA) (NA) Ohio ...................: 1,300 (NA) (NA) 1,100 (NA) (NA) : Pennsylvania ...........: 930 (NA) (NA) 830 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 6,100 (NA) (NA) 5,500 (NA) (NA) Virginia ...............: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) Wisconsin ..............: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) : Other States 1/ ........: 3,400 (X) (X) 3,290 (X) (X) : United States ..........: 59,530 (NA) (NA) 55,920 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : All : Arizona ................: (NA) 3,800 5,900 (NA) 3,800 5,800 California .............: (NA) 14,600 14,900 (NA) 14,400 14,500 Florida ................: (NA) 8,500 8,000 (NA) 7,900 7,600 Georgia ................: (NA) 5,000 4,900 (NA) 4,500 4,600 Michigan ...............: (NA) 3,600 4,300 (NA) 3,500 4,200 New York ...............: (NA) 9,300 8,800 (NA) 8,900 8,300 North Carolina .........: (NA) 3,000 2,600 (NA) 2,900 2,500 Texas ..................: (NA) 6,100 6,500 (NA) 5,700 6,100 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 6,100 6,100 (NA) 6,000 6,000 : United States ..........: (NA) 60,000 62,000 (NA) 57,600 59,600 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : cwt : Fresh market : Arizona ................: 340.0 (NA) (NA) California .............: 425.0 (NA) (NA) Colorado ...............: 435.0 (NA) (NA) Florida ................: 330.0 (NA) (NA) Georgia ................: 340.0 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 290.0 (NA) (NA) New Jersey .............: 390.0 (NA) (NA) New York ...............: 400.0 (NA) (NA) North Carolina .........: 220.0 (NA) (NA) Ohio ...................: 370.0 (NA) (NA) : Pennsylvania ...........: 250.0 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 330.0 (NA) (NA) Virginia ...............: (D) (NA) (NA) Wisconsin ..............: (D) (NA) (NA) : Other States 1/ ........: 314.0 (X) (X) : United States ..........: 361.0 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Cabbage for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----------- cwt ---------- --------- 1,000 cwt -------- : All : Arizona ................: (NA) 425.0 450.0 (NA) 1,615.0 2,610.0 California .............: (NA) 400.0 380.0 (NA) 5,760.0 5,510.0 Florida ................: (NA) 340.0 360.0 (NA) 2,686.0 2,736.0 Georgia ................: (NA) 380.0 420.0 (NA) 1,710.0 1,932.0 Michigan ...............: (NA) 330.0 340.0 (NA) 1,155.0 1,428.0 New York ...............: (NA) 385.0 415.0 (NA) 3,426.5 3,444.5 North Carolina .........: (NA) 245.0 280.0 (NA) 710.5 700.0 Texas ..................: (NA) 350.0 300.0 (NA) 1,995.0 1,830.0 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 665.0 550.0 (NA) 3,990.0 3,300.0 : United States ..........: (NA) 400.1 394.1 (NA) 23,048.0 23,490.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : All : Arizona ................: (NA) - - (NA) 1,615.0 2,610.0 California .............: (NA) - - (NA) 5,760.0 5,510.0 Florida ................: (NA) - 27.4 (NA) 2,686.0 2,708.6 Georgia ................: (NA) - - (NA) 1,710.0 1,932.0 Michigan ...............: (NA) - - (NA) 1,155.0 1,428.0 New York ...............: (NA) - - (NA) 3,426.5 3,444.5 North Carolina .........: (NA) - - (NA) 710.5 700.0 Texas ..................: (NA) - - (NA) 1,995.0 1,830.0 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) - - (NA) 3,990.0 3,300.0 : United States ..........: (NA) - 27.4 (NA) 23,048.0 23,463.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : --------- dollars -------- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : All : Arizona ................: (NA) 31.70 17.30 (NA) 51,196 45,176 California .............: (NA) 27.60 28.80 (NA) 158,976 158,625 Florida ................: (NA) 18.40 15.50 (NA) 49,422 41,983 Georgia ................: (NA) 14.10 12.90 (NA) 24,111 24,916 Michigan ...............: (NA) 13.80 11.00 (NA) 15,987 15,744 New York ...............: (NA) 17.40 14.10 (NA) 59,580 48,646 North Carolina .........: (NA) 18.40 15.10 (NA) 13,073 10,570 Texas ..................: (NA) 18.00 17.80 (NA) 35,910 32,574 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 11.90 15.30 (NA) 47,583 50,490 : United States ..........: (NA) 19.80 18.30 (NA) 455,838 428,724 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Includes data withheld above. Cabbage Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh market : Arizona ................: 884.0 1,615.0 (D) California .............: 5,865.0 5,760.0 (D) Colorado 1/ ............: 653.0 (NA) (NA) Florida ................: 2,706.0 2,686.0 2,708.6 Georgia ................: 1,258.0 (D) (D) Michigan ...............: 957.0 (D) (D) New Jersey 1/ ..........: 624.0 (NA) (NA) New York ...............: 3,240.0 (D) 3,041.5 North Carolina .........: 528.0 710.5 700.0 Ohio 1/ ................: 407.0 (NA) (NA) : Pennsylvania 1/ ........: 208.0 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 1,815.0 1,995.0 1,830.0 Virginia 1/ ............: (D) (NA) (NA) Wisconsin ..............: (D) (D) (D) : Other States 2/ ........: 1,033.0 6,087.8 10,784.9 : United States ..........: 20,178.0 18,854.3 19,065.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : Arizona ................: (NA) - (D) California .............: (NA) - (D) Florida ................: (NA) - - Georgia ................: (NA) (D) (D) Michigan ...............: (NA) (D) (D) New York ...............: (NA) (D) 20,150 North Carolina .........: (NA) - - Texas ..................: (NA) - - Wisconsin ..............: (NA) (D) (D) : Other States 2/ ........: (X) 209,683 199,758 : United States ..........: (NA) 209,683 219,908 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per cwt ----- ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : Fresh market : Arizona ................: 23.00 31.70 (D) 20,332 51,196 (D) California .............: 27.10 27.60 (D) 158,942 158,976 (D) Colorado 1/ ............: 16.90 (NA) (NA) 11,036 (NA) (NA) Florida ................: 12.50 18.40 15.50 33,825 49,422 41,983 Georgia ................: 10.50 (D) (D) 13,209 (D) (D) Michigan ...............: 17.00 (D) (D) 16,269 (D) (D) New Jersey 1/ ..........: 18.40 (NA) (NA) 11,482 (NA) (NA) New York ...............: 18.40 (D) 15.00 59,616 (D) 45,623 North Carolina .........: 13.00 18.40 15.10 6,864 13,073 10,570 Ohio 1/ ................: 10.00 (NA) (NA) 4,070 (NA) (NA) : Pennsylvania 1/ ........: 21.30 (NA) (NA) 4,430 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 17.00 18.00 17.80 30,855 35,910 32,574 Virginia 1/ ............: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) Wisconsin ..............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) : Other States 2/ ........: 17.80 16.30 23.40 18,410 99,483 252,659 : United States ..........: 19.30 21.60 20.10 389,340 408,060 383,409 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Cabbage Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per ton ----- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : Processing : Arizona ................: (NA) (X) (D) (NA) - (D) California .............: (NA) (X) (D) (NA) - (D) Florida ................: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Georgia ................: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Michigan ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) New York ...............: (NA) (D) 150.00 (NA) (D) 3,023 North Carolina .........: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Texas ..................: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Wisconsin ..............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) : Other States 2/ ........: (X) 228.00 212.00 (X) 47,778 42,292 : United States ..........: (NA) 228.00 206.00 (NA) 47,778 45,315 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Estimates discontinued in 2016. 2/ Includes data withheld above. Cantaloupes for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : Fresh Market : Arizona ................: 14,600 (NA) (NA) 14,500 (NA) (NA) California .............: 28,500 (NA) (NA) 28,000 (NA) (NA) Colorado ...............: 600 (NA) (NA) 500 (NA) (NA) Georgia ................: 3,300 (NA) (NA) 2,800 (NA) (NA) Indiana ................: 1,800 (NA) (NA) 1,700 (NA) (NA) Maryland ...............: 550 (NA) (NA) 500 (NA) (NA) Pennsylvania ...........: 1,200 (NA) (NA) 1,200 (NA) (NA) South Carolina .........: 1,200 (NA) (NA) 1,100 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 2,000 (NA) (NA) 1,800 (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: 53,750 (NA) (NA) 52,100 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : All : Arizona ................: (NA) 16,000 16,000 (NA) 15,900 15,700 California .............: (NA) 30,000 29,700 (NA) 29,500 29,700 Florida ................: (NA) 2,400 2,300 (NA) 2,300 2,200 Georgia ................: (NA) 3,500 3,400 (NA) 3,400 3,300 Indiana ................: (NA) 1,800 1,800 (NA) 1,700 1,700 North Carolina .........: (NA) 1,200 1,200 (NA) 1,100 1,100 Pennsylvania ...........: (NA) 1,000 1,000 (NA) 1,000 950 South Carolina .........: (NA) 1,700 1,200 (NA) 1,600 1,100 Texas ..................: (NA) 1,700 1,400 (NA) 1,500 1,300 : United States ..........: (NA) 59,300 58,000 (NA) 58,000 57,050 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : cwt : Fresh Market : Arizona ................: 245.0 (NA) (NA) California .............: 300.0 (NA) (NA) Colorado ...............: 245.0 (NA) (NA) Georgia ................: 180.0 (NA) (NA) Indiana ................: 160.0 (NA) (NA) Maryland ...............: 120.0 (NA) (NA) Pennsylvania ...........: 128.0 (NA) (NA) South Carolina .........: 245.0 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 120.0 (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: 260.0 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----------- cwt ---------- --------- 1,000 cwt -------- : All : Arizona ................: (NA) 235.0 225.0 (NA) 3,736.5 3,532.5 California .............: (NA) 300.0 275.0 (NA) 8,850.0 8,167.5 Florida ................: (NA) 270.0 260.0 (NA) 621.0 572.0 Georgia ................: (NA) 170.0 110.0 (NA) 578.0 363.0 Indiana ................: (NA) 185.0 200.0 (NA) 314.5 340.0 North Carolina .........: (NA) 188.0 205.0 (NA) 206.8 225.5 Pennsylvania ...........: (NA) 135.0 145.0 (NA) 135.0 137.8 South Carolina .........: (NA) 215.0 310.0 (NA) 344.0 341.0 Texas ..................: (NA) 125.0 110.0 (NA) 187.5 143.0 : United States ..........: (NA) 258.2 242.3 (NA) 14,973.3 13,822.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Cantaloupes for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ---------- cwt ---------- --------- 1,000 cwt -------- : All : Arizona ................: (NA) - - (NA) 3,736.5 3,532.5 California .............: (NA) - - (NA) 8,850.0 8,167.5 Florida ................: (NA) - - (NA) 621.0 572.0 Georgia ................: (NA) - - (NA) 578.0 363.0 Indiana ................: (NA) - - (NA) 314.5 340.0 North Carolina .........: (NA) - - (NA) 206.8 225.5 Pennsylvania ...........: (NA) - 2.8 (NA) 135.0 135.0 South Carolina .........: (NA) - - (NA) 344.0 341.0 Texas ..................: (NA) - - (NA) 187.5 143.0 : United States ..........: (NA) - 2.8 (NA) 14,973.3 13,819.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : --------- dollars -------- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : All : Arizona ................: (NA) 16.90 23.90 (NA) 63,147 84,427 California .............: (NA) 16.10 16.50 (NA) 142,485 134,764 Florida ................: (NA) 19.10 18.00 (NA) 11,861 10,296 Georgia ................: (NA) 19.10 24.60 (NA) 11,040 8,930 Indiana ................: (NA) 23.00 24.00 (NA) 7,234 8,160 North Carolina .........: (NA) 32.00 26.00 (NA) 6,618 5,863 Pennsylvania ...........: (NA) 27.00 32.90 (NA) 3,645 4,442 South Carolina .........: (NA) 21.40 20.50 (NA) 7,362 6,991 Texas ..................: (NA) 22.00 24.00 (NA) 4,125 3,432 : United States ..........: (NA) 17.20 19.30 (NA) 257,517 267,305 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. Cantaloupe Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh market : Arizona ................: 3,553.0 3,736.5 3,532.5 California .............: 8,400.0 8,850.0 8,167.5 Colorado 1/ ............: 123.0 (NA) (NA) Florida 2/ .............: (NA) 621.0 572.0 Georgia ................: 504.0 578.0 363.0 Indiana ................: 272.0 314.5 340.0 Maryland 1/ ............: 60.0 (NA) (NA) North Carolina 2/ ......: (NA) 206.8 225.5 Pennsylvania ...........: 154.0 135.0 135.0 South Carolina .........: 270.0 344.0 341.0 Texas ..................: 216.0 187.5 143.0 : United States ..........: 13,552.0 14,973.3 13,819.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : Arizona ................: (NA) - - California .............: (NA) - - Florida ................: (NA) - - Georgia ................: (NA) - - Indiana ................: (NA) - - North Carolina .........: (NA) - - Pennsylvania ...........: (NA) - - South Carolina .........: (NA) - - Texas ..................: (NA) - - : United States ..........: (NA) - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per cwt ------ ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : Fresh market : Arizona ................: 22.90 16.90 23.90 81,364 63,147 84,427 California .............: 17.40 16.10 16.50 146,160 142,485 134,764 Colorado 1/ ............: 31.00 (NA) (NA) 3,813 (NA) (NA) Florida 2/ .............: (NA) 19.10 18.00 (NA) 11,861 10,296 Georgia ................: 17.30 19.10 24.60 8,719 11,040 8,930 Indiana ................: 28.00 23.00 24.00 7,616 7,234 8,160 Maryland 1/ ............: 28.00 (NA) (NA) 1,680 (NA) (NA) North Carolina 2/ ......: (NA) 32.00 26.00 (NA) 6,618 5,863 Pennsylvania ...........: 31.20 27.00 32.90 4,805 3,645 4,442 South Carolina .........: 11.50 21.40 20.50 3,105 7,362 6,991 Texas ..................: 31.80 22.00 24.00 6,869 4,125 3,432 : United States ..........: 19.50 17.20 19.30 264,131 257,517 267,305 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Cantaloupe Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ---- dollars per ton ---- ----- 1,000 dollars ---- : Processing : Arizona ................: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - California .............: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Florida ................: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Georgia ................: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Indiana ................: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - North Carolina .........: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Pennsylvania ...........: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - South Carolina .........: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Texas ..................: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - : United States ..........: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Estimates discontinued in 2016. 2/ Estimates began in 2016. Carrots for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : Fresh market : California .............: 67,000 (NA) (NA) 66,000 (NA) (NA) Colorado ...............: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) Georgia ................: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 1,800 (NA) (NA) 1,500 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) Washington .............: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) : Other States 1/ ........: 7,200 (X) (X) 7,050 (X) (X) : United States ..........: 76,000 (NA) (NA) 74,550 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : Processing : Wisconsin ..............: 3,900 (NA) (NA) 3,800 (NA) (NA) : Other States 2/ ........: 7,700 (X) (X) 7,220 (X) (X) : United States ..........: 11,600 (NA) (NA) 11,020 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : All : California .............: (NA) 61,000 62,500 (NA) 60,000 58,500 Michigan ...............: (NA) 4,000 4,100 (NA) 3,900 4,000 Texas ..................: (NA) 1,300 1,200 (NA) 1,200 1,100 Washington .............: (NA) 7,200 6,400 (NA) 7,100 6,300 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 4,600 4,500 (NA) 4,500 4,500 : United States ..........: (NA) 78,100 78,700 (NA) 76,700 74,400 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : cwt : Fresh market : California .............: 318.0 (NA) (NA) Colorado ...............: (D) (NA) (NA) Georgia ................: (D) (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 240.0 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: (D) (NA) (NA) Washington .............: (D) (NA) (NA) : Other States 1/ ........: 623.0 (X) (X) : United States ..........: 345.0 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : Wisconsin ..............: 25.72 (NA) (NA) : Other States 2/ ........: 27.18 (X) (X) : United States ..........: 26.68 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Carrots for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----------- cwt ---------- --------- 1,000 cwt -------- : All : California .............: (NA) 385.0 370.0 (NA) 23,100.0 21,645.0 Michigan ...............: (NA) 340.0 370.0 (NA) 1,326.0 1,480.0 Texas ..................: (NA) 295.0 240.0 (NA) 354.0 264.0 Washington .............: (NA) 630.0 700.0 (NA) 4,473.0 4,410.0 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 500.0 560.0 (NA) 2,250.0 2,520.0 : United States ..........: (NA) 410.7 407.5 (NA) 31,503.0 30,319.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : All : California .............: (NA) - - (NA) 23,100.0 21,645.0 Michigan ...............: (NA) - - (NA) 1,326.0 1,480.0 Texas ..................: (NA) - - (NA) 354.0 264.0 Washington .............: (NA) - - (NA) 4,473.0 4,410.0 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) - 5.0 (NA) 2,250.0 2,515.0 : United States ..........: (NA) - 5.0 (NA) 31,503.0 30,314.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : --------- dollars -------- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : All : California .............: (NA) 31.30 29.40 (NA) 722,395 635,624 Michigan ...............: (NA) 9.58 10.10 (NA) 12,700 14,948 Texas ..................: (NA) 11.20 10.50 (NA) 3,965 2,762 Washington .............: (NA) 7.72 6.52 (NA) 34,528 28,771 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 4.71 3.51 (NA) 10,588 8,820 : United States ..........: (NA) 24.90 22.80 (NA) 784,176 690,925 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Includes data withheld above. 2/ Includes data withheld above and/or data for States not listed in this table. Carrot Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh market : California .............: 20,988.0 (D) (D) Colorado 1/ ............: (D) (NA) (NA) Georgia 1/ .............: (D) (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 360.0 (D) (D) Texas ..................: (D) (D) (D) Washington .............: (D) (D) (D) Wisconsin 2/ ...........: (NA) 13.5 2.5 : Other States 3/ ........: 4,392.0 22,186.9 20,807.6 : United States ..........: 25,740.0 22,200.4 20,810.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : California .............: (D) (D) (D) Michigan ...............: (D) (D) (D) Texas ..................: (D) (D) (D) Washington .............: (D) (D) (D) Wisconsin ..............: 97,730 111,825 125,622 : Other States 4/ ........: 196,270 353,307 349,573 : United States ..........: 294,000 465,132 475,195 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per cwt ------ ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : Fresh market : California .............: 31.50 (D) (D) 661,122 (D) (D) Colorado 1/ ............: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) Georgia 1/ .............: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 20.00 (D) (D) 7,200 (D) (D) Texas ..................: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Washington .............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Wisconsin 2/ ...........: (NA) 110.00 111.00 (NA) 1,485 278 : Other States 3/ ........: 26.40 32.10 30.10 115,943 712,551 627,022 : United States ..........: 30.50 32.20 30.10 784,265 714,036 627,300 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per ton ----- ------- 1,000 dollars ------ : Processing : California .............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Michigan ...............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Texas ..................: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Washington .............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Wisconsin ..............: 98.80 81.40 68.00 9,652 9,103 8,542 : Other States 4/ ........: 135.00 173.00 158.00 26,443 61,037 55,083 : United States ..........: 123.00 151.00 134.00 36,095 70,140 63,625 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. 1/ Estimates discontinued in 2016. 2/ Estimates began in 2016. 3/ Includes data withheld above. 4/ In 2015, includes data withheld above and/or data for States not listed in this table. In 2016 and 2017, includes data withheld above. Cauliflower for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Area planted : Area harvested State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : acres : Arizona ........: 4,500 4,500 5,300 4,500 4,500 5,200 California .....: 32,600 35,500 37,800 32,300 35,500 37,000 New York 1/ ....: 500 (NA) (NA) 410 (NA) (NA) : United States ..: 37,600 40,000 43,100 37,210 40,000 42,200 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Yield per acre : Total production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ------------ cwt ----------- -------- 1,000 cwt -------- : Arizona ........: 155.0 175.0 195.0 (NA) 787.5 1,014.0 California .....: 180.0 180.0 200.0 (NA) 6,390.0 7,400.0 New York 1/ ....: 110.0 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) : United States ..: 176.0 179.4 199.4 (NA) 7,177.5 8,414.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Harvested not sold : Utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 cwt : Arizona ........: (NA) - - 700.0 787.5 1,014.0 California .....: (NA) - 22.2 5,814.0 6,390.0 7,377.8 New York 1/ ....: (NA) (NA) (NA) 45.0 (NA) (NA) : United States ..: (NA) - 22.2 6,559.0 7,177.5 8,391.8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ---------- dollars --------- ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : Arizona ........: 77.30 79.40 81.70 54,110 62,493 82,844 California .....: 59.40 52.50 41.20 345,382 335,601 304,107 New York 1/ ....: 50.10 (NA) (NA) 2,255 (NA) (NA) : United States ..: 61.30 55.50 46.10 401,747 398,094 386,951 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. 1/ Estimates discontinued in 2016. Cauliflower Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt Fresh market : Arizona ................: 700.0 (D) 1,014.0 California .............: 5,766.0 (D) 7,044.8 New York 1/ ............: 45.0 (NA) (NA) : Other States 2/ ........: - 7,005.1 - : United States ..........: 6,511.0 7,005.1 8,058.8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons Processing : Arizona ................: - (D) - California .............: 2,400 (D) 16,650 New York 1/ ............: - (NA) (NA) : Other States 2/ ........: - 8,622 - : United States ..........: 2,400 8,622 16,650 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per cwt ----- ------- 1,000 dollars ------- Fresh market : Arizona ................: 77.30 (D) 81.70 54,110 (D) 82,844 California .............: 59.70 (D) 42.00 344,230 (D) 295,882 New York 1/ ............: 50.10 (NA) (NA) 2,255 (NA) (NA) : Other States 2/ ........: (X) 55.60 (X) - 389,561 - : United States ..........: 61.50 55.60 47.00 400,595 389,561 378,726 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per ton ----- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ Processing : Arizona ................: (X) (D) (X) - (D) - California .............: 480.00 (D) 494.00 1,152 (D) 8,225 New York 1/ ............: (X) (NA) (NA) - (NA) (NA) : Other States 2/ ........: (X) 990.00 (X) - 8,533 - : United States ..........: 480.00 990.00 494.00 1,152 8,533 8,225 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Estimates discontinued in 2016. 2/ Includes data withheld above. Celery for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : California .............: 26,400 28,800 23,700 26,100 28,400 23,500 Michigan ...............: 1,700 1,600 1,700 1,600 1,500 1,600 : United States ..........: 28,100 30,400 25,400 27,700 29,900 25,100 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----------- cwt ----------- --------- 1,000 cwt -------- : California .............: 620.0 580.0 625.0 (NA) 16,472.0 14,687.5 Michigan ...............: 580.0 600.0 590.0 (NA) 900.0 944.0 : United States ..........: 618.0 581.0 622.8 (NA) 17,372.0 15,631.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : California .............: (NA) - 44.1 16,180.0 16,472.0 14,643.4 Michigan ...............: (NA) - - 930.0 900.0 944.0 : United States ..........: (NA) - 44.1 17,110.0 17,372.0 15,587.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : --------- dollars --------- ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : California .............: 25.10 18.30 20.60 405,767 302,181 302,067 Michigan ...............: 20.30 14.00 13.40 18,897 12,605 12,675 : United States ..........: 24.80 18.10 20.20 424,664 314,786 314,742 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. Celery Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh market : California .............: (NA) (D) (D) Michigan ...............: (NA) (D) (D) : Other States 1/ ........: (X) 16,615.3 15,055.5 : United States ..........: (NA) 16,615.3 15,055.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : California .............: (NA) (D) (D) Michigan ...............: (NA) (D) (D) : Other States 1/ ........: (X) 37,833 26,596 : United States ..........: (NA) 37,833 26,596 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per cwt ----- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : Fresh market : California .............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Michigan ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) : Other States 1/ ........: (X) 18.50 20.60 (X) 307,110 309,424 : United States ..........: (NA) 18.50 20.60 (NA) 307,110 309,424 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per ton ----- ------ 1,000 dollars ----- : Processing : California .............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Michigan ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) : Other States 1/ ........: (X) 203.00 200.00 (X) 7,676 5,318 : United States ..........: (NA) 203.00 200.00 (NA) 7,676 5,318 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Includes data withheld above. Sweet Corn for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : Fresh market : Alabama ................: 1,200 (NA) (NA) 1,000 (NA) (NA) California .............: 30,000 (NA) (NA) 29,900 (NA) (NA) Colorado ...............: 3,500 (NA) (NA) 3,400 (NA) (NA) Connecticut ............: 3,900 (NA) (NA) 3,600 (NA) (NA) Delaware ...............: 3,700 (NA) (NA) 3,600 (NA) (NA) Florida ................: 41,500 (NA) (NA) 36,900 (NA) (NA) Georgia ................: 26,500 (NA) (NA) 25,700 (NA) (NA) Illinois ...............: 6,600 (NA) (NA) 6,100 (NA) (NA) Indiana ................: 5,500 (NA) (NA) 5,100 (NA) (NA) Maine ..................: 1,500 (NA) (NA) 1,400 (NA) (NA) : Maryland ...............: 3,700 (NA) (NA) 3,600 (NA) (NA) Massachusetts ..........: 3,400 (NA) (NA) 3,300 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 9,500 (NA) (NA) 9,000 (NA) (NA) New Hampshire ..........: 1,400 (NA) (NA) 1,300 (NA) (NA) New Jersey .............: 6,000 (NA) (NA) 5,800 (NA) (NA) New York ...............: 18,100 (NA) (NA) 16,700 (NA) (NA) North Carolina .........: 5,100 (NA) (NA) 4,600 (NA) (NA) Ohio ...................: 15,500 (NA) (NA) 14,500 (NA) (NA) Oregon .................: 7,000 (NA) (NA) 6,900 (NA) (NA) Pennsylvania ...........: 10,300 (NA) (NA) 9,300 (NA) (NA) : Rhode Island ...........: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 4,400 (NA) (NA) 4,200 (NA) (NA) Vermont ................: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) Virginia ...............: 3,000 (NA) (NA) 2,900 (NA) (NA) Washington .............: 25,500 (NA) (NA) 25,300 (NA) (NA) Wisconsin ..............: 3,900 (NA) (NA) 3,700 (NA) (NA) : Other States 1/ ........: 1,390 (X) (X) 1,290 (X) (X) : United States ..........: 242,090 (NA) (NA) 229,090 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : Processing : Minnesota ..............: 115,500 (NA) (NA) 103,200 (NA) (NA) Oregon .................: 21,500 (NA) (NA) 21,200 (NA) (NA) Washington .............: 79,100 (NA) (NA) 78,800 (NA) (NA) Wisconsin ..............: 64,700 (NA) (NA) 60,700 (NA) (NA) : Other States 2/ ........: 44,300 (X) (X) 43,600 (X) (X) : United States ..........: 325,100 (NA) (NA) 307,500 (NA) (NA) : Canning ................: 138,610 (NA) (NA) 133,710 (NA) (NA) : Freezing ...............: 186,490 (NA) (NA) 173,790 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Sweet Corn for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : All : California .............: (NA) 35,000 37,000 (NA) 34,900 36,400 Delaware ...............: (NA) 10,000 11,000 (NA) 9,800 10,800 Florida ................: (NA) 37,600 41,700 (NA) 34,500 39,000 Georgia ................: (NA) 27,000 26,000 (NA) 26,000 25,100 Idaho ..................: (NA) 4,300 4,100 (NA) 4,200 3,900 Illinois ...............: (NA) 15,500 15,000 (NA) 14,600 14,200 Indiana ................: (NA) 6,200 5,800 (NA) 5,800 5,400 Maryland ...............: (NA) 7,300 7,200 (NA) 7,200 7,100 Michigan ...............: (NA) 9,800 9,600 (NA) 9,200 9,100 Minnesota ..............: (NA) 120,000 120,700 (NA) 114,000 112,600 : New Jersey .............: (NA) 6,700 6,300 (NA) 6,400 6,200 New York ...............: (NA) 28,900 26,700 (NA) 26,600 25,700 Ohio ...................: (NA) 15,000 14,000 (NA) 14,000 13,300 Oregon .................: (NA) 25,000 23,500 (NA) 24,900 23,300 Pennsylvania ...........: (NA) 9,000 9,300 (NA) 8,300 8,700 Washington .............: (NA) 94,200 88,400 (NA) 93,500 87,800 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 61,500 56,700 (NA) 60,300 54,500 : United States ..........: (NA) 513,000 503,000 (NA) 494,200 483,100 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : cwt : Fresh market : Alabama ................: 55.0 (NA) (NA) California .............: 190.0 (NA) (NA) Colorado ...............: 180.0 (NA) (NA) Connecticut ............: 58.0 (NA) (NA) Delaware ...............: 108.0 (NA) (NA) Florida ................: 140.0 (NA) (NA) Georgia ................: 140.0 (NA) (NA) Illinois ...............: 95.0 (NA) (NA) Indiana ................: 55.0 (NA) (NA) Maine ..................: 61.0 (NA) (NA) : Maryland ...............: 60.0 (NA) (NA) Massachusetts ..........: 76.0 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 103.0 (NA) (NA) New Hampshire ..........: 68.0 (NA) (NA) New Jersey .............: 90.0 (NA) (NA) New York ...............: 84.0 (NA) (NA) North Carolina .........: 85.0 (NA) (NA) Ohio ...................: 75.0 (NA) (NA) Oregon .................: 180.0 (NA) (NA) Pennsylvania ...........: 67.0 (NA) (NA) : Rhode Island ...........: (D) (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 79.0 (NA) (NA) Vermont ................: (D) (NA) (NA) Virginia ...............: 81.0 (NA) (NA) Washington .............: 136.0 (NA) (NA) Wisconsin ..............: 129.0 (NA) (NA) : Other States 1/ ........: 47.0 (X) (X) : United States ..........: 122.0 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Sweet Corn for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : Minnesota ..............: 7.38 (NA) (NA) Oregon .................: 9.37 (NA) (NA) Washington .............: 9.17 (NA) (NA) Wisconsin ..............: 8.08 (NA) (NA) : Other States 2/ ........: 7.24 (X) (X) : United States ..........: 8.09 (NA) (NA) : Canning ................: 7.72 (NA) (NA) : Freezing ...............: 8.38 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----------- cwt ---------- --------- 1,000 cwt -------- : All : California .............: (NA) 170.0 190.0 (NA) 5,933.0 6,916.0 Delaware ...............: (NA) 125.0 140.0 (NA) 1,225.0 1,512.0 Florida ................: (NA) 145.0 140.0 (NA) 5,002.5 5,460.0 Georgia ................: (NA) 150.0 160.0 (NA) 3,900.0 4,016.0 Idaho ..................: (NA) 110.0 110.0 (NA) 462.0 429.0 Illinois ...............: (NA) 145.0 135.0 (NA) 2,117.0 1,917.0 Indiana ................: (NA) 72.0 90.0 (NA) 417.6 486.0 Maryland ...............: (NA) 155.0 125.0 (NA) 1,116.0 887.5 Michigan ...............: (NA) 93.0 100.0 (NA) 855.6 910.0 Minnesota ..............: (NA) 140.0 165.0 (NA) 15,960.0 18,579.0 : New Jersey .............: (NA) 86.0 97.0 (NA) 550.4 601.4 New York ...............: (NA) 95.0 130.0 (NA) 2,527.0 3,341.0 Ohio ...................: (NA) 82.0 90.0 (NA) 1,148.0 1,197.0 Oregon .................: (NA) 195.0 190.0 (NA) 4,855.5 4,427.0 Pennsylvania ...........: (NA) 65.0 64.0 (NA) 539.5 556.8 Washington .............: (NA) 200.0 210.0 (NA) 18,700.0 18,438.0 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 170.0 176.0 (NA) 10,251.0 9,592.0 : United States ..........: (NA) 152.9 164.1 (NA) 75,560.1 79,265.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Sweet Corn for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : All : California .............: (NA) - - (NA) 5,933.0 6,916.0 Delaware ...............: (NA) - - (NA) 1,225.0 1,512.0 Florida ................: (NA) - - (NA) 5,002.5 5,460.0 Georgia ................: (NA) - 80.3 (NA) 3,900.0 3,935.7 Idaho ..................: (NA) - 1.3 (NA) 462.0 427.7 Illinois ...............: (NA) - - (NA) 2,117.0 1,917.0 Indiana ................: (NA) - - (NA) 417.6 486.0 Maryland ...............: (NA) - 4.4 (NA) 1,116.0 883.1 Michigan ...............: (NA) - - (NA) 855.6 910.0 Minnesota ..............: (NA) - 111.5 (NA) 15,960.0 18,467.5 : New Jersey .............: (NA) - 3.6 (NA) 550.4 597.8 New York ...............: (NA) - 33.4 (NA) 2,527.0 3,307.6 Ohio ...................: (NA) - 13.2 (NA) 1,148.0 1,183.8 Oregon .................: (NA) - - (NA) 4,855.5 4,427.0 Pennsylvania ...........: (NA) - 3.9 (NA) 539.5 552.9 Washington .............: (NA) - 55.3 (NA) 18,700.0 18,382.7 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) - 9.6 (NA) 10,251.0 9,582.4 : United States ..........: (NA) - 316.5 (NA) 75,560.1 78,949.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : --------- dollars -------- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : All : California .............: (NA) 27.60 30.80 (NA) 163,751 213,013 Delaware ...............: (NA) 11.60 12.90 (NA) 14,262 19,439 Florida ................: (NA) 32.00 29.00 (NA) 160,080 158,340 Georgia ................: (NA) 22.50 25.00 (NA) 87,750 98,393 Idaho ..................: (NA) 22.40 27.00 (NA) 10,352 11,548 Illinois ...............: (NA) 8.01 6.15 (NA) 16,962 11,792 Indiana ................: (NA) 31.00 26.00 (NA) 12,946 12,636 Maryland ...............: (NA) 11.80 13.20 (NA) 13,121 11,647 Michigan ...............: (NA) 25.50 23.00 (NA) 21,818 20,930 Minnesota ..............: (NA) 4.61 4.30 (NA) 73,592 79,361 : New Jersey .............: (NA) 29.00 30.20 (NA) 15,983 18,042 New York ...............: (NA) 19.30 9.67 (NA) 48,720 31,992 Ohio ...................: (NA) 32.80 26.00 (NA) 37,654 30,779 Oregon .................: (NA) 8.93 7.99 (NA) 43,343 35,372 Pennsylvania ...........: (NA) 35.90 38.60 (NA) 19,351 21,365 Washington .............: (NA) 5.54 6.12 (NA) 103,658 112,445 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 4.78 4.65 (NA) 48,958 44,537 : United States ..........: (NA) 11.80 11.80 (NA) 892,301 931,631 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Includes data withheld above. 2/ Includes data withheld above and/or States not listed in this table. Sweet Corn Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh market : Alabama 1/ .............: 55.0 (NA) (NA) California .............: 5,681.0 5,933.0 6,916.0 Colorado 1/ ............: 612.0 (NA) (NA) Connecticut 1/ .........: 209.0 (NA) (NA) Delaware ...............: 389.0 (D) 423.4 Florida ................: 5,166.0 5,002.5 5,460.0 Georgia ................: 3,598.0 3,900.0 3,935.7 Idaho 2/ ...............: (NA) (D) (D) Illinois ...............: 580.0 296.4 210.9 Indiana ................: 281.0 417.6 486.0 : Maine 1/ ...............: 85.0 (NA) (NA) Maryland ...............: 216.0 (D) 353.2 Massachusetts 1/ .......: 251.0 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 927.0 855.6 910.0 Minnesota 2/ ...........: (NA) 351.1 668.8 New Hampshire 1/ .......: 88.0 (NA) (NA) New Jersey .............: 522.0 478.8 501.6 New York ...............: 1,403.0 (D) 795.2 North Carolina 1/ ......: 391.0 (NA) (NA) Ohio ...................: 1,088.0 1,148.0 1,183.8 : Oregon .................: 1,242.0 (D) 442.7 Pennsylvania ...........: 623.0 (D) (D) Rhode Island 1/ ........: (D) (NA) (NA) Texas 1/ ...............: 332.0 (NA) (NA) Vermont 1/ .............: (D) (NA) (NA) Virginia 1/ ............: 235.0 (NA) (NA) Washington .............: 3,441.0 523.6 958.8 Wisconsin ..............: 477.0 574.1 402.9 : Other States 3/ ........: 60.0 3,866.0 977.8 : United States ..........: 27,952.0 23,346.7 24,626.8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : California .............: (D) - - Delaware ...............: (D) (D) 54,432 Florida ................: (D) - - Georgia ................: (D) - - Idaho ..................: (D) (D) (D) Illinois ...............: (D) 91,031 85,307 Indiana ................: (D) - - Maryland ...............: (D) (D) 26,492 Michigan ...............: (D) - - Minnesota ..............: 761,320 780,444 889,934 : New Jersey .............: (D) 3,578 4,811 New York ...............: (D) (D) 125,622 Ohio ...................: (D) - - Oregon .................: 198,610 (D) 199,215 Pennsylvania ...........: (D) (D) (D) Washington .............: 722,240 908,820 871,196 Wisconsin ..............: 490,230 483,847 458,977 : Other States 4/ ........: 315,710 342,946 139 : United States ..........: 2,488,110 2,610,666 2,716,125 : Canning 1/ .............: 1,031,640 (NA) (NA) : Freezing 1/ ............: 1,456,470 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Sweet Corn Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per cwt ------ ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : Fresh market : Alabama 1/ .............: 26.50 (NA) (NA) 1,458 (NA) (NA) California .............: 28.00 27.60 30.80 159,068 163,751 213,013 Colorado 1/ ............: 15.20 (NA) (NA) 9,302 (NA) (NA) Connecticut 1/ .........: 50.00 (NA) (NA) 10,450 (NA) (NA) Delaware ...............: 22.00 (D) 31.00 8,558 (D) 13,125 Florida ................: 30.00 32.00 29.00 154,980 160,080 158,340 Georgia ................: 21.40 22.50 25.00 76,997 87,750 98,393 Idaho 2/ ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Illinois ...............: 16.80 34.50 25.90 9,744 10,226 5,462 Indiana ................: 43.00 31.00 26.00 12,083 12,946 12,636 : Maine 1/ ...............: 45.00 (NA) (NA) 3,825 (NA) (NA) Maryland ...............: 28.00 (D) 26.00 6,048 (D) 9,183 Massachusetts 1/ .......: 40.00 (NA) (NA) 10,040 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 26.00 25.50 23.00 24,102 21,818 20,930 Minnesota 2/ ...........: (NA) 34.00 33.50 (NA) 11,937 22,405 New Hampshire 1/ .......: 55.00 (NA) (NA) 4,840 (NA) (NA) New Jersey .............: 32.20 32.50 35.00 16,808 15,561 17,556 New York ...............: 22.40 (D) 28.70 31,427 (D) 22,822 North Carolina 1/ ......: 31.00 (NA) (NA) 12,121 (NA) (NA) Ohio ...................: 28.00 32.80 26.00 30,464 37,654 30,779 : Oregon .................: 23.00 (D) 29.50 28,566 (D) 13,060 Pennsylvania ...........: 38.50 (D) (D) 23,986 (D) (D) Rhode Island 1/ ........: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) Texas 1/ ...............: 21.50 (NA) (NA) 7,138 (NA) (NA) Vermont 1/ .............: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) Virginia 1/ ............: 31.00 (NA) (NA) 7,285 (NA) (NA) Washington .............: 35.00 24.40 35.50 120,435 12,776 34,037 Wisconsin ..............: 29.30 27.80 30.80 13,976 15,960 12,409 : Other States 3/ ........: 64.70 29.00 33.60 3,880 112,029 32,892 : United States ..........: 28.20 28.40 29.10 787,581 662,488 717,042 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Sweet Corn Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per ton ----- ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : Processing : California .............: (D) (X) (X) (D) - - Delaware ...............: (D) (D) 116.00 (D) (D) 6,314 Florida ................: (D) (X) (X) (D) - - Georgia ................: (D) (X) (X) (D) - - Idaho ..................: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Illinois ...............: (D) 74.00 74.20 (D) 6,736 6,330 Indiana ................: (D) (X) (X) (D) - - Maryland ...............: (D) (D) 93.00 (D) (D) 2,464 Michigan ...............: (D) (X) (X) (D) - - Minnesota ..............: 96.20 79.00 64.00 73,214 61,655 56,956 : New Jersey .............: (D) 118.00 101.00 (D) 422 486 New York ...............: (D) (D) 73.00 (D) (D) 9,170 Ohio ...................: (D) (X) (X) (D) - - Oregon .................: 140.00 (D) 112.00 27,818 (D) 22,312 Pennsylvania ...........: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Washington .............: 106.00 100.00 90.00 76,306 90,882 78,408 Wisconsin ..............: 87.90 68.20 70.00 43,085 32,998 32,128 : Other States 4/ ........: 111.00 108.00 151.00 35,057 37,120 21 : United States ..........: 103.00 88.00 79.00 255,480 229,813 214,589 : Canning 1/ .............: 97.80 (NA) (NA) 100,884 (NA) (NA) : Freezing 1/ ............: 106.00 (NA) (NA) 154,596 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Estimates discontinued in 2016. 2/ Estimates began in 2016. 3/ Includes data withheld above. 4/ In 2015, includes data withheld above and/or data for States not listed in this table. In 2016 and 2017, includes data withheld above. Cucumbers for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : Fresh market : California .............: 3,500 (NA) (NA) 3,500 (NA) (NA) Florida ................: 11,000 (NA) (NA) 10,600 (NA) (NA) Georgia ................: 7,700 (NA) (NA) 6,900 (NA) (NA) Maryland ...............: 470 (NA) (NA) 460 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 3,800 (NA) (NA) 3,700 (NA) (NA) New Jersey .............: 3,300 (NA) (NA) 3,200 (NA) (NA) New York ...............: 2,000 (NA) (NA) 1,900 (NA) (NA) North Carolina .........: 4,900 (NA) (NA) 4,800 (NA) (NA) South Carolina .........: 1,400 (NA) (NA) 1,100 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 1,600 (NA) (NA) 1,500 (NA) (NA) Virginia ...............: 350 (NA) (NA) 320 (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: 40,020 (NA) (NA) 37,980 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : Processing : Florida ................: 18,280 (NA) (NA) 18,010 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 30,000 (NA) (NA) 29,000 (NA) (NA) Ohio ...................: 5,000 (NA) (NA) 5,000 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 4,150 (NA) (NA) 3,950 (NA) (NA) Wisconsin ..............: 5,600 (NA) (NA) 5,400 (NA) (NA) : Other States 1/ ........: 24,430 (X) (X) 23,750 (X) (X) : United States ..........: 87,460 (NA) (NA) 85,110 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : All : Alabama ................: (NA) 3,600 5,600 (NA) 3,500 5,400 California .............: (NA) 9,000 9,400 (NA) 9,000 9,400 Delaware ...............: (NA) 2,700 (D) (NA) 2,600 (D) Florida ................: (NA) 24,300 26,000 (NA) 21,700 25,900 Georgia ................: (NA) 8,900 9,500 (NA) 8,200 9,500 Michigan ...............: (NA) 41,000 38,000 (NA) 40,400 37,500 New Jersey .............: (NA) 3,200 3,000 (NA) 3,100 2,900 North Carolina .........: (NA) 11,000 10,500 (NA) 10,800 10,500 Ohio ...................: (NA) 6,000 6,000 (NA) 5,400 5,700 South Carolina .........: (NA) 2,600 (D) (NA) 2,500 (D) Texas ..................: (NA) 7,500 7,500 (NA) 7,100 6,800 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 5,600 5,700 (NA) 5,500 5,500 : Other States 2/ ........: (X) - 4,600 (X) - 4,500 : United States ..........: (NA) 125,400 125,800 (NA) 119,800 123,600 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Cucumbers for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : cwt : Fresh market : California .............: 205.0 (NA) (NA) Florida ................: 160.0 (NA) (NA) Georgia ................: 250.0 (NA) (NA) Maryland ...............: 68.0 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 160.0 (NA) (NA) New Jersey .............: 215.0 (NA) (NA) New York ...............: 160.0 (NA) (NA) North Carolina .........: 145.0 (NA) (NA) South Carolina .........: 115.0 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 77.0 (NA) (NA) Virginia ...............: 100.0 (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: 177.0 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : Florida ................: 8.22 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 5.90 (NA) (NA) Ohio ...................: 5.40 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 5.52 (NA) (NA) Wisconsin ..............: 6.09 (NA) (NA) : Other States 1/ ........: 5.58 (X) (X) : United States ..........: 6.27 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----------- cwt ---------- --------- 1,000 cwt -------- : All : Alabama ................: (NA) 94.0 140.0 (NA) 329.0 756.0 California .............: (NA) 180.0 175.0 (NA) 1,620.0 1,645.0 Delaware ...............: (NA) 89.0 (D) (NA) 231.4 (D) Florida ................: (NA) 180.0 205.0 (NA) 3,906.0 5,309.5 Georgia ................: (NA) 235.0 175.0 (NA) 1,927.0 1,662.5 Michigan ...............: (NA) 135.0 150.0 (NA) 5,454.0 5,625.0 New Jersey .............: (NA) 175.0 160.0 (NA) 542.5 464.0 North Carolina .........: (NA) 140.0 160.0 (NA) 1,512.0 1,680.0 Ohio ...................: (NA) 120.0 170.0 (NA) 648.0 969.0 South Carolina .........: (NA) 160.0 (D) (NA) 400.0 (D) Texas ..................: (NA) 105.0 100.0 (NA) 745.5 680.0 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 125.0 125.0 (NA) 687.5 687.5 : Other States 2/ ........: (X) (X) 100.0 (X) - 449.3 : United States ..........: (NA) 150.3 161.2 (NA) 18,002.9 19,927.8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Cucumbers for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : All : Alabama ................: (NA) - - (NA) 329.0 756.0 California .............: (NA) - - (NA) 1,620.0 1,645.0 Delaware ...............: (NA) - (D) (NA) 231.4 (D) Florida ................: (NA) - - (NA) 3,906.0 5,309.5 Georgia ................: (NA) - - (NA) 1,927.0 1,662.5 Michigan ...............: (NA) - - (NA) 5,454.0 5,625.0 New Jersey .............: (NA) - 0.9 (NA) 542.5 463.1 North Carolina .........: (NA) - 15.1 (NA) 1,512.0 1,664.9 Ohio ...................: (NA) - 22.3 (NA) 648.0 946.7 South Carolina .........: (NA) - (D) (NA) 400.0 (D) Texas ..................: (NA) - - (NA) 745.5 680.0 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) - 1.4 (NA) 687.5 686.1 : Other States 2/ ........: (X) - 1.1 (X) - 448.2 : United States ..........: (NA) - 40.8 (NA) 18,002.9 19,887.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : --------- dollars --------- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : All : Alabama ................: (NA) 13.50 22.00 (NA) 4,442 16,659 California .............: (NA) 22.70 24.70 (NA) 36,741 40,680 Delaware ...............: (NA) 15.60 (D) (NA) 3,620 (D) Florida ................: (NA) 30.30 25.90 (NA) 118,167 137,601 Georgia ................: (NA) 21.80 26.40 (NA) 41,924 43,853 Michigan ...............: (NA) 12.70 14.20 (NA) 69,146 79,739 New Jersey .............: (NA) 25.20 35.50 (NA) 13,645 16,431 North Carolina .........: (NA) 19.10 17.20 (NA) 28,913 28,699 Ohio ...................: (NA) 19.10 16.20 (NA) 12,405 15,324 South Carolina .........: (NA) 23.30 (D) (NA) 9,312 (D) Texas ..................: (NA) 18.10 19.00 (NA) 13,464 12,920 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 11.90 15.70 (NA) 8,166 10,749 : Other States 2/ ........: (X) (X) 18.10 (X) - 8,092 : United States ..........: (NA) 20.00 20.70 (NA) 359,945 410,747 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Includes data withheld above and/or States not listed in this table. 2/ Includes data withheld above. Cucumber Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh market : Alabama 1/ .............: (NA) (D) (D) California .............: 718.0 (D) (D) Delaware 1/ ............: (NA) (D) (D) Florida ................: 1,696.0 2,023.3 1,391.1 Georgia ................: 1,725.0 1,797.9 (D) Maryland 2/ ............: 31.0 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 592.0 1,292.6 871.9 New Jersey .............: 688.0 450.8 (D) New York 2/ ............: 304.0 (NA) (NA) North Carolina .........: 696.0 (D) 445.2 : Ohio 1/ ................: (NA) (D) 206.4 South Carolina .........: 127.0 340.4 (D) Texas ..................: 116.0 149.1 136.0 Virginia 2/ ............: 32.0 (NA) (NA) Wisconsin 1/ ...........: (NA) 15.1 (D) : Other States 3/ ........: - 1,523.4 2,268.7 : United States ..........: 6,725.0 7,592.6 5,319.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : Alabama ................: (D) (D) (D) California .............: (D) (D) (D) Delaware ...............: (D) (D) (D) Florida ................: 148,040 94,135 195,921 Georgia ................: (D) 6,455 (D) Michigan ...............: 171,100 208,070 237,656 New Jersey .............: (D) 4,584 (D) North Carolina .........: (D) (D) 60,984 Ohio ...................: 27,000 (D) 37,016 South Carolina .........: (D) 2,980 (D) Texas ..................: 21,800 29,820 27,200 Wisconsin ..............: 32,890 33,619 (D) : Other States 4/ ........: 132,630 140,857 169,605 : United States ..........: 533,460 520,520 728,382 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Cucumber Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per cwt ------ ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : Fresh market : Alabama 1/ .............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) California .............: 27.90 (D) (D) 20,032 (D) (D) Delaware 1/ ............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Florida ................: 28.20 33.00 29.20 47,827 66,769 40,620 Georgia ................: 23.90 21.80 (D) 41,228 39,194 (D) Maryland 2/ ............: 23.00 (NA) (NA) 713 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 22.80 21.30 27.40 13,498 27,532 23,890 New Jersey .............: 23.90 26.20 (D) 16,443 11,811 (D) New York 2/ ............: 56.90 (NA) (NA) 17,298 (NA) (NA) North Carolina .........: 18.00 (D) 22.00 12,528 (D) 9,794 : Ohio 1/ ................: (NA) (D) 32.10 (NA) (D) 6,625 South Carolina .........: 21.80 23.80 (D) 2,769 8,102 (D) Texas ..................: 18.50 22.30 25.00 2,146 3,325 3,400 Virginia 2/ ............: 40.00 (NA) (NA) 1,280 (NA) (NA) Wisconsin 1/ ...........: (NA) 51.00 (D) (NA) 770 (D) : Other States 3/ ........: (X) 25.60 31.90 - 39,016 72,347 : United States ..........: 26.10 25.90 29.50 175,762 196,519 156,676 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per ton ----- ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : Processing : Alabama ................: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) California .............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Delaware ...............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Florida ................: 435.00 546.00 495.00 64,397 51,398 96,981 Georgia ................: (D) 423.00 (D) (D) 2,730 (D) Michigan ...............: 220.00 200.00 235.00 37,642 41,614 55,849 New Jersey .............: (D) 400.00 (D) (D) 1,834 (D) North Carolina .........: (D) (D) 310.00 (D) (D) 18,905 Ohio ...................: 260.00 (D) 235.00 7,020 (D) 8,699 South Carolina .........: (D) 406.00 (D) (D) 1,210 (D) Texas ..................: 320.00 340.00 350.00 6,976 10,139 9,520 Wisconsin ..............: 290.00 220.00 (D) 9,538 7,396 (D) : Other States 4/ ........: 355.00 334.00 378.00 47,142 47,105 64,117 : United States ..........: 324.00 314.00 349.00 172,715 163,426 254,071 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Estimates began in 2016. 2/ Estimates discontinued in 2016. 3/ Includes data withheld above. 4/ In 2015, includes data withheld above and/or data for States not listed in this table. In 2016 and 2017, includes data withheld above. Garlic for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : California .............: 24,300 30,100 33,000 24,100 30,100 33,000 Nevada 1/ ..............: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) Oregon 1/ ..............: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) : Other States 2/ ........: 1,100 - - 1,100 - - : United States ..........: 25,400 30,100 33,000 25,200 30,100 33,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total Production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------------ cwt ----------- -------- 1,000 cwt -------- : California .............: 165.0 150.0 155.0 (NA) 4,515.0 5,115.0 Nevada 1/ ..............: (D) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) Oregon 1/ ..............: (D) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) : Other States 2/ ........: 102.0 (X) (X) (X) - - : United States ..........: 162.0 150.0 155.0 (NA) 4,515.0 5,115.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : California .............: (NA) - - 3,977.0 4,515.0 5,115.0 Nevada 1/ ..............: (NA) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) Oregon 1/ ..............: (NA) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) : Other States 2/ ........: (X) - - 112.0 - - : United States ..........: (NA) - - 4,089.0 4,515.0 5,115.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ---------- dollars --------- ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : California .............: 76.70 74.00 76.30 305,166 333,905 390,021 Nevada 1/ ..............: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) Oregon 1/ ..............: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) : Other States 2/ ........: 141.00 (X) (X) 15,840 - - : United States ..........: 78.50 74.00 76.30 321,006 333,905 390,021 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Estimates discontinued in 2016. 2/ Includes data withheld above. Garlic Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh market : California .............: (NA) 1,485.4 1,754.4 : United States ..........: (NA) 1,485.4 1,754.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : California .............: (NA) 151,478 168,028 : United States ..........: (NA) 151,478 168,028 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per cwt ----- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : Fresh market : California .............: (NA) 184.00 184.00 (NA) 273,314 322,810 : United States ..........: (NA) 184.00 184.00 (NA) 273,314 322,810 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per ton ----- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : Processing : California .............: (NA) 400.00 400.00 (NA) 60,591 67,211 : United States ..........: (NA) 400.00 400.00 (NA) 60,591 67,211 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (NA) Not available. Honeydew for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : Fresh market : Arizona ................: 2,300 (NA) (NA) 2,300 (NA) (NA) California .............: 11,500 (NA) (NA) 11,500 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 700 (NA) (NA) 600 (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: 14,500 (NA) (NA) 14,400 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : All : California .............: (NA) 12,100 11,600 (NA) 12,100 11,600 : United States ..........: (NA) 12,100 11,600 (NA) 12,100 11,600 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : cwt : Fresh market : Arizona ................: 245.0 (NA) (NA) California .............: 270.0 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 166.0 (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: 262.0 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----------- cwt ---------- -------- 1,000 cwt -------- : All : California .............: (NA) 325.0 290.0 (NA) 3,932.5 3,364.0 : United States ..........: (NA) 325.0 290.0 (NA) 3,932.5 3,364.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : All : California .............: (NA) - - (NA) 3,932.5 3,364.0 : United States ..........: (NA) - - (NA) 3,932.5 3,364.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : --------- dollars -------- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : All : California .............: (NA) 19.10 28.00 (NA) 75,111 94,192 : United States ..........: (NA) 19.10 28.00 (NA) 75,111 94,192 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. Honeydew Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh market : Arizona 1/ .............: 564.0 (NA) (NA) California .............: 3,105.0 3,932.5 3,364.0 Texas 1/ ...............: 100.0 (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: 3,769.0 3,932.5 3,364.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : California .............: (NA) - - : United States ..........: (NA) - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per cwt ----- ------- 1,000 dollars ------ : Fresh market : Arizona 1/ .............: 24.10 (NA) (NA) 13,592 (NA) (NA) California .............: 22.20 19.10 28.00 68,931 75,111 94,192 Texas 1/ ...............: 28.20 (NA) (NA) 2,820 (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: 22.60 19.10 28.00 85,343 75,111 94,192 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ---- dollars per ton ---- ----- 1,000 dollars ---- : Processing : California .............: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - : United States ..........: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Estimates discontinued in 2016. Head Lettuce for Fresh Market Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Area planted : Area harvested State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : acres : Arizona ........: 32,600 37,000 39,500 32,500 36,800 39,200 California .....: 87,000 85,000 84,000 86,500 84,500 83,500 : United States ..: 119,600 122,000 123,500 119,000 121,300 122,700 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Yield per acre : Total production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ----------- cwt ----------- --------- 1,000 cwt -------- : Arizona ........: 315.0 345.0 315.0 (NA) 12,696.0 12,348.0 California .....: 380.0 390.0 365.0 (NA) 32,955.0 30,477.5 : United States ..: 362.0 376.3 349.0 (NA) 45,651.0 42,825.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Harvested not sold : Utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 cwt : Arizona ........: (NA) - - 10,238.0 12,696.0 12,348.0 California .....: (NA) - - 32,870.0 32,955.0 30,477.5 : United States ..: (NA) - - 43,108.0 45,651.0 42,825.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : --------- dollars --------- -------- 1,000 dollars -------- : Arizona ........: 24.80 38.50 45.90 253,902 488,796 566,773 California .....: 30.40 23.00 32.60 999,248 757,965 993,567 : United States ..: 29.10 27.30 36.40 1,253,150 1,246,761 1,560,340 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. Leaf Lettuce for Fresh Market Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Area planted : Area harvested State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : acres : Arizona ........: 9,400 9,700 9,700 9,300 9,600 9,600 California .....: 47,000 49,800 45,000 45,800 49,700 44,500 : United States ..: 56,400 59,500 54,700 55,100 59,300 54,100 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Yield per acre : Total production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ----------- cwt ----------- --------- 1,000 cwt -------- : Arizona ........: 250.0 245.0 220.0 (NA) 2,352.0 2,112.0 California .....: 260.0 220.0 200.0 (NA) 10,934.0 8,900.0 : United States ..: 258.0 224.0 203.5 (NA) 13,286.0 11,012.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Harvested not sold : Utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 cwt : Arizona ........: (NA) - - 2,325.0 2,352.0 2,112.0 California .....: (NA) - - 11,908.0 10,934.0 8,900.0 : United States ..: (NA) - - 14,233.0 13,286.0 11,012.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : --------- dollars --------- ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : Arizona ........: 63.00 64.90 65.40 146,475 152,645 138,125 California .....: 59.10 42.80 60.10 703,763 467,975 534,890 : United States ..: 59.70 46.70 61.10 850,238 620,620 673,015 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. Romaine Lettuce for Fresh Market Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Area planted : Area harvested State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : acres : Arizona ........: 23,600 26,400 28,200 23,500 26,200 28,000 California .....: 64,000 67,900 72,100 63,500 67,000 71,700 : United States ..: 87,600 94,300 100,300 87,000 93,200 99,700 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Yield per acre : Total production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : ----------- cwt ----------- --------- 1,000 cwt -------- : Arizona ........: 310.0 330.0 330.0 (NA) 8,646.0 9,240.0 California .....: 300.0 320.0 300.0 (NA) 21,440.0 21,510.0 : United States ..: 303.0 322.8 308.4 (NA) 30,086.0 30,750.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Harvested not sold : Utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 cwt : Arizona ........: (NA) - - 7,285.0 8,646.0 9,240.0 California .....: (NA) - - 19,050.0 21,440.0 21,510.0 : United States ..: (NA) - - 26,335.0 30,086.0 30,750.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : --------- dollars --------- -------- 1,000 dollars -------- : Arizona ........: 45.60 32.30 55.50 332,196 279,266 512,820 California .....: 37.50 29.80 41.20 714,375 638,912 886,212 : United States ..: 39.70 30.50 45.50 1,046,571 918,178 1,399,032 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. Onions for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value by Season - States and United States: 2015 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area : Area : Yield : Utilized : Price : Value of : planted : harvested : per : production : per cwt : utilized : : : acre : : : production Season and State :------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2015 : 2015 : 2015 : 2015 : 2015 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------- acres ------ cwt 1,000 cwt dollars 1,000 dollars : Spring 1/ : California .............: 6,900 6,700 450.0 3,015.0 17.70 53,366 Georgia ................: 12,300 11,200 240.0 2,688.0 45.30 121,766 Texas ..................: 10,000 4,000 200.0 800.0 24.60 19,680 : United States ..........: 29,200 21,900 297.0 6,503.0 30.00 194,812 : Summer non-storage 1/ : California .............: 7,700 7,500 500.0 3,750.0 7.00 26,250 Nevada .................: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) New Mexico .............: 5,700 5,600 680.0 3,808.0 28.00 106,624 Texas ..................: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Washington 2/ ..........: 2,000 2,000 380.0 760.0 45.80 34,808 : Other States 3/ ........: 4,300 3,900 357.0 1,393.0 33.40 46,590 : United States ..........: 19,700 19,000 511.0 9,711.0 22.10 214,272 : Summer storage : California 4/ ..........: 31,200 30,000 400.0 12,000.0 14.70 176,400 Colorado ...............: 4,000 3,400 480.0 1,632.0 20.30 30,815 Idaho ..................: 8,000 8,000 720.0 5,760.0 10.10 49,803 Michigan ...............: 2,500 2,400 330.0 792.0 14.10 10,053 New York ...............: 7,800 7,500 345.0 2,588.0 17.60 40,533 Ohio ...................: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Oregon .................: 19,000 18,500 705.0 13,037.0 11.50 125,273 Malheur county .......: 9,400 9,200 760.0 6,992.0 10.10 61,438 All other counties ...: 9,600 9,300 650.0 6,045.0 13.20 63,835 Utah ...................: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Washington .............: 20,000 19,900 690.0 13,731.0 13.90 177,698 Wisconsin ..............: 1,600 1,500 430.0 645.0 16.60 10,624 : Other States 3/ ........: 1,600 1,500 523.0 785.0 13.10 9,042 : United States ..........: 95,700 92,700 550.0 50,970.0 13.60 630,241 : Total summer ............ : 115,400 111,700 543.0 60,681.0 13.90 844,513 : Total (spring, and summer) : 144,600 133,600 503.0 67,184.0 15.50 1,039,325 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. 1/ Primarily fresh market. 2/ Includes Walla Walla and other non-storage onions. 3/ Includes data withheld above. 4/ Primarily dehydrated and other processing. Summer Storage Onion Shrinkage and Loss - States and United States: 2015 ---------------------------------------- State : 2015 ---------------------------------------- : 1,000 cwt : California 1/ ......: 250 Colorado ...........: 114 Idaho ..............: 829 Michigan ...........: 79 New York ...........: 285 Ohio ...............: (D) Oregon .............: 2,118 Malheur county ...: 909 All Other county .: 1,209 Utah ...............: (D) Washington .........: 947 Wisconsin ..........: 5 : Other States 2/ ....: 95 : United States ......: 4,722 ---------------------------------------- (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. 1/ Primarily dehydrated and other processing. 2/ Includes data withheld above. Onion Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, Value, and Shrinkage and Loss - States and United States: 2016-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area : Area : Yield : Total : planted : harvested : per acre : production State :------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 2016 : 2017 : 2016 : 2017 : 2016 : 2017 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : -------------------- acres ------------------- ------- cwt ------ ----- 1,000 cwt ----- : California ...........: 48,700 48,800 47,000 48,500 435.0 470.0 20,445.0 22,795.0 Colorado .............: 3,600 3,900 3,100 3,600 450.0 460.0 1,395.0 1,656.0 Georgia ..............: 12,400 11,600 11,400 10,700 260.0 360.0 2,964.0 3,852.0 Idaho ................: 9,400 8,100 9,200 8,000 860.0 725.0 7,912.0 5,800.0 New Mexico ...........: 6,200 7,300 6,100 7,100 580.0 680.0 3,538.0 4,828.0 New York .............: 7,200 7,600 7,000 7,500 310.0 440.0 2,170.0 3,300.0 Oregon ...............: 19,100 19,900 18,800 19,700 771.0 660.0 14,496.0 12,995.5 Malheur county .....: (D) 11,100 (D) 11,000 (D) 695.0 (D) 7,645.0 All other counties .: (D) 8,800 (D) 8,700 (D) 615.0 (D) 5,350.5 Texas ................: 10,000 12,000 8,200 9,000 295.0 260.0 2,419.0 2,340.0 Washington ...........: 25,000 24,000 24,900 23,900 725.0 665.0 18,052.5 15,893.5 : United States ........: 141,600 143,200 135,700 138,000 540.8 532.3 73,391.5 73,460.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Shrinkage : Utilized : Price : Value of utilized : and loss : production : per cwt : production State :------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 2016 : 2017 : 2016 : 2017 : 2016 : 2017 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------------------ 1,000 cwt ------------------ ----- dollars ---- --- 1,000 dollars -- : California ...........: - - 20,445.0 22,795.0 9.53 13.80 194,739 315,648 Colorado .............: - - 1,395.0 1,656.0 15.70 23.80 21,902 39,413 Georgia ..............: - 96.3 2,964.0 3,755.7 39.00 34.80 115,596 130,745 Idaho ................: 989.0 63.8 6,923.0 5,736.2 6.30 8.28 43,646 47,483 New Mexico ...........: - - 3,538.0 4,828.0 26.70 17.50 94,465 84,490 New York .............: - 452.1 2,170.0 2,847.9 21.50 19.30 46,655 55,089 Oregon ...............: 1,812.8 7.6 12,683.2 12,987.9 15.30 8.55 194,143 111,002 Malheur county .....: (D) 7.6 (D) 7,637.4 (D) 7.76 (D) 59,289 All other counties .: (D) - (D) 5,350.5 (D) 9.67 (D) 51,713 Texas ................: 123.4 - 2,295.6 2,340.0 25.00 24.70 57,312 57,845 Washington ...........: 2,166.3 969.5 15,886.2 14,924.0 11.70 8.68 185,795 129,521 : United States ........: 5,091.5 1,589.3 68,300.0 71,870.7 14.00 13.50 954,253 971,236 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. Onion Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt Fresh market : California .............: (NA) 10,222.5 16,594.8 Colorado ...............: (NA) 1,395.0 1,656.0 Georgia ................: (NA) 2,964.0 (D) Idaho ..................: (NA) 4,778.8 4,495.0 New Mexico .............: (NA) 3,538.0 4,828.0 New York ...............: (NA) 2,170.0 2,748.9 Oregon .................: (NA) 7,000.2 7,702.0 Malheur county .......: (NA) (D) (D) All other counties ...: (NA) (D) (D) Texas ..................: (NA) 2,283.5 (D) Washington .............: (NA) 11,138.4 (D) : Other States 1/ ........: (X) - 16,267.0 : United States ..........: (NA) 45,490.4 54,291.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons Processing : California .............: (NA) 511,125 310,012 Colorado ...............: (NA) - - Georgia ................: (NA) - (D) Idaho ..................: (NA) 107,208 62,060 New Mexico .............: (NA) - - New York ...............: (NA) - 4,950 Oregon .................: (NA) 284,150 264,293 Malheur county .......: (NA) (D) (D) All other counties ...: (NA) (D) (D) Texas ..................: (NA) 605 (D) Washington .............: (NA) 237,390 (D) : Other States 1/ ........: (X) - 237,636 : United States ..........: (NA) 1,140,478 878,951 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Onion Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017(continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per cwt ----- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ Fresh market : California .............: (NA) 10.00 14.50 (NA) 102,225 240,625 Colorado ...............: (NA) 15.70 23.80 (NA) 21,902 39,413 Georgia ................: (NA) 39.00 (D) (NA) 115,596 (D) Idaho ..................: (NA) 6.80 9.10 (NA) 32,496 40,905 New Mexico .............: (NA) 26.70 17.50 (NA) 94,465 84,490 New York ...............: (NA) 21.50 19.50 (NA) 46,655 53,604 Oregon .................: (NA) 21.30 8.69 (NA) 149,093 66,955 Malheur county .......: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) All other counties ...: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Texas ..................: (NA) 25.00 (D) (NA) 57,088 (D) Washington .............: (NA) 13.10 (D) (NA) 145,913 (D) : Other States 1/ ........: (X) (X) 17.60 (X) - 286,383 : United States ..........: (NA) 16.80 15.00 (NA) 765,433 812,375 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per ton ----- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ Processing : California .............: (NA) 181.00 242.00 (NA) 92,514 75,023 Colorado ...............: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Georgia ................: (NA) (X) (D) (NA) - (D) Idaho ..................: (NA) 104.00 106.00 (NA) 11,150 6,578 New Mexico .............: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - New York ...............: (NA) (X) 300.00 (NA) - 1,485 Oregon .................: (NA) 159.00 167.00 (NA) 45,050 44,047 Malheur county .......: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) All other counties ...: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Texas ..................: (NA) 370.00 (D) (NA) 224 (D) Washington .............: (NA) 168.00 (D) (NA) 39,882 (D) : Other States 1/ ........: (X) (X) 134.00 (X) - 31,728 : United States ..........: (NA) 166.00 181.00 (NA) 188,820 158,861 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Includes data withheld above. Green Peas for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : Processing : Minnesota ..............: 57,700 (NA) (NA) 48,500 (NA) (NA) Washington .............: 43,800 (NA) (NA) 42,600 (NA) (NA) Wisconsin ..............: 36,000 (NA) (NA) 34,300 (NA) (NA) : Other States 1/ ........: 43,700 (X) (X) 40,800 (X) (X) : United States ..........: 181,200 (NA) (NA) 166,200 (NA) (NA) : Canning ................: 68,300 (NA) (NA) 60,700 (NA) (NA) : Freezing ...............: 112,900 (NA) (NA) 105,500 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : All : Illinois ...............: (NA) 7,100 6,400 (NA) 6,600 5,600 Minnesota ..............: (NA) 52,300 49,300 (NA) 46,300 46,000 New York ...............: (NA) 6,300 7,700 (NA) 6,100 7,100 Oregon .................: (NA) 20,300 13,500 (NA) 18,400 12,600 Washington .............: (NA) 39,000 28,300 (NA) 37,100 25,900 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 28,700 23,800 (NA) 27,100 22,500 : United States ..........: (NA) 153,700 129,000 (NA) 141,600 119,700 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : Minnesota ..............: 2.32 (NA) (NA) Washington .............: 3.46 (NA) (NA) Wisconsin ..............: 2.37 (NA) (NA) : Other States 1/ ........: 1.73 (X) (X) : United States ..........: 2.47 (NA) (NA) : Canning ................: 2.78 (NA) (NA) : Freezing ...............: 2.30 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----------- cwt ---------- -------- 1,000 cwt -------- : All : Illinois ...............: (NA) 45.0 37.0 (NA) 297.0 207.2 Minnesota ..............: (NA) 41.0 42.0 (NA) 1,898.3 1,932.0 New York ...............: (NA) 35.0 41.0 (NA) 213.5 291.1 Oregon .................: (NA) 40.0 35.0 (NA) 736.0 441.0 Washington .............: (NA) 50.0 59.0 (NA) 1,855.0 1,528.1 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 47.0 43.0 (NA) 1,273.7 967.5 : United States ..........: (NA) 44.3 44.8 (NA) 6,273.5 5,366.9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Green Peas for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : All : Illinois ...............: (NA) - - (NA) 297.0 207.2 Minnesota ..............: (NA) - - (NA) 1,898.3 1,932.0 New York ...............: (NA) - - (NA) 213.5 291.1 Oregon .................: (NA) - - (NA) 736.0 441.0 Washington .............: (NA) - - (NA) 1,855.0 1,528.1 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) - - (NA) 1,273.7 967.5 : United States ..........: (NA) - - (NA) 6,273.5 5,366.9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : --------- dollars -------- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : All : Illinois ...............: (NA) 13.60 10.70 (NA) 4,047 2,223 Minnesota ..............: (NA) 12.50 12.80 (NA) 23,808 24,651 New York ...............: (NA) 12.30 18.50 (NA) 2,622 5,389 Oregon .................: (NA) 14.40 12.40 (NA) 10,581 5,477 Washington .............: (NA) 17.10 15.60 (NA) 31,707 23,889 Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 10.20 14.80 (NA) 13,007 14,363 : United States ..........: (NA) 13.70 14.20 (NA) 85,772 75,992 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Includes data withheld above and/or data for States not listed in this table. Green Pea Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh market : Illinois ...............: (NA) (D) (D) Minnesota ..............: (NA) 1.9 1.9 New York ...............: (NA) 15.4 16.0 Oregon .................: (NA) (D) (D) Washington .............: (NA) (D) (D) Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 2.5 12.6 : Other States 1/ ........: (X) 34.3 57.4 : United States ..........: (NA) 54.1 87.9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : Illinois ...............: (D) (D) (D) Minnesota ..............: 112,450 94,820 96,503 New York ...............: (D) 9,906 13,754 Oregon .................: (D) (D) (D) Washington .............: 147,210 (D) (D) Wisconsin ..............: 81,120 63,558 47,746 : Other States 2/ ........: 70,540 142,682 105,943 : United States ..........: 411,320 310,966 263,946 : Canning 3/ .............: 168,990 (NA) (NA) : Freezing 3/ ............: 242,330 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per cwt ----- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : Fresh market : Illinois ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Minnesota ..............: (NA) 104.00 73.10 (NA) 198 139 New York ...............: (NA) 21.70 115.00 (NA) 334 1,840 Oregon .................: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Washington .............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Wisconsin ..............: (NA) 169.00 329.00 (NA) 423 4,145 : Other States 1/ ........: (X) 160.00 72.00 (X) 5,494 4,133 : United States ..........: (NA) 119.00 117.00 (NA) 6,449 10,257 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Green Pea Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per ton ----- ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : Processing : Illinois ...............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Minnesota ..............: 402.00 249.00 254.00 45,156 23,610 24,512 New York ...............: (D) 231.00 258.00 (D) 2,288 3,549 Oregon .................: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Washington .............: 262.00 (D) (D) 38,580 (D) (D) Wisconsin ..............: 334.00 198.00 214.00 27,110 12,584 10,218 : Other States 2/ ........: 294.00 286.00 259.00 20,722 40,841 27,456 : United States ..........: 320.00 255.00 249.00 131,568 79,323 65,735 : Canning 3/ .............: 342.00 (NA) (NA) 57,790 (NA) (NA) : Freezing 3/ ............: 304.00 (NA) (NA) 73,778 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Includes data withheld above. 2/ In 2015, includes data withheld above and/or data for States not listed in this table. In 2016 and 2017, includes data withheld above. 3/ Estimates discontinued in 2016. Bell Peppers for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : California .............: 16,600 17,200 16,000 16,500 17,100 15,900 Florida ................: 12,400 13,500 13,500 12,200 12,900 13,100 Georgia ................: 3,900 3,300 3,000 3,600 3,200 2,900 Michigan ...............: 1,500 1,600 1,900 1,400 1,500 1,800 New Jersey .............: 2,600 2,400 3,200 2,500 2,300 3,100 New York 1/ ............: (NA) 1,000 900 (NA) 900 800 North Carolina .........: 2,300 2,400 2,400 2,200 2,300 2,300 Ohio ...................: 2,600 2,700 2,600 2,500 2,600 2,500 Pennsylvania 1/ ........: (NA) 1,000 950 (NA) 900 900 : United States ..........: 41,900 45,100 44,450 40,900 43,700 43,300 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----------- cwt ----------- --------- 1,000 cwt -------- : California .............: 455.0 415.0 420.0 (NA) 7,096.5 6,678.0 Florida ................: 360.0 295.0 335.0 (NA) 3,805.5 4,388.5 Georgia ................: 280.0 300.0 290.0 (NA) 960.0 841.0 Michigan ...............: 280.0 260.0 255.0 (NA) 390.0 459.0 New Jersey .............: 305.0 275.0 280.0 (NA) 632.5 868.0 New York 1/ ............: (NA) 290.0 115.0 (NA) 261.0 92.0 North Carolina .........: 235.0 250.0 270.0 (NA) 575.0 621.0 Ohio ...................: 230.0 250.0 225.0 (NA) 650.0 562.5 Pennsylvania 1/ ........: (NA) 165.0 230.0 (NA) 148.5 207.0 : United States ..........: 371.0 332.2 339.9 (NA) 14,519.0 14,717.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : California .............: (NA) - 173.6 7,508.0 7,096.5 6,504.4 Florida ................: (NA) - - 4,392.0 3,805.5 4,388.5 Georgia ................: (NA) - - 1,008.0 960.0 841.0 Michigan ...............: (NA) - - 392.0 390.0 459.0 New Jersey .............: (NA) - 0.9 763.0 632.5 867.1 New York 1/ ............: (NA) - 5.5 (NA) 261.0 86.5 North Carolina .........: (NA) - - 517.0 575.0 621.0 Ohio ...................: (NA) - - 575.0 650.0 562.5 Pennsylvania 1/ ........: (NA) - 14.5 (NA) 148.5 192.5 : United States ..........: (NA) - 194.5 15,155.0 14,519.0 14,522.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ---------- dollars --------- ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : California .............: 49.00 31.90 43.40 368,066 226,411 282,452 Florida ................: 50.20 33.10 47.00 220,478 125,962 206,260 Georgia ................: 48.10 34.10 44.20 48,485 32,736 37,172 Michigan ...............: 38.00 37.00 27.30 14,896 14,430 12,531 New Jersey .............: 45.00 31.60 41.40 34,335 19,967 35,903 New York 1/ ............: (NA) 29.50 53.40 (NA) 7,700 4,619 North Carolina .........: 42.00 33.00 45.00 21,714 18,975 27,914 Ohio ...................: 43.00 44.80 40.00 24,725 29,122 22,500 Pennsylvania 1/ ........: (NA) 47.60 63.20 (NA) 7,063 12,170 : United States ..........: 48.30 33.20 44.20 732,699 482,366 641,521 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Estimates began in 2016. Bell Pepper Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh market : California .............: (NA) 6,081.7 4,480.9 Florida ................: (NA) 3,805.5 4,388.5 Georgia ................: (NA) 960.0 841.0 Michigan ...............: (NA) (D) (D) New Jersey .............: (NA) 471.2 (D) New York 1/ ............: (NA) (D) 86.5 North Carolina .........: (NA) 575.0 (D) Ohio ...................: (NA) (D) (D) Pennsylvania 1/ ........: (NA) (D) (D) : Other States 2/ ........: (X) 1,426.4 2,551.1 : United States ..........: (NA) 13,319.8 12,348.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : California .............: (NA) 50,740 101,172 Florida ................: (NA) - - Georgia ................: (NA) - - Michigan ...............: (NA) (D) (D) New Jersey .............: (NA) 8,064 (D) New York 1/ ............: (NA) (D) - North Carolina .........: (NA) - (D) Ohio ...................: (NA) (D) (D) Pennsylvania 1/ ........: (NA) (D) (D) : Other States 2/ ........: (X) 1,160 7,549 : United States ..........: (NA) 59,964 108,721 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per cwt ----- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : Fresh market : California .............: (NA) 34.50 54.50 (NA) 209,819 244,209 Florida ................: (NA) 33.10 47.00 (NA) 125,962 206,260 Georgia ................: (NA) 34.10 44.20 (NA) 32,736 37,172 Michigan ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) New Jersey .............: (NA) 36.90 (D) (NA) 17,387 (D) New York 1/ ............: (NA) (D) 53.40 (NA) (D) 4,619 North Carolina .........: (NA) 33.00 (D) (NA) 18,975 (D) Ohio ...................: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Pennsylvania 1/ ........: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) : Other States 2/ ........: (X) 40.40 42.50 (X) 57,589 108,484 : United States ..........: (NA) 34.70 48.70 (NA) 462,468 600,744 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Bell Pepper Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per ton ----- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : Processing : California .............: (NA) 327.00 378.00 (NA) 16,592 38,243 Florida ................: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Georgia ................: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Michigan ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) New Jersey .............: (NA) 320.00 (D) (NA) 2,580 (D) New York 1/ ............: (NA) (D) (X) (NA) (D) - North Carolina .........: (NA) (X) (D) (NA) - (D) Ohio ...................: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Pennsylvania 1/ ........: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) : Other States 2/ ........: (X) 626.00 336.00 (X) 726 2,534 : United States ..........: (NA) 332.00 375.00 (NA) 19,898 40,777 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Estimates began in 2016. 2/ Includes data withheld above. Chile Peppers for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 [Chile peppers are defined as all peppers excluding bell peppers.] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : Arizona ................: 1,600 1,600 1,400 1,300 1,600 1,200 California .............: 6,500 6,800 7,100 6,400 6,700 7,000 New Mexico .............: 8,300 9,200 8,100 7,700 8,700 7,600 Texas ..................: 3,000 3,300 3,400 2,700 3,000 3,100 : United States ..........: 19,400 20,900 20,000 18,100 20,000 18,900 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----------- cwt ----------- -------- 1,000 cwt -------- : Arizona ................: 62.0 76.0 65.0 (NA) 121.6 78.0 California .............: 380.0 455.0 390.0 (NA) 3,048.5 2,730.0 New Mexico .............: 175.0 160.0 165.0 (NA) 1,392.0 1,254.0 Texas ..................: 72.0 50.0 55.0 (NA) 150.0 170.5 : United States ..........: 223.0 235.6 223.9 (NA) 4,712.1 4,232.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Arizona ................: (NA) - - 81.0 121.6 78.0 California .............: (NA) - - 2,424.0 3,048.5 2,730.0 New Mexico .............: (NA) - - 1,334.0 1,392.0 1,254.0 Texas ..................: (NA) 7.0 - 195.0 143.0 170.5 : United States ..........: (NA) 7.0 - 4,034.0 4,705.1 4,232.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : --------- dollars --------- ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : Arizona ................: 48.30 36.50 26.10 3,915 4,439 2,039 California .............: 31.50 32.50 31.50 76,403 99,208 85,859 New Mexico .............: 30.80 36.70 35.50 41,090 51,028 44,553 Texas ..................: 73.50 60.00 61.30 14,335 8,580 10,458 : United States ..........: 33.60 34.70 33.80 135,743 163,255 142,909 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. Chile Pepper Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 [Chile peppers are defined as all peppers excluding bell peppers.] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh market : Arizona ................: (NA) 8.0 (D) California .............: (NA) 1,938.8 409.5 New Mexico .............: (NA) 261.7 263.3 Texas ..................: (NA) 85.1 (D) : Other States 1/ ........: (X) - 66.3 : United States ..........: (NA) 2,293.6 739.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : Arizona ................: (NA) 5,679 (D) California .............: (NA) 55,483 116,025 New Mexico .............: (NA) 56,515 49,533 Texas ..................: (NA) 2,895 (D) : Other States 1/ ........: (X) - 9,109 : United States ..........: (NA) 120,572 174,667 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per cwt ----- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : Fresh market : Arizona ................: (NA) 22.50 (D) (NA) 180 (D) California .............: (NA) 34.20 44.20 (NA) 66,307 18,100 New Mexico .............: (NA) 39.50 30.00 (NA) 10,337 7,899 Texas ..................: (NA) 60.00 (D) (NA) 5,106 (D) : Other States 1/ ........: (X) (X) 55.00 (X) - 3,644 : United States ..........: (NA) 35.70 40.10 (NA) 81,930 29,643 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per ton ----- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : Processing : Arizona ................: (NA) 750.00 (D) (NA) 4,259 (D) California .............: (NA) 593.00 584.00 (NA) 32,901 67,759 New Mexico .............: (NA) 720.00 740.00 (NA) 40,691 36,654 Texas ..................: (NA) 1,200.00 (D) (NA) 3,474 (D) : Other States 1/ ........: (X) (X) 972.00 (X) - 8,853 : United States ..........: (NA) 674.00 648.00 (NA) 81,325 113,266 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Includes data withheld above. Pumpkins for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : California .............: 6,200 5,100 5,300 6,100 5,000 5,200 Illinois ...............: 15,000 18,100 17,900 14,700 17,400 17,400 Indiana 1/ .............: (NA) 7,100 6,100 (NA) 7,000 6,000 Michigan ...............: 5,400 5,400 5,300 5,000 5,100 4,900 Minnesota 1/ ...........: (NA) 1,600 930 (NA) 1,500 840 New Jersey 1/ ..........: (NA) 2,100 2,200 (NA) 2,000 2,100 New York ...............: 4,700 5,900 5,500 4,400 5,200 4,900 North Carolina 1/ ......: (NA) 3,800 3,500 (NA) 3,600 3,400 Ohio ...................: 6,400 6,700 6,700 5,500 6,200 6,200 Oregon 1/ ..............: (NA) 2,200 2,500 (NA) 2,100 2,500 : Pennsylvania ...........: 5,500 4,600 4,900 5,200 4,300 4,600 Tennessee 1/ ...........: (NA) 1,900 1,700 (NA) 1,800 1,600 Texas 1/ ...............: (NA) 4,400 4,600 (NA) 4,000 4,500 Virginia 1/ ............: (NA) 2,300 2,500 (NA) 2,200 2,400 Washington 1/ ..........: (NA) 2,300 2,300 (NA) 2,200 1,900 Wisconsin 1/ ...........: (NA) 2,100 1,300 (NA) 1,800 900 : United States ..........: 43,200 75,600 73,230 40,900 71,400 69,340 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----------- cwt ----------- --------- 1,000 cwt -------- : California .............: 240.0 270.0 330.0 (NA) 1,350.0 1,716.0 Illinois ...............: 215.0 390.0 370.0 (NA) 6,786.0 6,438.0 Indiana 1/ .............: (NA) 135.0 160.0 (NA) 945.0 960.0 Michigan ...............: 155.0 155.0 155.0 (NA) 790.5 759.5 Minnesota 1/ ...........: (NA) 110.0 70.0 (NA) 165.0 58.8 New Jersey 1/ ..........: (NA) 100.0 95.0 (NA) 200.0 199.5 New York ...............: 110.0 115.0 105.0 (NA) 598.0 514.5 North Carolina 1/ ......: (NA) 260.0 210.0 (NA) 936.0 714.0 Ohio ...................: 155.0 150.0 170.0 (NA) 930.0 1,054.0 Oregon 1/ ..............: (NA) 230.0 180.0 (NA) 483.0 450.0 : Pennsylvania ...........: 155.0 170.0 165.0 (NA) 731.0 759.0 Tennessee 1/ ...........: (NA) 150.0 89.0 (NA) 270.0 142.4 Texas 1/ ...............: (NA) 410.0 195.0 (NA) 1,640.0 877.5 Virginia 1/ ............: (NA) 170.0 225.0 (NA) 374.0 540.0 Washington 1/ ..........: (NA) 180.0 180.0 (NA) 396.0 342.0 Wisconsin 1/ ...........: (NA) 110.0 150.0 (NA) 198.0 135.0 : United States ..........: 184.0 235.2 225.8 (NA) 16,792.5 15,660.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pumpkins for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : California .............: (NA) - 1.7 1,464.0 1,350.0 1,714.3 Illinois ...............: (NA) - 135.2 3,179.0 6,786.0 6,302.8 Indiana 1/ .............: (NA) - 1.0 (NA) 945.0 959.0 Michigan ...............: (NA) - 1.5 770.0 790.5 758.0 Minnesota 1/ ...........: (NA) 9.9 8.2 (NA) 155.1 50.6 New Jersey 1/ ..........: (NA) - 1.4 (NA) 200.0 198.1 New York ...............: (NA) - 15.4 489.0 598.0 499.1 North Carolina 1/ ......: (NA) - 7.9 (NA) 936.0 706.1 Ohio ...................: (NA) - 14.8 842.0 930.0 1,039.2 Oregon 1/ ..............: (NA) 24.1 22.5 (NA) 458.9 427.5 : Pennsylvania ...........: (NA) - 19.0 794.0 731.0 740.0 Tennessee 1/ ...........: (NA) - 14.8 (NA) 270.0 127.6 Texas 1/ ...............: (NA) - 13.2 (NA) 1,640.0 864.3 Virginia 1/ ............: (NA) - 1.1 (NA) 374.0 538.9 Washington 1/ ..........: (NA) 19.8 15.7 (NA) 376.2 326.3 Wisconsin 1/ ...........: (NA) 11.9 7.6 (NA) 186.1 127.4 : United States ..........: (NA) 65.7 281.0 7,538.0 16,726.8 15,379.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ---------- dollars --------- ------- 1,000 dollars ------ : California .............: 17.80 18.50 14.30 26,059 24,975 24,514 Illinois ...............: 3.79 6.31 3.87 12,054 42,824 24,421 Indiana 1/ .............: (NA) 14.40 19.20 (NA) 13,608 18,457 Michigan ...............: 15.70 15.10 11.00 12,080 11,909 8,314 Minnesota 1/ ...........: (NA) 19.10 26.50 (NA) 2,962 1,341 New Jersey 1/ ..........: (NA) 26.70 30.80 (NA) 5,340 6,101 New York ...............: 22.60 19.40 19.50 11,046 11,601 9,732 North Carolina 1/ ......: (NA) 24.70 18.60 (NA) 23,164 13,143 Ohio ...................: 17.10 17.80 13.60 14,372 16,583 14,113 Oregon 1/ ..............: (NA) 11.20 15.20 (NA) 5,146 6,514 : Pennsylvania ...........: 18.40 20.30 17.60 14,603 14,840 13,003 Tennessee 1/ ...........: (NA) 22.10 19.10 (NA) 5,967 2,437 Texas 1/ ...............: (NA) 10.40 26.80 (NA) 17,056 23,163 Virginia 1/ ............: (NA) 30.10 14.40 (NA) 11,257 7,760 Washington 1/ ..........: (NA) 27.30 28.20 (NA) 10,270 9,209 Wisconsin 1/ ...........: (NA) 18.90 27.80 (NA) 3,517 3,542 : United States ..........: 12.00 13.20 12.10 90,214 221,019 185,764 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. 1/ Estimates began in 2016. Pumpkin Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh market : California .............: (NA) 1,350.0 1,714.3 Illinois ...............: (NA) (D) (D) Indiana 1/ .............: (NA) 945.0 (D) Michigan ...............: (NA) (D) (D) Minnesota 1/ ...........: (NA) 155.1 50.6 New Jersey 1/ ..........: (NA) 200.0 198.1 New York ...............: (NA) 598.0 499.1 North Carolina 1/ ......: (NA) (D) (D) Ohio ...................: (NA) (D) (D) Oregon 1/ ..............: (NA) (D) (D) : Pennsylvania ...........: (NA) 714.2 (D) Tennessee 1/ ...........: (NA) 270.0 127.6 Texas 1/ ...............: (NA) 1,640.0 864.3 Virginia 1/ ............: (NA) 374.0 538.9 Washington 1/ ..........: (NA) (D) (D) Wisconsin 1/ ...........: (NA) 186.1 127.4 : Other States 2/ ........: (X) 4,798.8 5,358.8 : United States ..........: (NA) 11,231.2 9,479.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : California .............: (NA) - - Illinois ...............: (NA) (D) (D) Indiana 1/ .............: (NA) - (D) Michigan ...............: (NA) (D) (D) Minnesota 1/ ...........: (NA) - - New Jersey 1/ ..........: (NA) - - New York ...............: (NA) - - North Carolina 1/ ......: (NA) (D) (D) Ohio ...................: (NA) (D) (D) Oregon 1/ ..............: (NA) (D) (D) : Pennsylvania ...........: (NA) 841 (D) Tennessee 1/ ...........: (NA) - - Texas 1/ ...............: (NA) - - Virginia 1/ ............: (NA) - - Washington 1/ ..........: (NA) (D) (D) Wisconsin 1/ ...........: (NA) - - : Other States 2/ ........: (X) 273,938 295,004 : United States ..........: (NA) 274,779 295,004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pumpkin Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per cwt ----- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : Fresh market : California .............: (NA) 18.50 14.30 (NA) 24,975 24,514 Illinois ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Indiana 1/ .............: (NA) 14.40 (D) (NA) 13,608 (D) Michigan ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Minnesota 1/ ...........: (NA) 19.10 26.50 (NA) 2,962 1,341 New Jersey 1/ ..........: (NA) 26.70 30.80 (NA) 5,340 6,101 New York ...............: (NA) 19.40 19.50 (NA) 11,601 9,732 North Carolina 1/ ......: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Ohio ...................: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Oregon 1/ ..............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) : Pennsylvania ...........: (NA) 20.70 (D) (NA) 14,784 (D) Tennessee 1/ ...........: (NA) 22.10 19.10 (NA) 5,967 2,437 Texas 1/ ...............: (NA) 10.40 26.80 (NA) 17,056 23,163 Virginia 1/ ............: (NA) 30.10 14.40 (NA) 11,257 7,760 Washington 1/ ..........: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Wisconsin 1/ ...........: (NA) 18.90 27.80 (NA) 3,517 3,542 : Other States 2/ ........: (X) 20.40 17.50 (X) 98,122 93,542 : United States ..........: (NA) 18.60 18.20 (NA) 209,189 172,132 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per ton ----- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : Processing : California .............: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Illinois ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Indiana 1/ .............: (NA) (X) (D) (NA) - (D) Michigan ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Minnesota 1/ ...........: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - New Jersey 1/ ..........: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - New York ...............: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - North Carolina 1/ ......: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Ohio ...................: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Oregon 1/ ..............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) : Pennsylvania ...........: (NA) 66.90 (D) (NA) 56 (D) Tennessee 1/ ...........: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Texas 1/ ...............: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Virginia 1/ ............: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Washington 1/ ..........: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Wisconsin 1/ ...........: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - : Other States 2/ ........: (X) 43.00 46.20 (X) 11,774 13,632 : United States ..........: (NA) 43.10 46.20 (NA) 11,830 13,632 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Estimates began in 2016. 2/ Includes data withheld above. Spinach for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : Fresh market : Arizona ................: 10,500 (NA) (NA) 10,300 (NA) (NA) California .............: 27,000 (NA) (NA) 26,700 (NA) (NA) Colorado ...............: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) Maryland ...............: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) New Jersey .............: 1,500 (NA) (NA) 1,400 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 2,200 (NA) (NA) 2,100 (NA) (NA) : Other States 1/ ........: 690 (X) (X) 690 (X) (X) : United States ..........: 41,890 (NA) (NA) 41,190 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : Processing : United States ..........: 7,300 (NA) (NA) 7,200 (NA) (NA) : Canning ................: 1,200 (NA) (NA) 1,200 (NA) (NA) : Freezing ...............: 6,100 (NA) (NA) 6,000 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : All : Arizona ................: (NA) 11,200 12,800 (NA) 11,200 12,800 California .............: (NA) 35,800 33,500 (NA) 34,800 32,700 Colorado ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Maryland ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) New Jersey .............: (NA) 2,500 2,300 (NA) 2,400 2,200 Texas ..................: (NA) 4,200 4,300 (NA) 4,000 4,100 : Other States 1/ ........: (X) 1,300 1,250 (X) 1,300 1,230 : United States ..........: (NA) 55,000 54,150 (NA) 53,700 53,030 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : cwt : Fresh market : Arizona ................: 125.0 (NA) (NA) California .............: 160.0 (NA) (NA) Colorado ...............: (D) (NA) (NA) Maryland ...............: (D) (NA) (NA) New Jersey .............: 150.0 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 125.0 (NA) (NA) : Other States 1/ ........: 62.0 (X) (X) : United States ..........: 148.0 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : United States ..........: 10.44 (NA) (NA) : Canning ................: 20.00 (NA) (NA) : Freezing ...............: 8.53 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Spinach for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----------- cwt ---------- -------- 1,000 cwt -------- : All : Arizona ................: (NA) 180.0 175.0 (NA) 2,016.0 2,240.0 California .............: (NA) 130.0 110.0 (NA) 4,524.0 3,597.0 Colorado ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Maryland ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) New Jersey .............: (NA) 165.0 150.0 (NA) 396.0 330.0 Texas ..................: (NA) 245.0 240.0 (NA) 980.0 984.0 : Other States 1/ ........: (X) 91.0 138.0 (X) 118.5 169.6 : United States ..........: (NA) 149.6 138.0 (NA) 8,034.5 7,320.6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : All : Arizona ................: (NA) - - (NA) 2,016.0 2,240.0 California .............: (NA) - - (NA) 4,524.0 3,597.0 Colorado ...............: (NA) - - (NA) (D) (D) Maryland ...............: (NA) - - (NA) (D) (D) New Jersey .............: (NA) - - (NA) 396.0 330.0 Texas ..................: (NA) - - (NA) 980.0 984.0 : Other States 1/ ........: (X) - - (X) 118.5 169.6 : United States ..........: (NA) - - (NA) 8,034.5 7,320.6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : --------- dollars --------- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : All : Arizona ................: (NA) 46.20 53.30 (NA) 93,139 119,392 California .............: (NA) 50.70 67.20 (NA) 229,306 241,589 Colorado ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Maryland ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) New Jersey .............: (NA) 35.60 28.70 (NA) 14,111 9,473 Texas ..................: (NA) 10.50 28.80 (NA) 10,245 28,363 : Other States 1/ ........: (X) 32.70 12.40 (X) 3,872 2,104 : United States ..........: (NA) 43.60 54.80 (NA) 350,673 400,921 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Includes data withheld above. Spinach Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh market : Arizona ................: 1,288.0 2,016.0 2,240.0 California .............: 4,272.0 (D) (D) Colorado ...............: (D) (D) (D) Maryland ...............: (D) (D) (D) New Jersey .............: 210.0 254.2 (D) Texas ..................: 263.0 276.4 679.0 : Other States 1/ ........: 43.0 3,947.2 3,107.3 : United States ..........: 6,076.0 6,493.8 6,026.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : Arizona ................: (D) - - California .............: (D) (D) (D) Colorado ...............: (D) (D) (D) Maryland ...............: (D) (D) (D) New Jersey .............: (D) 7,088 (D) Texas ..................: (D) 35,182 15,252 : Other States 2/ ........: 75,200 34,762 49,465 : United States ..........: 75,200 77,032 64,717 : Canning 3/ .............: 24,000 (NA) (NA) : Freezing 3/ ............: 51,200 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per cwt ----- ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : Fresh market : Arizona ................: 42.90 46.20 53.30 55,255 93,139 119,392 California .............: 63.40 (D) (D) 270,845 (D) (D) Colorado ...............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Maryland ...............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) New Jersey .............: 49.30 47.90 (D) 10,353 12,176 (D) Texas ..................: 21.00 26.50 39.30 5,523 7,325 26,685 : Other States 1/ ........: 37.20 57.20 78.10 1,599 225,887 242,629 : United States ..........: 56.50 52.10 64.50 343,575 338,527 388,706 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Spinach Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per ton ----- ------- 1,000 dollars ------ : Processing : Arizona ................: (D) (X) (X) (D) - - California .............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Colorado ...............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Maryland ...............: (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) New Jersey .............: (D) 273.00 (D) (D) 1,935 (D) Texas ..................: (D) 83.00 110.00 (D) 2,920 1,678 : Other States 2/ ........: 138.00 210.00 213.00 10,394 7,291 10,537 : United States ..........: 138.00 158.00 189.00 10,394 12,146 12,215 : Canning 3/ .............: 83.00 (NA) (NA) 1,992 (NA) (NA) : Freezing 3/ ............: 164.00 (NA) (NA) 8,402 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Includes data withheld above. 2/ In 2015, includes data withheld above and/or data for States not listed in this table. In 2016 and 2017, includes data withheld above. 3/ Estimates discontinued in 2016. Squash for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : California .............: 5,600 5,100 5,000 5,400 5,000 4,900 Florida ................: 6,000 6,000 5,900 5,900 5,800 5,700 Georgia ................: 3,400 3,700 3,500 3,000 3,600 3,500 Michigan ...............: 5,800 6,300 5,800 5,600 6,100 5,700 New Jersey .............: 3,000 3,500 3,100 2,800 3,400 2,900 New York ...............: 4,500 4,300 4,200 4,200 4,100 4,100 North Carolina .........: 3,000 3,200 2,400 2,400 3,100 2,300 Ohio 1/ ................: 2,000 (NA) (NA) 1,800 (NA) (NA) Oregon .................: 3,600 3,000 3,700 3,500 2,900 3,600 South Carolina 1/ ......: 1,600 (NA) (NA) 1,500 (NA) (NA) Tennessee 1/ ...........: 650 (NA) (NA) 590 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 2,100 2,000 1,900 2,000 1,900 1,700 : United States ..........: 41,250 37,100 35,500 38,690 35,900 34,400 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------------ cwt ----------- -------- 1,000 cwt -------- : California .............: 160.0 200.0 170.0 (NA) 1,000.0 833.0 Florida ................: 100.0 115.0 130.0 (NA) 667.0 741.0 Georgia ................: 140.0 160.0 155.0 (NA) 576.0 542.5 Michigan ...............: 200.0 240.0 230.0 (NA) 1,464.0 1,311.0 New Jersey .............: 90.0 115.0 110.0 (NA) 391.0 319.0 New York ...............: 140.0 170.0 150.0 (NA) 697.0 615.0 North Carolina .........: 98.0 66.0 97.0 (NA) 204.6 223.1 Ohio 1/ ................: 180.0 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) Oregon .................: 350.0 290.0 300.0 (NA) 841.0 1,080.0 South Carolina 1/ ......: 110.0 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) Tennessee 1/ ...........: 64.0 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 90.0 90.0 90.0 (NA) 171.0 153.0 : United States ..........: 155.0 167.5 169.1 (NA) 6,011.6 5,817.6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : California .............: (NA) - 13.3 864.0 1,000.0 819.7 Florida ................: (NA) - 3.7 600.0 667.0 737.3 Georgia ................: (NA) - 5.4 420.0 576.0 537.1 Michigan ...............: (NA) - - 1,114.0 1,464.0 1,311.0 New Jersey .............: (NA) - 0.3 252.0 391.0 318.7 New York ...............: (NA) - 5.5 594.0 697.0 609.5 North Carolina .........: (NA) - 0.4 235.0 204.6 222.7 Ohio 1/ ................: (NA) (NA) (NA) 324.0 (NA) (NA) Oregon .................: (NA) - - 1,230.0 841.0 1,080.0 South Carolina 1/ ......: (NA) (NA) (NA) 165.0 (NA) (NA) Tennessee 1/ ...........: (NA) (NA) (NA) 38.0 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: (NA) - - 180.0 171.0 153.0 : United States ..........: (NA) - 28.6 6,016.0 6,011.6 5,789.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Squash for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ---------- dollars --------- ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : California .............: 34.50 28.10 34.90 29,826 28,074 28,648 Florida ................: 45.80 45.10 40.30 27,480 30,082 29,713 Georgia ................: 40.30 38.00 43.80 16,926 21,888 23,525 Michigan ...............: 17.50 15.00 20.20 19,543 22,020 26,543 New Jersey .............: 37.80 32.70 45.00 9,526 12,803 14,339 New York ...............: 42.00 29.30 38.30 24,950 20,455 23,338 North Carolina .........: 28.30 30.00 45.40 6,660 6,138 10,112 Ohio 1/ ................: 40.00 (NA) (NA) 12,960 (NA) (NA) Oregon .................: 8.00 8.60 11.60 9,840 7,234 12,505 South Carolina 1/ ......: 25.90 (NA) (NA) 4,274 (NA) (NA) Tennessee 1/ ...........: 53.00 (NA) (NA) 2,014 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 57.00 41.20 63.70 10,260 7,042 9,746 : United States ..........: 29.00 25.90 30.80 174,259 155,736 178,469 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. 1/ Estimates discontinued in 2016. Squash Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh market : California .............: (NA) 916.0 (D) Florida ................: (NA) 667.0 737.3 Georgia ................: (NA) 576.0 537.1 Michigan ...............: (NA) (D) 805.0 New Jersey .............: (NA) (D) (D) New York ...............: (NA) 445.4 (D) North Carolina .........: (NA) 204.6 (D) Oregon .................: (NA) (D) 156.6 Texas ..................: (NA) (D) 153.0 : Other States 1/ ........: (X) 1,199.0 1,876.5 : United States ..........: (NA) 4,008.0 4,265.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : California .............: (NA) 4,200 (D) Florida ................: (NA) - - Georgia ................: (NA) - - Michigan ...............: (NA) (D) 25,302 New Jersey .............: (NA) (D) (D) New York ...............: (NA) 12,581 (D) North Carolina .........: (NA) - (D) Oregon .................: (NA) (D) 46,170 Texas ..................: (NA) (D) - : Other States 1/ ........: (X) 83,400 4,696 : United States ..........: (NA) 100,181 76,168 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per cwt ----- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : Fresh market : California .............: (NA) 29.80 (D) (NA) 27,297 (D) Florida ................: (NA) 45.10 40.30 (NA) 30,082 29,713 Georgia ................: (NA) 38.00 43.80 (NA) 21,888 23,525 Michigan ...............: (NA) (D) 28.10 (NA) (D) 22,621 New Jersey .............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) New York ...............: (NA) 31.80 (D) (NA) 14,164 (D) North Carolina .........: (NA) 30.00 (D) (NA) 6,138 (D) Oregon .................: (NA) (D) 43.00 (NA) (D) 6,734 Texas ..................: (NA) (D) 63.70 (NA) (D) 9,746 : Other States 1/ ........: (X) 30.10 39.90 (X) 36,074 74,834 : United States ..........: (NA) 33.80 39.20 (NA) 135,643 167,173 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Squash Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per ton ----- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : Processing : California .............: (NA) 185.00 (D) (NA) 777 (D) Florida ................: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Georgia ................: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Michigan ...............: (NA) (D) 155.00 (NA) (D) 3,922 New Jersey .............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) New York ...............: (NA) 500.00 (D) (NA) 6,291 (D) North Carolina .........: (NA) (X) (D) (NA) - (D) Oregon .................: (NA) (D) 125.00 (NA) (D) 5,771 Texas ..................: (NA) (D) (X) (NA) (D) - : Other States 1/ ........: (X) 156.00 341.00 (X) 13,025 1,603 : United States ..........: (NA) 201.00 148.00 (NA) 20,093 11,296 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Includes data withheld above. Strawberries for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : California .............: 40,500 38,500 39,000 40,500 38,200 38,200 Florida ................: 11,000 10,800 10,800 10,900 10,700 10,700 Michigan 1/ ............: 800 (NA) (NA) 650 (NA) (NA) New York ...............: 960 900 800 800 760 700 North Carolina .........: 1,200 1,300 1,200 1,100 1,200 1,100 Ohio 1/ ................: 600 (NA) (NA) 540 (NA) (NA) Oregon .................: 1,500 1,500 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,200 Pennsylvania 1/ ........: 650 (NA) (NA) 600 (NA) (NA) Washington .............: 950 900 900 910 800 800 Wisconsin 1/ ...........: 790 (NA) (NA) 610 (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: 58,950 53,900 54,100 58,010 53,060 52,700 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------------ cwt ----------- --------- 1,000 cwt -------- : California .............: 685.0 760.0 765.0 (NA) 29,032.0 29,223.0 Florida ................: 225.0 205.0 225.0 (NA) 2,193.5 2,407.5 Michigan 1/ ............: 43.0 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) New York ...............: 36.0 40.0 39.0 (NA) 30.4 27.3 North Carolina .........: 130.0 120.0 135.0 (NA) 144.0 148.5 Ohio 1/ ................: 43.0 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) Oregon .................: 111.0 97.0 91.0 (NA) 135.8 109.2 Pennsylvania 1/ ........: 57.0 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) Washington .............: 77.0 94.0 95.0 (NA) 75.2 76.0 Wisconsin 1/ ...........: 55.0 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: 528.0 595.8 607.0 (NA) 31,610.9 31,991.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : California .............: (NA) 58.1 29.2 27,697.0 28,973.9 29,193.8 Florida ................: (NA) - - 2,442.0 2,193.5 2,407.5 Michigan 1/ ............: (NA) (NA) (NA) 28.0 (NA) (NA) New York ...............: (NA) - 0.8 29.0 30.4 26.5 North Carolina .........: (NA) - 7.0 143.0 144.0 141.5 Ohio 1/ ................: (NA) (NA) (NA) 23.0 (NA) (NA) Oregon .................: (NA) - - 155.0 135.8 109.2 Pennsylvania 1/ ........: (NA) (NA) (NA) 34.0 (NA) (NA) Washington .............: (NA) 0.8 0.8 70.0 74.4 75.2 Wisconsin 1/ ...........: (NA) (NA) (NA) 34.0 (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: (NA) 58.9 37.8 30,655.0 31,552.0 31,953.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ---------- dollars --------- -------- 1,000 dollars -------- : California .............: 67.70 106.00 106.00 1,875,483 3,084,784 3,100,215 Florida ................: 119.00 166.00 140.00 290,598 364,121 336,894 Michigan 1/ ............: 156.00 (NA) (NA) 4,375 (NA) (NA) New York ...............: 254.00 235.00 229.00 7,366 7,144 6,063 North Carolina .........: 164.00 187.00 166.00 23,452 26,928 23,440 Ohio 1/ ................: 170.00 (NA) (NA) 3,910 (NA) (NA) Oregon .................: 86.00 86.80 110.00 13,255 11,785 12,028 Pennsylvania 1/ ........: 213.00 (NA) (NA) 7,242 (NA) (NA) Washington .............: 112.00 116.00 107.00 7,840 8,653 8,009 Wisconsin 1/ ...........: 170.00 (NA) (NA) 5,780 (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: 73.00 111.00 109.00 2,239,301 3,503,415 3,486,649 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. 1/ Estimates discontinued in 2016. Strawberry Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh market : California .............: 21,600.0 22,761.1 23,787.5 Florida ................: 2,442.0 2,193.5 (D) Michigan 1/ ............: (D) (NA) (NA) New York ...............: 29.0 30.4 (D) North Carolina .........: 143.0 144.0 138.6 Ohio 1/ ................: 23.0 (NA) (NA) Oregon .................: 20.0 20.4 17.9 Pennsylvania 1/ ........: 34.0 (NA) (NA) Washington .............: (D) 18.0 (D) Wisconsin 1/ ...........: 34.0 (NA) (NA) : Other States 2/ ........: 47.0 - 2,455.7 : United States ..........: 24,372.0 25,167.4 26,399.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Processing : California .............: 6,097.0 6,212.8 5,406.3 Florida ................: - - (D) Michigan 1/ ............: (D) (NA) (NA) New York ...............: - - (D) North Carolina .........: - - 3.0 Ohio 1/ ................: - (NA) (NA) Oregon .................: 135.0 115.4 91.3 Pennsylvania 1/ ........: - (NA) (NA) Washington .............: (D) 56.4 (D) Wisconsin 1/ ...........: - (NA) (NA) : Other States 2/ ........: 51.0 - 53.5 : United States ..........: 6,283.0 6,384.6 5,554.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Strawberry Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price Per cwt : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per cwt ----- -------- 1,000 dollars -------- : Fresh market : California .............: 73.90 123.00 123.00 1,596,240 2,799,615 2,925,863 Florida ................: 119.00 166.00 (D) 290,598 364,121 (D) Michigan 1/ ............: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) New York ...............: 254.00 235.00 (D) 7,366 7,144 (D) North Carolina .........: 164.00 187.00 168.00 23,452 26,928 23,285 Ohio 1/ ................: 170.00 (NA) (NA) 3,910 (NA) (NA) Oregon .................: 170.00 108.00 195.00 3,400 2,203 3,491 Pennsylvania 1/ ........: 213.00 (NA) (NA) 7,242 (NA) (NA) Washington .............: (D) 205.00 (D) (D) 3,690 (D) Wisconsin 1/ ...........: 170.00 (NA) (NA) 5,780 (NA) (NA) : Other States 2/ ........: 173.00 (X) 141.00 8,133 - 347,259 : United States ..........: 79.90 127.00 125.00 1,946,121 3,203,701 3,299,898 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price Per cwt : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per cwt ----- ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : Processing : California .............: 45.80 45.90 32.20 279,243 285,169 174,352 Florida ................: (X) (X) (D) - - (D) Michigan 1/ ............: (D) (NA) (NA) (D) (NA) (NA) New York ...............: (X) (X) (D) - - (D) North Carolina .........: (X) (X) 51.70 - - 155 Ohio 1/ ................: (X) (NA) (NA) - (NA) (NA) Oregon .................: 73.00 83.00 93.50 9,855 9,582 8,537 Pennsylvania 1/ ........: (X) (NA) (NA) - (NA) (NA) Washington .............: (D) 88.00 (D) (D) 4,963 (D) Wisconsin 1/ ...........: (X) (NA) (NA) - (NA) (NA) : Other States 2/ ........: 80.00 (X) 69.30 4,082 - 3,707 : United States ..........: 46.70 46.90 33.60 293,180 299,714 186,751 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Estimates discontinued in 2016. 2/ Includes data withheld above. Tomatoes for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 [Cherry, grape, tomatillo, and greenhouse tomatoes are excluded] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : Fresh market : Alabama ................: 1,200 (NA) (NA) 1,100 (NA) (NA) Arkansas ...............: 900 (NA) (NA) 800 (NA) (NA) California .............: 28,600 (NA) (NA) 28,300 (NA) (NA) Florida ................: 33,000 (NA) (NA) 32,200 (NA) (NA) Georgia ................: 2,900 (NA) (NA) 2,700 (NA) (NA) Indiana ................: 800 (NA) (NA) 700 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 2,700 (NA) (NA) 2,600 (NA) (NA) New Jersey .............: 3,000 (NA) (NA) 2,900 (NA) (NA) New York ...............: 2,500 (NA) (NA) 2,300 (NA) (NA) North Carolina .........: 3,500 (NA) (NA) 3,300 (NA) (NA) : Ohio ...................: 3,700 (NA) (NA) 3,500 (NA) (NA) Pennsylvania ...........: 2,300 (NA) (NA) 2,200 (NA) (NA) South Carolina .........: 3,300 (NA) (NA) 3,200 (NA) (NA) Tennessee ..............: 3,500 (NA) (NA) 3,400 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 1,100 (NA) (NA) 900 (NA) (NA) Virginia ...............: 2,200 (NA) (NA) 2,100 (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: 95,200 (NA) (NA) 92,200 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : Processing : California .............: 299,000 (NA) (NA) 296,000 (NA) (NA) Indiana ................: 7,000 (NA) (NA) 6,700 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 3,300 (NA) (NA) 3,200 (NA) (NA) Ohio ...................: 5,000 (NA) (NA) 4,700 (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: 314,300 (NA) (NA) 310,600 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : All : California .............: (NA) 287,500 254,800 (NA) 285,300 246,400 Florida ................: (NA) 30,000 29,000 (NA) 28,000 28,000 Indiana ................: (NA) 8,100 7,800 (NA) 7,800 7,600 Michigan ...............: (NA) 6,000 5,700 (NA) 5,700 5,500 New Jersey .............: (NA) 3,900 4,100 (NA) 3,800 4,000 North Carolina .........: (NA) 3,200 3,000 (NA) 3,100 2,900 Ohio ...................: (NA) 9,000 8,800 (NA) 8,800 8,600 South Carolina .........: (NA) 3,100 2,700 (NA) 3,000 2,600 Tennessee ..............: (NA) 3,900 3,800 (NA) 3,600 3,600 Virginia ...............: (NA) 2,600 2,400 (NA) 2,400 2,300 : United States ..........: (NA) 357,300 322,100 (NA) 351,500 311,500 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Tomatoes for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) [Cherry, grape, tomatillo, and greenhouse tomatoes are excluded] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : cwt : Fresh market : Alabama ................: 350.0 (NA) (NA) Arkansas ...............: 190.0 (NA) (NA) California .............: 310.0 (NA) (NA) Florida ................: 295.0 (NA) (NA) Georgia ................: 340.0 (NA) (NA) Indiana ................: 72.0 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 300.0 (NA) (NA) New Jersey .............: 225.0 (NA) (NA) New York ...............: 130.0 (NA) (NA) North Carolina .........: 310.0 (NA) (NA) : Ohio ...................: 253.0 (NA) (NA) Pennsylvania ...........: 177.0 (NA) (NA) South Carolina .........: 270.0 (NA) (NA) Tennessee ..............: 295.0 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 90.0 (NA) (NA) Virginia ...............: 295.0 (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: 286.0 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : California .............: 48.52 (NA) (NA) Indiana ................: 28.60 (NA) (NA) Michigan ...............: 29.70 (NA) (NA) Ohio ...................: 22.70 (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: 47.50 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----------- cwt ---------- --------- 1,000 cwt -------- : All : California .............: (NA) 914.0 895.0 (NA) 260,764.2 220,528.0 Florida ................: (NA) 260.0 300.0 (NA) 7,280.0 8,400.0 Indiana ................: (NA) 650.0 590.0 (NA) 5,070.0 4,484.0 Michigan ...............: (NA) 555.0 560.0 (NA) 3,163.5 3,080.0 New Jersey .............: (NA) 260.0 280.0 (NA) 988.0 1,120.0 North Carolina .........: (NA) 310.0 330.0 (NA) 961.0 957.0 Ohio ...................: (NA) 505.0 490.0 (NA) 4,444.0 4,214.0 South Carolina .........: (NA) 280.0 370.0 (NA) 840.0 962.0 Tennessee ..............: (NA) 335.0 355.0 (NA) 1,206.0 1,278.0 Virginia ...............: (NA) 210.0 290.0 (NA) 504.0 667.0 : United States ..........: (NA) 811.4 788.7 (NA) 285,220.7 245,690.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Tomatoes for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) [Cherry, grape, tomatillo, and greenhouse tomatoes are excluded] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : All : California .............: (NA) - 4,631.1 (NA) 260,764.2 215,896.9 Florida ................: (NA) - 411.6 (NA) 7,280.0 7,988.4 Indiana ................: (NA) - - (NA) 5,070.0 4,484.0 Michigan ...............: (NA) - 12.3 (NA) 3,163.5 3,067.7 New Jersey .............: (NA) - 1.1 (NA) 988.0 1,118.9 North Carolina .........: (NA) - 51.7 (NA) 961.0 905.3 Ohio ...................: (NA) - - (NA) 4,444.0 4,214.0 South Carolina .........: (NA) - 1.9 (NA) 840.0 960.1 Tennessee ..............: (NA) - 12.8 (NA) 1,206.0 1,265.2 Virginia ...............: (NA) - 3.3 (NA) 504.0 663.7 : United States ..........: (NA) - 5,125.8 (NA) 285,220.7 240,564.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : --------- dollars -------- ------- 1,000 dollars ------ : All : California .............: (NA) 5.03 4.88 (NA) 1,310,483 1,054,001 Florida ................: (NA) 52.50 32.80 (NA) 382,200 262,020 Indiana ................: (NA) 5.95 6.63 (NA) 30,183 29,739 Michigan ...............: (NA) 10.70 11.70 (NA) 33,919 35,987 New Jersey .............: (NA) 52.30 35.00 (NA) 51,626 39,202 North Carolina .........: (NA) 54.20 46.20 (NA) 52,086 41,794 Ohio ...................: (NA) 16.60 18.00 (NA) 73,639 76,034 South Carolina .........: (NA) 35.00 33.30 (NA) 29,400 31,971 Tennessee ..............: (NA) 40.10 48.80 (NA) 48,310 61,719 Virginia ...............: (NA) 46.00 62.80 (NA) 23,184 41,707 : United States ..........: (NA) 7.13 6.96 (NA) 2,035,030 1,674,174 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. Tomato Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 [Cherry, grape, tomatillo, and greenhouse tomatoes are excluded] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh market : Alabama 1/ .............: 385.0 (NA) (NA) Arkansas 1/ ............: 152.0 (NA) (NA) California .............: 8,773.0 7,822.9 6,615.8 Florida ................: 9,499.0 7,280.0 7,988.4 Georgia 1/ .............: 918.0 (NA) (NA) Indiana ................: 50.0 25.4 31.4 Michigan ...............: 780.0 404.9 406.6 New Jersey .............: 653.0 (D) 689.9 New York 1/ ............: 299.0 (NA) (NA) North Carolina .........: 1,023.0 961.0 (D) : Ohio ...................: 886.0 1,004.3 1,015.6 Pennsylvania 1/ ........: 389.0 (NA) (NA) South Carolina .........: 864.0 840.0 960.1 Tennessee ..............: 1,003.0 (D) (D) Texas 1/ ...............: 81.0 (NA) (NA) Virginia ...............: 620.0 504.0 (D) : Other States 2/ ........: - 1,840.9 2,739.3 : United States ..........: 26,375.0 20,683.4 20,447.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : California .............: 14,361,000 12,647,064 10,464,054 Florida 3/ .............: (NA) - - Indiana ................: 191,620 252,233 222,631 Michigan ...............: 95,040 137,929 133,056 New Jersey 3/ ..........: (NA) (D) 21,448 North Carolina 3/ ......: (NA) - (D) Ohio ...................: 106,690 171,983 159,921 South Carolina 3/ ......: (NA) - - Tennessee 3/ ...........: (NA) (D) (D) Virginia 3/ ............: (NA) - (D) : Other States 2/ ........: - 17,656 4,744 : United States ..........: 14,754,350 13,226,865 11,005,854 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Tomato Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per cwt ----- -------- 1,000 dollars ------- : Fresh market : Alabama 1/ .............: 51.50 (NA) (NA) 19,828 (NA) (NA) Arkansas 1/ ............: 59.00 (NA) (NA) 8,968 (NA) (NA) California .............: 35.00 28.00 31.20 307,055 219,041 206,413 Florida ................: 47.70 52.50 32.80 453,102 382,200 262,020 Georgia 1/ .............: 39.40 (NA) (NA) 36,169 (NA) (NA) Indiana ................: 55.00 66.20 75.00 2,750 1,681 2,355 Michigan ...............: 53.60 46.30 54.80 41,808 18,747 22,282 New Jersey .............: 81.10 (D) 53.90 52,958 (D) 37,186 New York 1/ ............: 105.00 (NA) (NA) 31,395 (NA) (NA) North Carolina .........: 46.00 54.20 (D) 47,058 52,086 (D) : Ohio ...................: 54.40 55.00 56.60 48,198 55,237 57,483 Pennsylvania 1/ ........: 85.40 (NA) (NA) 33,221 (NA) (NA) South Carolina .........: 50.50 35.00 33.30 43,632 29,400 31,971 Tennessee ..............: 56.00 (D) (D) 56,168 (D) (D) Texas 1/ ...............: 60.00 (NA) (NA) 4,860 (NA) (NA) Virginia ...............: 55.00 46.00 (D) 34,100 23,184 (D) : Other States 2/ ........: (X) 52.70 52.10 - 97,099 142,819 : United States ..........: 46.30 42.50 37.30 1,221,270 878,675 762,529 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per ton ------ -------- 1,000 dollars ------- : Processing : California .............: 93.00 86.30 81.00 1,335,573 1,091,442 847,588 Florida 3/ .............: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Indiana ................: 120.00 113.00 123.00 22,994 28,502 27,384 Michigan ...............: 117.00 110.00 103.00 11,120 15,172 13,705 New Jersey 3/ ..........: (NA) (D) 94.00 (NA) (D) 2,016 North Carolina 3/ ......: (NA) (X) (D) (NA) - (D) Ohio ...................: 115.00 107.00 116.00 12,269 18,402 18,551 South Carolina 3/ ......: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Tennessee 3/ ...........: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) Virginia 3/ ............: (NA) (X) (D) (NA) - (D) : Other States 2/ ........: (X) 161.00 506.00 - 2,837 2,401 : United States ..........: 93.70 87.40 82.80 1,381,956 1,156,355 911,645 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Estimates discontinued in 2016. 2/ Includes data withheld above. 3/ Estimates began in 2016. Watermelons for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : Fresh market : Alabama ................: 3,300 (NA) (NA) 2,800 (NA) (NA) Arizona ................: 3,700 (NA) (NA) 3,600 (NA) (NA) Arkansas ...............: 1,600 (NA) (NA) 1,500 (NA) (NA) California .............: 11,700 (NA) (NA) 11,100 (NA) (NA) Delaware ...............: 2,400 (NA) (NA) 2,300 (NA) (NA) Florida ................: 21,500 (NA) (NA) 21,000 (NA) (NA) Georgia ................: 19,500 (NA) (NA) 19,000 (NA) (NA) Indiana ................: 7,300 (NA) (NA) 6,900 (NA) (NA) Maryland ...............: 3,300 (NA) (NA) 3,200 (NA) (NA) Mississippi ............: 2,000 (NA) (NA) 1,800 (NA) (NA) : Missouri ...............: 2,700 (NA) (NA) 2,600 (NA) (NA) North Carolina .........: 5,900 (NA) (NA) 5,800 (NA) (NA) Oklahoma ...............: 5,500 (NA) (NA) 4,000 (NA) (NA) South Carolina .........: 7,700 (NA) (NA) 7,200 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 29,000 (NA) (NA) 23,000 (NA) (NA) Virginia ...............: 700 (NA) (NA) 650 (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: 127,800 (NA) (NA) 116,450 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Area planted : Area harvested Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : acres : All : Arizona ................: (NA) 5,500 5,300 (NA) 5,500 3,700 California .............: (NA) 12,500 12,700 (NA) 11,900 12,500 Delaware ...............: (NA) 3,900 4,000 (NA) 3,700 3,900 Florida ................: (NA) 20,000 20,000 (NA) 19,500 19,500 Georgia ................: (NA) 20,000 21,000 (NA) 19,600 20,000 Indiana ................: (NA) 7,100 6,800 (NA) 7,000 6,700 Maryland ...............: (NA) 4,100 3,200 (NA) 4,000 3,000 Missouri ...............: (NA) 2,800 3,100 (NA) 2,700 3,000 North Carolina .........: (NA) 6,600 6,700 (NA) 6,300 6,500 South Carolina .........: (NA) 7,700 7,500 (NA) 7,200 7,100 Texas ..................: (NA) 28,000 25,000 (NA) 25,000 22,000 : United States ..........: (NA) 118,200 115,300 (NA) 112,400 107,900 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : cwt : Fresh market : Alabama ................: 150.0 (NA) (NA) Arizona ................: 440.0 (NA) (NA) Arkansas ...............: 225.0 (NA) (NA) California .............: 530.0 (NA) (NA) Delaware ...............: 331.0 (NA) (NA) Florida ................: 280.0 (NA) (NA) Georgia ................: 290.0 (NA) (NA) Indiana ................: 350.0 (NA) (NA) Maryland ...............: 325.0 (NA) (NA) Mississippi ............: 175.0 (NA) (NA) : Missouri ...............: 220.0 (NA) (NA) North Carolina .........: 310.0 (NA) (NA) Oklahoma ...............: 135.0 (NA) (NA) South Carolina .........: 380.0 (NA) (NA) Texas ..................: 240.0 (NA) (NA) Virginia ...............: 250.0 (NA) (NA) : United States ..........: 305.0 (NA) (NA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Watermelon for Fresh Market and Processing Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Yield per acre : Total production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----------- cwt ---------- --------- 1,000 cwt -------- : All : Arizona ................: (NA) 445.0 500.0 (NA) 2,447.5 1,850.0 California .............: (NA) 540.0 585.0 (NA) 6,426.0 7,312.5 Delaware ...............: (NA) 335.0 325.0 (NA) 1,239.5 1,267.5 Florida ................: (NA) 350.0 395.0 (NA) 6,825.0 7,702.5 Georgia ................: (NA) 310.0 350.0 (NA) 6,076.0 7,000.0 Indiana ................: (NA) 430.0 415.0 (NA) 3,010.0 2,780.5 Maryland ...............: (NA) 345.0 300.0 (NA) 1,380.0 900.0 Missouri ...............: (NA) 390.0 235.0 (NA) 1,053.0 705.0 North Carolina .........: (NA) 230.0 300.0 (NA) 1,449.0 1,950.0 South Carolina .........: (NA) 360.0 390.0 (NA) 2,592.0 2,769.0 Texas ..................: (NA) 290.0 290.0 (NA) 7,250.0 6,380.0 : United States ..........: (NA) 353.6 376.4 (NA) 39,748.0 40,617.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Harvested not sold : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : All : Arizona ................: (NA) - - (NA) 2,447.5 1,850.0 California .............: (NA) - 29.2 (NA) 6,426.0 7,283.3 Delaware ...............: (NA) - - (NA) 1,239.5 1,267.5 Florida ................: (NA) - - (NA) 6,825.0 7,702.5 Georgia ................: (NA) - 189.0 (NA) 6,076.0 6,811.0 Indiana ................: (NA) - - (NA) 3,010.0 2,780.5 Maryland ...............: (NA) - - (NA) 1,380.0 900.0 Missouri ...............: (NA) - 2.8 (NA) 1,053.0 702.2 North Carolina .........: (NA) - 25.3 (NA) 1,449.0 1,924.7 South Carolina .........: (NA) - 2.8 (NA) 2,592.0 2,766.2 Texas ..................: (NA) - 223.3 (NA) 7,250.0 6,156.7 : United States ..........: (NA) - 472.4 (NA) 39,748.0 40,144.6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per cwt : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : --------- dollars -------- ------ 1,000 dollars ------ : All : Arizona ................: (NA) 14.40 23.50 (NA) 35,244 43,475 California .............: (NA) 18.20 19.00 (NA) 116,953 138,383 Delaware ...............: (NA) 14.00 8.00 (NA) 17,353 10,140 Florida ................: (NA) 16.10 17.60 (NA) 109,883 135,564 Georgia ................: (NA) 11.70 10.90 (NA) 71,089 74,240 Indiana ................: (NA) 12.00 10.50 (NA) 36,120 29,195 Maryland ...............: (NA) 11.70 11.10 (NA) 16,146 9,990 Missouri ...............: (NA) 11.60 12.00 (NA) 12,192 8,445 North Carolina .........: (NA) 14.20 10.80 (NA) 20,576 20,787 South Carolina .........: (NA) 15.10 12.20 (NA) 39,139 33,748 Texas ..................: (NA) 10.20 14.90 (NA) 73,950 91,651 : United States ..........: (NA) 13.80 14.80 (NA) 548,645 595,618 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (NA) Not available. Watermelon Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 1,000 cwt : Fresh market : Alabama 1/ .............: 420.0 (NA) (NA) Arizona ................: 1,584.0 2,447.5 1,850.0 Arkansas 1/ ............: 338.0 (NA) (NA) California .............: 5,883.0 6,426.0 7,283.3 Delaware ...............: 761.0 1,239.5 1,267.5 Florida ................: 5,880.0 6,825.0 7,702.5 Georgia ................: 5,510.0 6,076.0 6,811.0 Indiana ................: 2,415.0 3,010.0 2,780.5 Maryland ...............: 1,040.0 1,380.0 900.0 Mississippi 1/ .........: 315.0 (NA) (NA) : Missouri ...............: 572.0 (D) (D) North Carolina .........: 1,798.0 (D) 1,924.7 Oklahoma 1/ ............: 540.0 (NA) (NA) South Carolina .........: 2,736.0 2,592.0 2,766.2 Texas ..................: 5,520.0 7,250.0 (D) Virginia 1/ ............: 163.0 (NA) (NA) : Other States 2/ ........: - 2,430.1 6,606.0 : United States ..........: 35,475.0 39,676.1 39,891.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : tons : Processing : Arizona ................: (NA) - - California .............: (NA) - - Delaware ...............: (NA) - - Florida ................: (NA) - - Georgia ................: (NA) - - Indiana ................: (NA) - - Maryland ...............: (NA) - - Missouri ...............: (NA) (D) (D) North Carolina .........: (NA) (D) - South Carolina .........: (NA) - - Texas ..................: (NA) - (D) : Other States 2/ ........: (X) 3,595 12,646 : United States ..........: (NA) 3,595 12,646 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Watermelon Production, Price, and Value by Utilization - States and United States: 2015-2017 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ------ dollars per cwt ----- ------- 1,000 dollars ------- : Fresh market : Alabama 1/ .............: 14.50 (NA) (NA) 6,090 (NA) (NA) Arizona ................: 16.80 14.40 23.50 26,611 35,244 43,475 Arkansas 1/ ............: 14.80 (NA) (NA) 5,002 (NA) (NA) California .............: 14.50 18.20 19.00 85,304 116,953 138,383 Delaware ...............: 13.00 14.00 8.00 9,893 17,353 10,140 Florida ................: 15.00 16.10 17.60 88,200 109,883 135,564 Georgia ................: 14.80 11.70 10.90 81,548 71,089 74,240 Indiana ................: 13.00 12.00 10.50 31,395 36,120 29,195 Maryland ...............: 13.00 11.70 11.10 13,520 16,146 9,990 Mississippi 1/ .........: 12.00 (NA) (NA) 3,780 (NA) (NA) : Missouri ...............: 8.70 (D) (D) 4,976 (D) (D) North Carolina .........: 18.00 (D) 10.80 32,364 (D) 20,787 Oklahoma 1/ ............: 13.50 (NA) (NA) 7,290 (NA) (NA) South Carolina .........: 13.50 15.10 12.20 36,936 39,139 33,748 Texas ..................: 9.40 10.20 (D) 51,888 73,950 (D) Virginia 1/ ............: 22.00 (NA) (NA) 3,586 (NA) (NA) : Other States 2/ ........: (X) 13.50 15.10 - 32,704 99,782 : United States ..........: 13.80 13.80 14.90 488,383 548,581 595,304 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Price per unit : Value of utilized production Utilization and State :----------------------------------------------------------------- : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 : 2015 : 2016 : 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : ----- dollars per ton ----- ----- 1,000 dollars ----- : Processing : Arizona ................: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - California .............: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Delaware ...............: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Florida ................: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Georgia ................: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Indiana ................: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Maryland ...............: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Missouri ...............: (NA) (D) (D) (NA) (D) (D) North Carolina .........: (NA) (D) (X) (NA) (D) - South Carolina .........: (NA) (X) (X) (NA) - - Texas ..................: (NA) (X) (D) (NA) - (D) : Other States 2/ ........: (X) 17.80 24.80 (X) 64 314 : United States ..........: (NA) 17.80 24.80 (NA) 64 314 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Represents zero. (D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (X) Not applicable. 1/ Estimates discontinued in 2016. 2/ Includes data withheld above. Vegetable Comments Artichokes: Total production in 2017 totaled 936,000 cwt, down 5 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 7,200 acres, up 6 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 7,200 acres, was up 6 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $65.5 million, 16 percent less than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 936,000 cwt, all of which was for the fresh market. In California, artichoke quality was generally good and acreage was up from the previous season. However, the excessively wet winter and spring kept artichoke supplies tight for the first half of the year. Asparagus: Total production in 2017 totaled 671,200 cwt, down 10 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 24,700 acres, down 4 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 23,300 acres, was down 2 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $73.1 million, 9 percent less than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 669,900 cwt, of which 519,500 cwt was for the fresh market and 7,518 tons for processing. In Michigan, the largest producing State, asparagus began emerging in late April in the West Central region. Cool temperatures in early May delayed harvest and a frost event in mid-May damaged the crop in some areas. Warmer temperatures returned by late May and harvest was in full swing by the end of the month. Cooler temperatures and adequate moisture during the early part of June aided growth and spear quality, although early season pests were a concern to some growers. Harvest was drawing to a close by the end of June. In Washington, harvest got off to a late start due to a cold spring. New varieties started to enter production and improve yields. In California, the 2017 harvest began by late February and lasted until early June. Excessively hot temperatures resulted in below average yields. Green Lima Beans: Total production in 2017 totaled 720,700 cwt, down 5 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 25,800 acres, down 1 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 25,400 acres, was up slightly from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $20.9 million, 1 percent less than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 720,700 cwt, of which 5,100 cwt was for the fresh market and 35,781 tons for processing. Growers in Delaware, the largest producing State, reported a good crop despite heat stress in May and June along with wet weather and some reports of disease. Growers reported the use of several different varieties. In Washington, the planting period ranged from late April to July. Lima beans, which have a very short growth window compared to other crops, likely benefitted from the excessive rainy season, while other crops were hindered by late plantings. Snap beans: Total production in 2017 totaled 18.0 million cwt, down 10 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 225,000 acres, down 10 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 214,600 acres, was down 9 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $338 million, 15 percent less than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 18.0 million cwt, of which 3.62 million cwt was for the fresh market and 718,330 tons for processing. In Wisconsin, the largest producing State, wet and cold conditions prevailed in the spring with some reports of flooded out fields. Early plantings did not do as well as those planted later in the season. In New York, a rainy season persisted and planting was delayed and the crop matured slowly. Harvest was hindered due to continued wet conditions. In Michigan, harvest began by the end of July with good quality reported. Broccoli: Total production in 2017 totaled 20.4 million cwt, down 9 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 130,500 acres, down 1 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 129,400 acres, was down 1 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $926 million, 9 percent more than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 20.4 million cwt, of which 19.9 million cwt was for the fresh market and 23,800 tons for processing. In California, wet conditions restricted field access and impaired spring harvesting and planting, leading to lower yields and high prices for the 2017 crop. In Arizona, the season began with optimal growing conditions however high temperatures in the latter part of the growing season led to an earlier than normal conclusion to harvest. Cabbage: Total production in 2017 totaled 23.5 million cwt, up 2 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 62,000 acres, up 3 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 59,600 acres, was up 3 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $429 million, 6 percent less than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 23.5 million cwt, of which 19.1 million cwt was for the fresh market and 219,908 tons for processing. In California, adverse weather conditions in the spring and excessive precipitation negatively affected yields. In Florida, growing conditions were favorable and damage from Hurricane Irma was minimal. New York growers reported wet conditions that delayed planting and slowed crop maturity. Cantaloupes: Total production in 2017 totaled 13.8 million cwt, down 8 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 58,000 acres, down 2 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 57,050 acres, was down 2 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $267 million, 4 percent more than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 13.8 million cwt., all of which was for the fresh market. In California, the largest producing State, extreme heat began in June. High temperatures curtailed some harvesting and slowed growth in August and September. Overall quality was reported as good with some sun scalding and softness as the main defects from the intense heat. In Arizona, the season began with good growing conditions in late September, but in October, drier, cooler weather prevailed. Quality was rated as excellent. High temperatures began to affect quality in May with shippers reporting soft melons and smaller sizes. By mid-June an extreme heat wave affected quality and decreased availability of cantaloupe, as temperatures were so high in some areas that crews were unable to harvest. Crop loss due to the heat and inability to harvest was reported. Carrots: Total production in 2017 totaled 30.3 million cwt, down 4 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 78,700 acres, up 1 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 74,400 acres, was down 3 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $691 million, 12 percent less than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 30.3 million cwt, of which 20.8 million cwt was for the fresh market and 475,195 tons for processing. In California, the largest producing State, ideal weather conditions during the growing season and ample water supplies resulted in plentiful carrot production and good quality. In Washington, a prolonged rainy season followed a later than normal planting window. Cauliflower: Total production in 2017 totaled 8.41 million cwt, up 17 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 43,100 acres, up 8 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 42,200 acres, was up 6 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $387 million, 3 percent less than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 8.39 million cwt, of which 8.06 million cwt was for the fresh market and 16,650 tons for processing. In California, the largest producing State, stormy weather and precipitation prevailed across the cauliflower producing areas early in the season causing supply shortages and quality issues. Additional shortages were reported as the crop was transitioning between growing areas. Better growing conditions were reported later in the season improving both supplies and quality. In Arizona, optimal growing conditions were reported at the beginning of the growing season then above average rainfall and temperatures caused some problems. Later in the season, above average temperatures led to dehydration and an earlier than normal end to the season. Celery: Total production in 2017 totaled 15.6 million cwt, down 10 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 25,400 acres, down 16 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 25,100 acres, was down 16 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $315 million, slightly less than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 15.6 million cwt, of which 15.1 million cwt was for the fresh market and 26,596 tons for processing. In California, growing conditions were mostly favorable across the major celery production areas with adequate moisture and above average temperatures. However, major storms and precipitation occurred early in the year in which resulted in some supply and quality issues. Sweet Corn: Total production in 2017 totaled 79.3 million cwt, up 5 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 503,000 acres, down 2 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 483,100 acres, was down 2 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $932 million, 4 percent more than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 78.9 million cwt, of which 24.6 million cwt was for the fresh market and 2.72 million tons for processing. In Minnesota, the largest producing State, the season started off slow with very wet conditions and some fields being flooded. Later in the season, drier conditions returned allowing for a good harvest. In Washington, the region was hot and dry for most of the growing season. Acreage with irrigation did well, while the acreage without irrigation showed signs of stress due to dry conditions. Cucumbers: Total production in 2017 totaled 19.9 million cwt, up 11 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 125,800 acres, up slightly from the previous year. Area harvested, at 123,600 acres, was up 3 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $411 million, 14 percent more than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 19.9 million cwt, of which 5.32 million cwt was for the fresh market and 728,382 tons for processing. In Michigan, the largest producing State, seeding began the third week of May and was completed by the end of June. Excessive rainfall in early July caused some damage and promoted Downey mildew development. Harvest began in late July and continued with subsequent plantings into September. In Florida, weather conditions were generally favorable. Hurricane Irma hit before most of the fields were planted. North Carolina growers reported a warm growing season, while still receiving an average amount of rainfall. Three counties reported Downey mildew. The cucumber crop in California benefitted from increased rainfall and warmer temperatures during the growing season. Garlic: Total production in 2017 totaled 5.12 million cwt, up 13 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 33,000 acres, up 10 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 33,000 acres, was up 10 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $390 million, 17 percent more than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 5.12 million cwt, of which 1.75 million cwt was for the fresh market and 168,028 tons for processing. Growers reported better weather in 2017 than in recent years. The harvest season ran from May through November. Some growers reported an increase in organic and heirloom garlic. Honeydew: Total production in 2017 totaled 3.36 million cwt, down 14 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 11,600 acres, down 4 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 11,600 acres, was down 4 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $94.2 million, 25 percent more than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 3.36 million cwt, all of which was for the fresh market. In California, unusually high summer temperatures caused some sun scalding and softness in the crop. Growers reported abundant water supplies from early season rains which were beneficial to the overall quality of the crop. Head Lettuce: Total production in 2017 totaled 42.8 million cwt, down 6 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 123,500 acres, up 1 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 122,700 acres, was up 1 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $1.56 billion, 25 percent more than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 42.8 million cwt, all of which was for the fresh market. In California, the largest producing State, weather was warmer than normal during the winter growing season. Heavy rains delayed harvest. In Arizona, a fall hail storm and high temperatures led to quality issues. Some growers reported burns, growth cracks, and insect damage. Leaf Lettuce: Total production in 2017 totaled 11.0 million cwt, down 17 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 54,700 acres, down 8 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 54,100 acres, was down 9 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $673 million, 8 percent more than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 11.0 million cwt, all of which was for the fresh market. In California, the largest producing State, heavy rains and flooding during the spring damaged a substantial portion of the crop, resulting in supply shortages and a significant increase in price. In Arizona, a hail storm in the fall led to mildew and additional quality issues such as brown spotting. Winds caused twisting and bolting. Common reported defects included blistering, peeling, discoloration, and tip burn. Romaine Lettuce: Total production in 2017 totaled 30.8 million cwt, up 2 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 100,300 acres, up 6 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 99,700 acres, was up 7 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $1.40 billion, 52 percent more than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 30.8 million cwt, all of which was for the fresh market. In California, the largest producing State, weather was warmer than normal during the winter growing season. Heavy rains delayed harvest. In Arizona, a fall hail storm and high temperatures led to quality issues. Some growers reported burns, growth cracks, and insect damage. Onions: Total production in 2017 totaled 73.5 million cwt, up fractionally from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 143,200 acres, up 1 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 138,000 acres, was up 2 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $971 million, 2 percent more than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 71.9 million cwt, of which 54.3 million cwt was for the fresh market and 878,951 tons for processing. In California, the largest producing State, winter rains resulted in adequate water supplies in the major onion growing areas. Onion sizes were reported to be good. In both Oregon and Washington, extended wet conditions caused by a prolonged rainy season delayed plantings by several weeks. Wet conditions persisted until early May. Green Peas: Total production in 2017 totaled 5.37 million cwt, down 14 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 129,000 acres, down 16 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 119,700 acres, was down 15 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $76.0 million, 11 percent less than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 5.37 million cwt, of which 87,900 cwt was for the fresh market and 263,946 tons for processing. In Minnesota and Wisconsin, yields were reported as average or slightly below average due to wet weather in late May and June. The wet conditions caused some fields to be bypassed or no second crop was able to be planted. In Washington, the season started out wet, making it difficult for producers to get into the fields to plant. This was followed by hot and dry conditions for the remainder of the growing season. Fields with irrigation did well, while those without irrigation showed signs of stress due to dry conditions. Bell Peppers: Total production in 2017 totaled 14.7 million cwt, up 1 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 44,450 acres, down 1 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 43,300 acres, was down 1 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $642 million, 33 percent more than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 14.5 million cwt, of which 12.3 million cwt was for the fresh market and 108,721 tons for processing. In Florida, abnormally dry conditions were persistent throughout the growing season. Growing conditions in Georgia were ideal for much of the season and damage from Hurricane Matthew was minimal. In Michigan, warm, humid weather during July promoted crop development but did increase disease reports. Cooler nights in mid-August reduced foliar disease pressure. California growers reported ideal growing conditions for most of the season. However, late season heat waves with higher than normal overnight lows affected quality and shelf life. Chile Peppers: Total production in 2017 totaled 4.23 million cwt, down 10 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 20,000 acres, down 4 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 18,900 acres, was down 6 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $143 million, 12 percent less than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 4.23 million cwt, of which 739,100 cwt was for the fresh market and 174,667 tons for processing. In California, weather conditions were reported to be ideal for much of the season. However, late season heat waves with higher than normal overnight lows negatively impacted quality, shelf life, and yields. In New Mexico, despite reports of dry conditions and high temperatures, the crop was not adversely affected. Pumpkins: Total production in 2017 totaled 15.7 million cwt, down 7 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 73,230 acres, down 3 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 69,340 acres, was down 3 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $186 million, 16 percent less than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 15.4 million cwt, of which 9.48 million cwt was for the fresh market and 295,004 tons for processing. In Illinois, cool, dry weather allowed the pumpkin harvest to start in late July. The main pumpkin producing regions averaged 6 days suitable for field work per week for the first 3 weeks of August. This helped to mitigate potential harm from a much warmer than average September and October. In Ohio, planting was underway from May into June. Several instances of powdery mildew were reported in July, several weeks later than normal. Mild temperatures, cloudy days, and rain in August led to some Downey mildew cases in September. Harvest was completed in October. Michigan began planting in May and finished in mid-July. Early season harvest began in September with full harvest underway in mid-October. The season got off to a slow start in Indiana, but warm temperatures during the second half of the season helped push crop development ahead of normal. In California, adequate irrigation supplies prevailed across the major pumpkin growing areas after several years of drought. Above average temperatures were recorded throughout the late summer and fall, but growers reported a good crop overall. Spinach: Total production in 2017 totaled 7.32 million cwt, down 9 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 54,150 acres, down 2 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 53,030 acres, was down 1 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $401 million, 14 percent more than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 7.32 million cwt, of which 6.03 million cwt was for the fresh market and 64,717 tons for processing. Arizona growers reported above average rainfall and higher than average temperatures in January, followed by higher temperatures in February and March that began to affect quality of the crop. Squash: Total production in 2017 totaled 5.82 million cwt, down 3 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 35,500 acres, down 4 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 34,400 acres, was down 4 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $178 million, 15 percent more than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 5.79 million cwt, of which 4.27 million cwt was for the fresh market and 76,168 tons for processing. In Michigan, the largest producing State, seeding of summer squash and zucchini into plastic mulched beds was underway by late April, while transplants were being set out under low tunnels by mid-May. Direct seeding continued into late-May. Harvest began in mid-June, although cool temperatures hindered progress. Fall and winter squash planting continued through early June, with winter squash setting fruit by early August. Harvest began in early September. Florida producers experienced an abnormally dry winter and spring causing them to run more irrigation than normal. Some growers reported whitefly pressure, but overall the crop fared well. In California, winter rains resulted in adequate water supplies in the major squash growing areas. Above average temperatures during the summer months and some disease pressure were reported by growers. New York producers reported a wet growing season. Rain continued into the harvest period causing delay and lost crop due to rot. A wet spring followed by a dry summer made it a challenging year for growers in Oregon. Strawberries: Total production in 2017 totaled 32.0 million cwt, up 1 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 54,100 acres, up less than 1 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 52,700 acres, was down 1 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $3.49 billion, down 1 percent from the previous season. Utilized production totaled 32.0 million cwt, of which 26.4 million cwt was for the fresh market and 5.55 million cwt for processing. In California, the largest producing State, there was an increase in summer plantings for fall production despite winter rains early in the season. An increase in higher producing varieties and generally better weather conditions for most of the season led to increased production compared with the previous season. In Florida, wet conditions early in the growing season presented some disease and insect issues. In Oregon, some growers reported heat stress, as well as weed and pest pressure which negatively impacted the crop. Tomatoes: Total production in 2017 totaled 246 million cwt, down 14 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 322,100 acres, down 10 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 311,500 acres, was down 11 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $1.67 billion, 18 percent less than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 241 million cwt, of which 20.4 million cwt was for the fresh market and 11.0 million tons for processing. In California, the largest producing State, the intense summer heat had a negative impact on the crop. Growers also reported mold in many areas. In Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio, growers reported frost damage around mid-May. By June, tomatoes were in various stages of growth with no reports of serious disease pressure. Fresh market tomato harvest began as early as late June for some growers and was well underway by mid-July. Harvest of processing tomatoes was underway by August. In Florida, the weather was warmer than average during most of the season. Much of the State was dry during the fall and early spring, however the crop received sufficient moisture. The warmer weather caused the crop to mature earlier than normal. Watermelons: Total production in 2017 totaled 40.6 million cwt, up 2 percent from the 2016 total. Planted area was estimated at 115,300 acres, down 2 percent from the previous year. Area harvested, at 107,900 acres, was down 4 percent from 2016. The value of the crop totaled $596 million, 9 percent more than the previous season. Utilized production totaled 40.1 million cwt, of which 39.9 million cwt was for the fresh market and 12,646 tons for processing. In Florida, the largest producing State, precipitation levels were below normal during planting but timely rains in the spring and summer aided the crop as it matured. Georgia growers reported higher than normal temperatures for the entire season. Excessive rainfall during harvest made field access difficult but led to higher yields. In Delaware, excessive rainfall and disease pressure adversely affected yields. Definitions of Terms Area harvested: For 2015, refers to the area harvested for the intended utilization (fresh, processing, or all if the crop is a dual use crop). For 2016 and 2017, refers to the total vegetable acreage harvested for all purposes (both fresh and processing utilization). Area planted: For 2015, refers to the area planted for the intended utilization (fresh, processing, or all if the crop is a dual use crop). For 2016 and 2017, refers to the total vegetable acreage planted for all purposes (both fresh and processing utilization). Harvested not sold: Beginning with the 2016 season, represents the difference between total production and utilized production. These are vegetables that were harvested from the field, but were not sold for various reasons including but not limited to poor quality, marketing restrictions, or other reasons. Hundredweight (cwt): For 2015, the standard unit used for fresh market yield, fresh market production, and fresh market price. For 2016 and 2017, the standard unit used for the all yield, all total production, harvested not sold, all utilized production, as well as the fresh market utilized production and fresh market price. One hundredweight is equal to 100 pounds. Ton: Standard unit for processed vegetables. One ton is equal to 2,000 pounds. Total Production: The quantity of a crop that was actually harvested and left the field. Utilization: These estimates refer to the first utilization, not necessarily the final utilization of a crop. For example, fresh market vegetables include some vegetables that may be later processed for sauce, soups, and preserves. Grade-outs for vegetables which are processed are included in the processing quantity. Utilized production: The amount of a crop sold for fresh market, sold for processing, the quantities used at home to make processed items, or held in storage. It is the difference between total production and harvested not sold. Yield per acre: For 2015, represents utilized production divided by harvested acres. For 2016 and 2017, represents total production divided by area harvested. Price and Value Definitions Price: Represents the Marketing Year Average (MYA) price. For a crop sold for both fresh market and processing, the (MYA) is a weighted average of the fresh and processing prices. Prices for fresh vegetables are the average prices producers receive at the point of first sale. This is commonly referred to as the average price as sold. Since the point of first sale is not the same for all producers, prices for the various methods of sale are weighted by the proportionate quantity sold. For example, if in a given State part of the vegetables are sold free on board (F.O.B.) packed by growers, part are sold as bulk vegetables at the packinghouse door, and some are sold retail at roadside stands, the fresh vegetable average price as sold is a weighted average of the average price for each method of sale. F.O.B. packed prices are adjusted to an equivalent incoming packinghouse door price by subtracting all costs that accumulate between the incoming packinghouse door and the F.O.B. price. These costs include grading, packing, inspecting fees, selling, and other costs. Prices for vegetables sold for processing are equivalent returns for vegetables delivered to the processing plant door. Value: Crop value estimates in this report cover the marketing season or crop year and should not be confused with cash receipts which are based on a calendar year. State MYA Price and Value Computations Fresh Market Value: Fresh Market MYA * Fresh Market Utilization Processed Value: Processed MYA * Processed Utilization "All" Value: Fresh Market Value + Processed Value "All" MYA: "All" Value "All" Utilization For commodities with components not identified by market channel, substitute breakdown name for fresh market/processed and use the same procedure. United States MYA Price and Value Computations Fresh Market MYA: ?(Fresh Market Value For All States) ?(Fresh Market Utilization For All States) Processed MYA: ?(Processed Value For All States) ?(Processed Utilization For All States) "All" MYA: ?(Value For All States) ?(Utilization For All States) Statistical Methodology Survey Procedures: Starting with the 2012 Crop year, acreage, production, marketing year price and value information included in this report is collected on an annual basis for fresh market and processing vegetables. A sample of vegetable growers are surveyed in major producing States in the program. The Vegetable Sampling Frame consists of farm operators with at least 0.1 acre on the list frame for specific vegetable commodities. The Multivariate Probability Proportional to Size (MPPS) sampling design is used to select the sample. The sample does not have an area component. Data are collected by mail out questionnaires and personal interviews. Telephone follow-up of mail survey non-respondents is used to ensure adequate coverage. Due to the variable nature of the vegetable industry, mail lists are updated to ensure complete coverage. Estimation Procedures: Information obtained from the vegetables grower surveys along with federal administrative data is used to establish estimates of total planted and harvested acres, yield, production, price, and value. These estimates are reviewed for errors, reasonableness, and consistency with historical estimates. Revision Policy: End-of-season vegetable estimates are subject to revision the following year based on a thorough review of all available data and are published in the Vegetables Annual Summary. Reliability: Survey indications are subject to sampling variability because all operations growing vegetables are not included in the sample. Survey results are also subject to non-sampling errors such as omission, duplication, imputation for missing data, and mistakes in reporting, recording, and processing the data. These errors cannot be measured directly, but are minimized through rigid quality controls in the data collection process and a careful review of all reported data for consistency and reasonableness. Information Contacts Listed below are the commodity statisticians in the Crops Branch of the National Agricultural Statistics Service to contact for additional information. E-mail inquiries may be sent to nass@nass.usda.gov Lance Honig, Chief, Crops Branch.................................................... (202) 720-2127 Jorge Garcia-Pratts, Head, Fruits, Vegetables and Special Crops Section............. (202) 720-2127 Vincent Davis - Apricots, Bananas, Cherries, Garlic, Lettuce, Mint, Papaya, Pears, Strawberries, Tomatoes....................................................... (202) 720-2157 Fleming Gibson - Avocados, Cauliflower, Celery, Citrus, Coffee, Dates, Figs, Kiwifruit, Nectarines, Olives, Green Peas, Taro, Watermelons.................. (202) 720-5412 Greg Lemmons - Blackberries, Blueberries, Boysenberries, Cranberries, Cucumbers, Potatoes, Pumpkins, Raspberries, Squash, Sugarbeets, Sugarcane, Sweet Potatoes........................................................... (202) 720-4285 Dan Norris - Artichokes, Austrian Winter Peas, Cantaloupes, Dry Beans, Dry Edible Peas, Honeydews, Lentils, Mushrooms, Peaches, Snap Beans ...... (202) 720-3250 Daphne Schauber - Bell Peppers, Broccoli, Cabbage, Chile Peppers, Floriculture, Grapes, Hops, Maple Syrup, Tree Nuts, Spinach......................... (202) 720-4215 Chris Singh - Apples, Asparagus, Carrots, Lima Beans, Onions, Plums, Prunes, Sweet Corn, Tobacco.................................................. (202) 720-4288 Access to NASS Reports For your convenience, you may access NASS reports and products the following ways: All reports are available electronically, at no cost, on the NASS web site: www.nass.usda.gov Both national and state specific reports are available via a free e- mail subscription. To set-up this free subscription, visit www.nass.usda.gov and click on "National" or "State" in upper right corner above "search" box to create an account and select the reports you would like to receive. For more information on NASS surveys and reports, call the NASS Agricultural Statistics Hotline at (800) 727-9540, 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET, or e-mail: nass@nass.usda.gov. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form (PDF), found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html, or at any USDA office, or call (866) 632-9992 to request the form. You may also write a letter containing all of the information requested in the form. Send your completed complaint form or letter to us by mail at U.S. Department of Agriculture, Director, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, by fax (202) 690-7442 or email at program.intake@usda.gov.