Ag Ch 1 (05) United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service Agricultural Chemical Usage 2004 Field Crops Summary May 2005 Table of Contents Page Narrative Table Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Highlights Durum Wheat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 7 Peanuts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 12 Soybeans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 23 Other Spring Wheat. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 39 Winter Wheat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 50 Agricultural Chemical Rate Per Crop Year - Highlights . . . . 67 Durum Wheat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 Peanuts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 Soybeans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Other Spring Wheat. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Winter Wheat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 Pest Management Practices - Highlights . . . . . . . . . 71 Durum Wheat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 Peanuts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 Soybeans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 Other Spring Wheat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 Winter Wheat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 Survey and Estimation Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 Reliability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 Terms and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 Trade Names, Common Names, and Classes . . . . . . . . . . 102 Survey Instrument (Fertilizer, Pesticide, and Pest Management Sections). . . 107 Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 Report Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Overview The agricultural chemical use estimates in this report refer to on-farm use of commercial fertilizers and pesticides on targeted crops for the 2004 crop year. Targeted crops included durum wheat, peanuts, soybeans, other spring wheat, and winter wheat. Farm and ranch operators were enumerated late in the growing season after the farm operator had indicated that planned applications were completed. The chemical use data were not summarized for geographical areas other than those States published in this report. The data were compiled from two surveys, the Agricultural Resources Management Survey (ARMS) and Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP). Data collection occurred primarily during the months of September to December of 2004. Relevant portions of the survey instruments used in data collection are included in the back of this publication. This report excludes pesticides used for seed treatments and postharvest applications to the commodity. Spot treatments, which account for a very small percentage of total applications, are mentioned only in the "Active Ingredients and Publication Status" tables. The table below shows the number of States surveyed, the number of summarized reports for each State, and the percent of the Program States' acres planted to that commodity compared with the U.S. total. The last time durum wheat, soybeans, other spring wheat, and winter wheat were surveyed was in 2002, and can be used as a comparison to this year's data. Agricultural Chemical Use Survey Coverage, 2004 & 2002 Crop 2004 2002 States Reports U.S. States Reports U.S. Surveyed Summarized Acreage Surveyed Summarized Acreage Included Included in Survey in Survey - - Number - - Percent - - Number - - Percent Durum Wheat 2 211 90 1 75 72 Peanuts 5 545 91 X X X Soybeans 11 3,163 81 20 2,526 97 Other Spring Wheat 7 953 99 3 353 81 Winter Wheat 14 2,087 85 10 1,006 75 Highlights Durum Wheat: Two program states, Montana and North Dakota, were surveyed for durum wheat in the 2004 ARMS phase II survey. Nitrogen was the most commonly used fertilizer for producers of durum wheat. Producers in Montana applied nitrogen to 96 percent of their fields; North Dakota applied it to 95 percent of their fields. At the Program State level, 36 pounds of nitrogen were applied per acre per application; 147.8 million total pounds of nitrogen were applied to the fields in 2004. Phosphate was applied to 84 percent of the acres treated in Montana, while only 70 percent of North Dakota durum wheat acres were treated. The rate per application in the Program States was 24 pounds of phosphate per acre, with a total of 46.9 million pounds applied. Potash had the lowest coverage and smallest rate per application of all fertilizers reported. Montana distributed potash on 10 percent of their planted acres, while North Dakota applied it on 6 percent. The rate per application of potash for the Program States was 9 pounds per acre, with 1.7 million total pounds applied to the fields. None of the growers reported any insecticides in this survey. Herbicides were applied to 99 percent of the durum wheat planted. Fenoxaprop was the most widely applied herbicide with 48 percent of the planted acreage being treated. It was applied at a rate of 0.05 pounds per acre per application; 67,000 total pounds were applied in the Program States. The next three most widely applied herbicides to durum wheat were glyphosate, MCPA, and 2,4-D. They were applied to 46, 45, and 36 percent, respectively, of the planted acreage. There were not enough reports available to publish any fungicide data. Peanuts: States surveyed in 2004 for peanut pesticide practices included Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and Texas. Phosphate, on average, was the most widely used fertilizer. Of planted fields, 66 percent of planted acres had phosphate applied. However, the use of different fertilizers was extremely state specific. Florida applied potash to 94 percent of its planted acres, phosphate to 80 percent and nitrogen to 71 percent, while North Carolina applied potash to 64 percent of its acres, phosphate to 35 percent of its treated acres, and nitrogen to 37 percent of its acreage. The rates per application for these fertilizers were also as variable, with Texas applying 41 pounds of nitrogen per acre, while Georgia only applied 15 pounds of nitrogen per acre. North Carolina applied 94 pounds of potash per acre, while Texas only applied 57 pounds per acre. The total amount of fertilizer applied for the Program States for nitrogen was 28.3 million pounds, 43.3 million pounds for phosphate, and 64.8 million pounds for potash. Herbicides were applied to 98 percent of the peanut planted acreage in the Program States. 3-Pyridinecarb acid was the most widely applied herbicide and was the second widest used active ingredient; 52 percent of the planted acreage was treated. It was applied at a rate of 0.01 pounds per acre, 7,000 pounds were applied over all the Program States. The herbicides 2,4-DB, dimethylamine salt and pendimethalin ranked fourth and fifth in the top five active ingredients used on peanuts by percent acres, at 45 and 40 percent respectively. Fungicides were applied to 93 percent of the peanut planted acreage. Chlorothalonil was the most widely applied fungicide, and most widely used active ingredient; 77 percent of the planted acreage were treated. It was applied at a rate of 0.92 pounds per acre, with a total of 3,542,000 pounds applied over all the Program States. The fungicide tebuconazole was the third most commonly used active ingredient with 47 percent of planted acres being treated. Insecticides were applied to 66 percent of the acres in the Program States, though a large amount of variability existed. North Carolina applied insecticides to 92 percent of its planted acres but Texas applied insecticides to only 3 percent of their acreage. Highlights (continued) Soybeans: Eleven states were included in the 2004 survey: Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, and South Dakota. Phosphate was the most commonly used fertilizer on soybeans; it was applied to 26 percent of acreage in the Program States. A total of 1,095.9 million pounds of phosphate were applied to the Program State acreage. North Dakota had the highest phosphate coverage of any other state, applying phosphate to 63 percent of their planted soybean acreage. South Dakota had the second highest coverage, applying phosphate to 45 percent of their fields. All other states applied phosphate to less than 40 percent of their planted acreage. Iowa only applied it to 11 percent of their planted acreage. Potash was the next most frequently applied fertilizer, with 23 percent of acres planted being treated; a total of 1,733.9 million pounds were applied. Again great variability existed, Ohio applied potash to 43 percent of its planted acreage, while Kansas only treated 5 percent. Nitrogen had the smallest acreage coverage at only 21 percent of Program State acres, with 358.1 million pounds distributed. Herbicides were applied to 97 percent of the Program State acreage though one active ingredient clearly dominated. Glyphosate was used on 87 percent of all the acres treated, 0.73 pounds of gyphosate were applied per acre per application, and 57.7 million total pounds of glyphosate were applied. The next four most widely used active ingredients were also herbicides, but their percent of acres treated were much smaller. Chlorimum-ethyl, sulfentrazone, trifluralin, and pendimethalin rounded out the top five active ingredients at 7, 6, 5, and 4 percent of acres treated, respectively. Insecticides were used on 4 percent of the Program State acres, but individual active ingredients only covered a maximum of 1 percent of soybean Program State acreage. Fungicides were applied to only 1 percent of the Program State acres; only the active ingredient azoxystrobin was reported. Other Spring Wheat: States surveyed for other spring wheat included Idaho, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, and Washington. Nitrogen fertilizer was applied to 93 percent of the 2004 spring wheat planted acreage in the Program States. Spring wheat growers in the Program States applied nitrogen on average 2.0 times per acre, putting down 48 pounds of nitrogen per acre per treatment. Fertilizers with phosphate were applied to 79 percent of the planted acreage and 25 percent of the planted acreage received potash applications. Spring wheat producers in the states surveyed treated 96 percent of their planted acreage with herbicides. MCPA was the most widely applied herbicide with 46 percent of the planted acreage being treated in the Program States. It was applied at a rate of 0.29 pounds per acre per application; a total of 1.845 million pounds of the active ingredient were applied in the Program States. The next four active ingredients that round off the top five used active ingredients were also herbicides. They were fenoxaprop, glyphosate, 2,4-D, and bromoxynil octanoate. Their percents of acres treated were 31, 23, 20, and 19 percent, respectively. Insecticides were applied to only 2 percent of the other spring wheat acres planted in the Program States. No active ingredient was applied on more than 1 percent of the acres planted. Fungicides were applied to 20 percent of acres planted in the Program States. The most commonly used fungicide was tebuconazole, which was only applied to 12 percent of the acres planted in the Program States. Highlights (continued) Winter Wheat: Producers in the Program States (Colorado, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, and Washington) applied nitrogen fertilizer to 84 percent of the winter wheat planted acreage. The average number of nitrogen applications per acre was 2.0 with an average application rate of 44 pounds per acre; 2,733 million total pounds were applied. Phosphate was applied on 55 percent of the winter wheat planted acreage in the Program States; 934 million total pounds were applied. Potash was applied to 16 percent of the planted winter wheat acreage in the Program States. Producers in Ohio applied potash to 90 percent of their winter wheat planted acreage; Washington and Nebraska producers applied potash to only 3 percent of the planted acreage. In the Program States, 45 percent of the winter wheat planted acreage was treated with herbicides. The most widely used herbicides were metsulfuron-methyl, applied to 15 percent of the winter wheat acreage, followed by glyphosate and 2,4-D, both applied to 13 percent of the planted acreage in the States surveyed. Insecticide applications were made to 7 percent of the winter wheat planted acres in 2004. Chlorpyrifos, the most widely used insecticide, was only applied to 3 percent of Program State acres planted. Fungicides were applied to 2 percent of Program State acreage. No active ingredients were applied to more than 1 percent of the total Program State acreage. Highlights (continued) Program States Surveyed for 2004 Field Crops Chemical Usage Survey Durum Peanuts Soybeans Other Winter Wheat Spring Wheat Wheat Alabama + Arkansas + Colorado + Florida + Georgia + Idaho + + Illinois + + Indiana + Iowa + Kansas + + Michigan + Minnesota + + Missouri + + Montana + + + Nebraska + + North Carolina + North Dakota + + + Ohio + + Oklahoma + Oregon + + South Dakota + + + Texas + + Washington + + Durum Wheat: Fertilizer Use by State, 2004 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied State : Planted :--------------------------------------------------------- : Acreage : Nitrogen : Phosphate : Potash ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent Mil. Percent Mil. Percent Mil. : Acres lbs lbs lbs : : MT : 570 96 32.5 84 11.8 10 0.6 ND : 1,750 95 115.3 70 35.1 6 1.1 : Total : 2,320 95 147.8 73 46.9 7 1.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Durum Wheat: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : Montana : 570 Nitrogen : 96 1.8 32 59 32.5 Phosphate : 84 1.2 21 25 11.8 Potash : 10 1.2 9 11 0.6 : North Dakota : 1,750 Nitrogen : 95 1.9 37 69 115.3 Phosphate : 70 1.2 25 29 35.1 Potash : 6 1.1 10 11 1.1 : Total : 2,320 Nitrogen : 95 1.9 36 67 147.8 Phosphate : 73 1.2 24 28 46.9 Potash : 7 1.1 9 11 1.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Durum Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : MT : ND -------------------------------------------------------- : Herbicides : 2,4-D : P P P 2,4-D, Dimeth. salt : P * * 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : P * * Acetic acid (2,4-D) : P * * Bromoxynil : P * * Bromoxynil octanoate : P * * Butoxy. ester 2,4-D : * * * Clodinafop-propargil : P P P Clopyralid : * * * Dicamba : P P P Dicamba, Sodium salt : * * * Fenoxaprop : P P P Flucarbazone-sodium : P P Fluroxypyr : P * * Fluroxypyr 1-methylh : P * * Glyphosate : P P P Glyphosate diam salt : * * MCPA : P P P MCPA, dimethyl. salt : * * * MCPA-EHE : * * Metsulfuron-methyl : * * Sulfosate : * * Thifensulfuron : P * * Triallate : * * * Triasulfuron : * * * Tribenuron-methyl : P P P Trifluralin : P P P : Fungicides : Propiconazole : * * -------------------------------------------------------- P Usage data are published for this active ingredient. * Usage data are not published for this active ingredient. Durum Wheat: Pesticide, Planted Acreage, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied Program States and Total, 2004 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Area Receiving and Total Applied State :Planted:---------------------------------------------------------------------- :Acreage: Herbicide : Insecticide : Fungicide : Other --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 : Acres lbs lbs lbs lbs : : MT : 570 99 508 ND 1/ : 1,750 99 1,216 : Total1/ : 2,320 99 1,724 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more pesticide classes. Durum Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 36 1.0 0.37 0.38 321 2,4-D, Dimeth. salt : 2 1.1 0.21 0.23 13 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 6 1.0 0.26 0.26 36 Acetic acid (2,4-D) : 5 1.0 0.25 0.25 31 Bromoxynil : 3 1.0 0.20 0.20 13 Bromoxynil octanoate : 18 1.3 0.23 0.29 118 Clodinafop-propargil : 16 1.0 0.05 0.05 19 Dicamba : 23 1.3 0.07 0.09 51 Fenoxaprop : 48 1.1 0.05 0.06 67 Flucarbazone-sodium : 4 1.0 0.01 0.01 1 Fluroxypyr : 9 1.0 0.08 0.08 15 Fluroxypyr 1-methylh : 5 1.0 0.06 0.06 7 Glyphosate : 46 1.1 0.41 0.45 482 MCPA : 45 1.1 0.28 0.30 321 Thifensulfuron : 14 1.0 0.01 0.01 4 Tribenuron-methyl : 16 1.0 0.005 0.005 2 Trifluralin : 10 1.0 0.41 0.41 92 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for the 2 Program States was 2.3 million acres. States included are MT and ND. Durum Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Montana, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 27 1.0 0.25 0.26 40 Clodinafop-propargil : 28 1.0 0.07 0.07 11 Dicamba : 56 1.5 0.07 0.10 32 Fenoxaprop : 29 1.7 0.05 0.09 15 Glyphosate : 48 1.3 0.39 0.48 131 MCPA : 30 1.6 0.25 0.40 69 Tribenuron-methyl : 12 1.0 0.004 0.004 2/ Trifluralin : 15 1.0 0.43 0.43 37 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Montana was 570,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Durum Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Dakota, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 39 1.0 0.40 0.41 281 Clodinafop-propargil : 13 1.0 0.04 0.04 8 Dicamba : 12 1.0 0.09 0.09 19 Fenoxaprop : 55 1.0 0.05 0.05 52 Flucarbazone-sodium : 5 1.0 0.01 0.01 1 Glyphosate : 45 1.0 0.42 0.44 351 MCPA : 50 1.0 0.28 0.28 251 Tribenuron-methyl : 17 1.0 0.005 0.005 1 Trifluralin : 8 1.0 0.40 0.40 56 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for North Dakota was 1.8 million acres. Peanuts: Fertilizer Use by State, 2004 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied State : Planted :--------------------------------------------------------- : Acreage : Nitrogen : Phosphate : Potash ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent Mil. Percent Mil. Percent Mil. : Acres lbs lbs lbs : : AL : 200 70 4.3 79 8.6 75 12.4 FL : 145 71 3.3 80 5.4 94 12.7 GA : 620 48 5.3 59 17.5 51 23.7 NC : 105 37 1.0 35 1.2 64 6.7 TX : 240 86 14.4 77 10.6 62 9.3 : Total : 1,310 60 28.3 66 43.3 63 64.8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peanuts: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : Alabama : 200 Nitrogen : 70 1.2 26 31 4.3 Phosphate : 79 1.2 46 54 8.6 Potash : 75 1.2 70 82 12.4 : Florida : 145 Nitrogen : 71 1.3 24 33 3.3 Phosphate : 80 1.2 40 47 5.4 Potash : 94 1.2 76 93 12.7 : Georgia : 620 Nitrogen : 48 1.2 15 18 5.3 Phosphate : 59 1.1 42 48 17.5 Potash : 51 1.1 65 74 23.7 : North Carolina : 105 Nitrogen : 37 1.3 20 25 1.0 Phosphate : 35 1.0 32 33 1.2 Potash : 64 1.1 94 101 6.7 : Texas : 240 Nitrogen : 86 1.7 41 70 14.4 Phosphate : 77 1.1 53 57 10.6 Potash : 62 1.1 57 63 9.3 : Total : 1,310 Nitrogen : 60 1.3 27 36 28.3 Phosphate : 66 1.1 45 50 43.3 Potash : 63 1.1 69 79 64.8 : ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Peanuts: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2004 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :---------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : AL : FL : GA : NC : TX ----------------------------------------------------------------------- : Herbicides : 2,4-D : P * P P * 2,4-DB, Dimeth. salt : P P P P P P 3-Pyridinecarb acid : P P P P P P Acifluorfen : P P P * P * Alachlor : * * Bentazon : P * P P P * Carfentrazone-ethyl : * * Chlorimuron-ethyl : P P P * * Clethodim : P * P P P * Diclosulam : P P * P P * Dimethenamid : * * * Dimethenamid-P : * * * Ethalfluralin : P P P P * * Fluazifop-P-butyl : * * * Flumioxazin : P * P * Glyphosate : P * P P * P Glyphosate diam salt : * * Imazethapyr : P * * P P Metolachlor : P * * P * Paraquat : P P * P P * Pendimethalin : P P P P P P Pyridinecarb. acid : P P P P * * S-Metolachlor : P P P P P P Sethoxydim : P P P P P P Trifluralin : P P * * * P ----------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Peanuts: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2004 (continued) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :---------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : AL : FL : GA : NC : TX ----------------------------------------------------------------------- : Insecticides : Acephate : P P * * P Aldicarb : P P * P P * Bt (Bacillus thur.) : * * Carbaryl : P P * * * Chlorpyrifos : P * * P P Cyfluthrin : * * Cypermethrin : * * Dimethoate : * * Disulfoton : P * * * * Esfenvalerate : P * P P P * Lambda-cyhalothrin : P P * P P * Methomyl : P * P P * Phorate : P P P P * * Propargite : * * 1 Spinosad : * * Zeta-cypermethrin : * * : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : P * * P P P Basic copper sulfate : * * Boscalid : * * Chlorothalonil : P P P P P P Copper hydroxide : * * Fluazinam : P P Flutolanil : P * P * Mancozeb : * * Maneb : * * Mefenoxam : * * Metalaxyl : * * PCNB : * * Propiconazole : P P P P P P Pyraclostrobin : P P P P P P Sulfur : P * P * * * Tebuconazole : P P P P P P Thiophanate-methyl : P * * * * Trifloxystrobin : P P P * * * : Other Chemicals : Chloropicrin : * * Dichloropropene : * * * Metam-sodium : P P ----------------------------------------------------------------------- P Usage data are published for this active ingredient. * Usage data are not published for this active ingredient. 1 Active ingredient used only as a spot treatment; rate per acre application number, total applied, and area applied not available Peanuts: Pesticide, Planted Acreage, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied Program States and Total, 2004 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Area Receiving and Total Applied State :Planted:---------------------------------------------------------------------- :Acreage: Herbicide : Insecticide 1/ : Fungicide : Other --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 : Acres lbs lbs lbs lbs : : AL : 200 100 277 81 200 100 896 FL 2/ : 145 100 298 88 199 100 835 GA 2/ : 620 99 878 77 569 99 2,275 NC : 105 100 221 92 161 96 164 43 1,404 TX : 240 94 258 3 2 67 154 : Total : 1,310 98 1,932 66 1,131 93 4,324 4 1,741 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Total Applied excludes Bt's (Bacillus thuringiensis) and other biologicals. Quantities are not available because amounts of active ingredient are not comparable between products. 2/ Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more pesticide classes. Peanuts: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 4 1.6 0.49 0.76 37 2,4-DB, Dimeth. salt : 45 1.5 0.23 0.34 203 3-Pyridinecarb acid : 52 1.0 0.01 0.01 7 Acifluorfen : 14 1.0 0.31 0.32 61 Bentazon : 30 1.1 0.49 0.54 211 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 7 1.0 0.009 0.009 1 Clethodim : 9 1.3 0.14 0.19 22 Diclosulam : 13 1.0 0.02 0.02 4 Ethalfluralin : 36 1.0 0.70 0.70 327 Flumioxazin : 4 1.0 0.07 0.07 4 Glyphosate : 18 1.2 0.67 0.80 187 Imazethapyr : 4 1.0 0.03 0.03 2 Metolachlor : 3 1.0 1.89 1.89 66 Paraquat : 36 1.0 0.16 0.17 77 Pendimethalin : 40 1.0 0.80 0.81 425 Pyridinecarb. acid : 12 1.0 0.05 0.05 8 S-Metolachlor : 13 1.1 1.28 1.41 232 Sethoxydim : 5 1.3 0.18 0.23 16 Trifluralin : 3 1.1 0.62 0.68 24 : Insecticides : Acephate : 7 1.5 0.58 0.88 81 Aldicarb : 27 1.1 1.08 1.16 404 Carbaryl : 1 1.8 0.56 1.02 15 Chlorpyrifos : 9 1.1 1.61 1.85 209 Disulfoton : 1 1.0 0.82 0.82 12 Esfenvalerate : 15 1.2 0.04 0.05 9 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 9 1.3 0.02 0.03 3 Methomyl : 9 1.6 0.40 0.63 76 Phorate : 24 1.0 1.00 1.00 321 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 17 1.5 0.26 0.40 90 Chlorothalonil : 77 3.8 0.92 3.50 3,542 Fluazinam : 1 1.8 0.45 0.80 9 Flutolanil : 7 1.6 0.67 1.08 95 Propiconazole : 29 2.3 0.07 0.17 64 Pyraclostrobin : 22 1.7 0.17 0.29 83 Sulfur : 4 2.4 0.94 2.20 106 Tebuconazole : 47 2.3 0.19 0.44 271 Thiophanate-methyl : 2 1.0 0.21 0.22 5 Trifloxystrobin : 4 2.4 0.06 0.16 9 : Other Chemicals : Metam-sodium : 3 1.0 31.19 31.19 1,404 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for the 5 Program States was 1.3 million acres. States included are AL, FL, GA, NC, and TX. Peanuts: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Alabama, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-DB, Dimeth. salt : 65 1.3 0.25 0.34 44 3-Pyridinecarb acid : 53 1.0 0.01 0.01 1 Acifluorfen : 16 1.1 0.38 0.42 13 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 8 1.0 0.009 0.009 2/ Diclosulam : 26 1.0 0.02 0.02 1 Ethalfluralin : 53 1.0 0.70 0.70 74 Paraquat : 49 1.0 0.15 0.15 15 Pendimethalin : 29 1.0 0.85 0.85 49 Pyridinecarb. acid : 20 1.0 0.03 0.03 1 S-Metolachlor : 6 1.1 1.11 1.19 15 Sethoxydim : 11 1.3 0.16 0.21 4 Trifluralin : 2 1.0 0.51 0.51 2 : Insecticides : Acephate : 18 2.1 0.70 1.50 54 Aldicarb : 17 1.0 1.21 1.21 41 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 14 1.1 0.03 0.03 1 Phorate : 48 1.0 0.97 0.97 93 : Fungicides : Chlorothalonil : 91 4.7 0.93 4.39 803 Propiconazole : 45 3.2 0.07 0.21 19 Pyraclostrobin : 13 2.4 0.15 0.36 9 Tebuconazole : 37 2.5 0.19 0.49 37 Trifloxystrobin : 14 3.2 0.06 0.20 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Alabama was 200,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Peanuts: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Florida, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 10 1.1 0.57 0.61 9 2,4-DB, Dimeth. salt : 42 2.2 0.26 0.56 34 3-Pyridinecarb acid : 47 1.0 0.01 0.01 1 Acifluorfen : 25 1.0 0.38 0.38 14 Bentazon : 31 1.5 0.51 0.74 33 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 20 1.1 0.01 0.01 2/ Clethodim : 24 1.4 0.14 0.19 7 Glyphosate : 44 1.3 0.63 0.83 54 Pendimethalin : 49 1.0 0.81 0.81 58 Pyridinecarb. acid : 43 1.1 0.06 0.06 4 S-Metolachlor : 27 1.0 1.26 1.29 51 Sethoxydim : 10 1.0 0.12 0.12 2 : Insecticides : Carbaryl : 8 2.0 0.53 1.05 13 Esfenvalerate : 31 1.7 0.05 0.09 4 Methomyl : 31 2.6 0.41 1.05 47 Phorate : 42 1.0 1.01 1.01 61 : Fungicides : Chlorothalonil : 87 4.9 1.14 5.56 704 Propiconazole : 29 1.3 0.07 0.09 4 Pyraclostrobin : 20 2.3 0.16 0.37 11 Sulfur : 16 1.5 1.49 2.20 52 Tebuconazole : 48 1.6 0.16 0.25 18 Trifloxystrobin : 9 1.2 0.10 0.11 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Florida was 145,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Peanuts: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Georgia, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 5 1.8 0.49 0.86 28 2,4-DB, Dimeth. salt : 44 1.5 0.22 0.32 87 3-Pyridinecarb acid : 66 1.0 0.009 0.01 4 Bentazon : 38 1.0 0.47 0.49 116 Clethodim : 8 1.4 0.13 0.19 9 Diclosulam : 16 1.0 0.02 0.02 2 Ethalfluralin : 46 1.0 0.73 0.73 206 Glyphosate : 12 1.1 0.70 0.79 60 Paraquat : 47 1.0 0.17 0.17 50 Pendimethalin : 40 1.0 0.87 0.88 216 Pyridinecarb. acid : 8 1.0 0.06 0.06 3 S-Metolachlor : 3 1.0 1.84 1.84 34 Sethoxydim : 4 1.5 0.21 0.30 8 : Insecticides : Aldicarb : 38 1.1 1.05 1.17 275 Chlorpyrifos : 10 1.0 1.90 1.90 113 Esfenvalerate : 16 1.0 0.03 0.03 3 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 11 1.3 0.02 0.03 2 Methomyl : 9 1.0 0.42 0.42 24 Phorate : 22 1.0 1.03 1.03 140 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 15 1.8 0.26 0.48 45 Chlorothalonil : 92 3.8 0.86 3.25 1,856 Flutolanil : 11 1.6 0.69 1.08 77 Propiconazole : 33 2.3 0.07 0.17 34 Pyraclostrobin : 24 1.5 0.18 0.28 41 Tebuconazole : 55 2.6 0.20 0.50 170 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Georgia was 620,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Peanuts: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Carolina, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-DB, Dimeth. salt : 73 1.2 0.21 0.27 20 3-Pyridinecarb acid : 22 1.0 0.01 0.01 2/ Acifluorfen : 35 1.1 0.29 0.32 12 Bentazon : 54 1.1 0.49 0.53 30 Clethodim : 20 1.0 0.16 0.16 3 Diclosulam : 9 1.0 0.02 0.02 2/ Flumioxazin : 15 1.0 0.07 0.07 1 Imazethapyr : 8 1.0 0.02 0.02 2/ Metolachlor : 4 1.0 1.87 1.90 9 Paraquat : 33 1.1 0.15 0.16 6 Pendimethalin : 36 1.0 0.69 0.71 27 S-Metolachlor : 62 1.2 1.21 1.49 97 Sethoxydim : 5 1.1 0.17 0.18 1 : Insecticides : Acephate : 23 1.3 0.56 0.72 18 Aldicarb : 50 1.0 1.13 1.13 60 Chlorpyrifos : 28 1.0 1.82 1.82 53 Esfenvalerate : 20 1.2 0.03 0.03 1 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 12 1.3 0.02 0.03 2/ : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 16 1.5 0.27 0.40 7 Chlorothalonil : 62 1.6 0.85 1.37 89 Fluazinam : 11 1.8 0.45 0.80 9 Propiconazole : 28 1.6 0.07 0.11 3 Pyraclostrobin : 42 1.6 0.16 0.26 11 Tebuconazole : 82 2.1 0.20 0.41 35 : Other Chemicals : Metam-sodium : 43 1.0 31.19 31.19 1,404 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for North Carolina was 105,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Peanuts: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Texas, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-DB, Dimeth. salt : 20 1.3 0.29 0.36 17 3-Pyridinecarb acid : 29 1.0 0.009 0.009 1 Glyphosate : 24 1.2 0.69 0.83 49 Imazethapyr : 15 1.0 0.03 0.03 1 Pendimethalin : 46 1.0 0.68 0.68 74 S-Metolachlor : 11 1.0 1.23 1.23 34 Sethoxydim : 1 1.0 0.24 0.25 1 Trifluralin : 11 1.1 0.60 0.68 17 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 36 1.1 0.27 0.31 27 Chlorothalonil : 27 1.4 0.95 1.38 91 Propiconazole : 6 1.1 0.19 0.22 3 Pyraclostrobin : 18 1.2 0.20 0.24 10 Tebuconazole : 18 1.4 0.19 0.27 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Texas was 240,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Soybeans: Fertilizer Use by State, 2004 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied State : Planted :--------------------------------------------------------- : Acreage : Nitrogen : Phosphate : Potash ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent Mil. Percent Mil. Percent Mil. : Acres lbs lbs lbs : : AR : 3,200 10 9.3 38 67.2 38 98.4 IL : 9,950 14 49.5 18 185.1 32 525.2 IN : 5,550 15 30.7 25 121.4 40 331.5 IA : 10,200 10 38.4 11 99.8 15 157.2 KS : 2,800 22 22.0 25 34.2 5 7.1 MN : 7,300 19 41.3 18 81.2 16 85.6 MO : 5,000 20 23.4 35 128.1 38 206.3 NE : 4,800 25 24.6 28 76.8 7 12.4 ND : 3,750 64 61.3 63 113.1 11 15.7 OH : 4,450 20 19.0 24 73.0 43 282.0 SD : 4,150 42 38.6 45 116.0 8 12.5 : Total : 61,150 21 358.1 26 1,095.9 23 1,733.9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Soybeans: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : Arkansas : 3,200 Nitrogen : 10 1.4 22 31 9.3 Phosphate : 38 1.3 42 55 67.2 Potash : 38 1.3 61 81 98.4 : Illinois : 9,950 Nitrogen : 14 1.6 22 36 49.5 Phosphate : 18 1.6 66 103 185.1 Potash : 32 1.6 103 164 525.2 : Indiana : 5,550 Nitrogen : 15 1.6 24 38 30.7 Phosphate : 25 1.5 58 88 121.4 Potash : 40 1.5 100 150 331.5 : Iowa : 10,200 Nitrogen : 10 1.6 24 39 38.4 Phosphate : 11 1.5 58 90 99.8 Potash : 15 1.5 71 103 157.2 : Kansas : 2,800 Nitrogen : 22 1.9 19 36 22.0 Phosphate : 25 1.5 32 48 34.2 Potash : 5 1.8 29 52 7.1 : Minnesota : 7,300 Nitrogen : 19 1.7 17 30 41.3 Phosphate : 18 1.5 39 60 81.2 Potash : 16 1.6 46 76 85.6 : Missouri : 5,000 Nitrogen : 20 1.5 16 24 23.4 Phosphate : 35 1.5 49 72 128.1 Potash : 38 1.5 73 109 206.3 : Nebraska : 4,800 Nitrogen : 25 1.4 14 20 24.6 Phosphate : 28 1.4 41 57 76.8 Potash : 7 1.4 27 37 12.4 : North Dakota : 3,750 Nitrogen : 64 1.4 19 25 61.3 Phosphate : 63 1.3 36 48 113.1 Potash : 11 1.5 26 39 15.7 : Ohio : 4,450 Nitrogen : 20 1.5 14 22 19.0 Phosphate : 24 1.5 46 68 73.0 Potash : 43 1.4 103 148 282.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --continued Soybeans: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2004 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : South Dakota : 4,150 Nitrogen : 42 1.5 15 22 38.6 Phosphate : 45 1.4 44 62 116.0 Potash : 8 1.6 22 36 12.5 : Total : 61,150 Nitrogen : 21 1.5 18 28 358.1 Phosphate : 26 1.5 47 69 1,095.9 Potash : 23 1.5 81 121 1,733.9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Soybeans: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2004 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :--------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : AR : IL : IN : IA : KS : MN ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Herbicides : 2,4-D : P P P * * 2,4-D, Dimeth. salt : * * 2,4-DB, Dimeth. salt : * 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : P * * P * Acetamide : P * * * * Acetic acid (2,4-D) : P P P * * Acetochlor : * * Acifluorfen : P * * * * Alachlor : P * * * * Atrazine : * * * Barban : * * * Bentazon : P * Butoxy. ester 2,4-D : P * P * * Carfentrazone-ethyl : * * * Chlorimuron-ethyl : P P P P P P * Clethodim : P * P * P P P Clomazone : * 1 * * Cloransulam-methyl : P * P P P P Dicamba : * 1 Dicamba, Dimet. salt : * * Dichlorprop : * * Dimethenamid-P : * Ethalfluralin : * * Fenoxaprop : P P P * * * Fluazifop-P-butyl : P P P * * Flumetsulam : P * * * Flumiclorac-pentyl : P * * * * * Flumioxazin : P P P * * * Fomesafen : P P P P P P Glyphosate : P P P P P P P Glyphosate diam salt : P * P P * * * Imazamethabenz : * * Imazamox : P P P P Imazaquin : P * * P * Imazethapyr : P P P P * P Lactofen : P P * P * * Linuron : * * MCPA, sodium salt : P * P * Mesotrione : * * Metolachlor : P * * * * Metribuzin : P P * P * Nicosulfuron : * 1 * Paraquat : P * * Pendimethalin : P P P P P P Primisulfuron : * 1 * Propanoic acid : * * Prosulfuron : * * Quizalofop-P-ethyl : P * * * Quizalofop-ethyl : * * Rimsulfuron : * * S-Metolachlor : P * P * P * Sethoxydim : P * * * * * Simazine : * * Sulfentrazone : P P P P * * Sulfosate : P * P * P * P Thifensulfuron : P P * * * * Tribenuron-methyl : P P Triclopyr : 1 1 Trifluralin : P * P P * P ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Soybeans: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2004 (continued) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :--------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : AR : IL : IN : IA : KS : MN ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Insecticides : Benzoic acid : * * Carbofuran : * * Chlorpyrifos : P * Cyfluthrin : * Dimethoate : * * * Endosulfan : * * Esfenvalerate : P * Fipronil : * Imidacloprid : * * Lambda-cyhalothrin : P P * * P * * Methyl parathion : P * Permethrin : P * Zeta-cypermethrin : P * * * * : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : P P * * Mefenoxam : * PCNB : * Triadimefon : * : Other Chemicals : Garlic oil : * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Soybeans: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2004 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :------------------------- Active Ingredient : MO : NE : ND : OH : SD ------------------------------------------------------------- : Herbicides : 2,4-D : P * P 2,4-D, Dimeth. salt : 2,4-DB, Dimeth. salt : * 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : * * Acetamide : P * * Acetic acid (2,4-D) : * P * Acetochlor : Acifluorfen : * Alachlor : P Atrazine : * * Barban : * Bentazon : * P * Butoxy. ester 2,4-D : * * P * Carfentrazone-ethyl : * * Chlorimuron-ethyl : P P P * Clethodim : * * * P P Clomazone : * Cloransulam-methyl : * * * P * Dicamba : * * Dicamba, Dimet. salt : Dichlorprop : Dimethenamid-P : * Ethalfluralin : * Fenoxaprop : * * * Fluazifop-P-butyl : * * * Flumetsulam : * Flumiclorac-pentyl : P Flumioxazin : * * P * Fomesafen : * * P P Glyphosate : P P P P P Glyphosate diam salt : P P * P P Imazamethabenz : Imazamox : * P * * Imazaquin : * * P Imazethapyr : * P P P P Lactofen : * * Linuron : MCPA, sodium salt : P Mesotrione : Metolachlor : Metribuzin : * P P * Nicosulfuron : Paraquat : * * Pendimethalin : P P * * P Primisulfuron : Propanoic acid : Prosulfuron : Quizalofop-P-ethyl : * * * * Quizalofop-ethyl : * * Rimsulfuron : S-Metolachlor : * P * Sethoxydim : P Simazine : * Sulfentrazone : P P * P * Sulfosate : * * P P Thifensulfuron : * * P Tribenuron-methyl : * * Triclopyr : Trifluralin : P P P * P ------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Soybeans: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2004 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :------------------------- Active Ingredient : MO : NE : ND : OH : SD ------------------------------------------------------------- : Insecticides : Benzoic acid : * Carbofuran : Chlorpyrifos : P * Cyfluthrin : * * * Dimethoate : Endosulfan : Esfenvalerate : * * P Fipronil : * Imidacloprid : Lambda-cyhalothrin : * * P P Methyl parathion : * Permethrin : * * * Zeta-cypermethrin : * * * * : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : * * Mefenoxam : * PCNB : * Triadimefon : * : Other Chemicals : Garlic oil : * ------------------------------------------------------------- P Usage data are published for this active ingredient. * Usage data are not published for this active ingredient. 1 Active ingredient used only as a spot treatment; rate per acre application number, total applied, and area applied not available Soybeans: Pesticide, Planted Acreage, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied Program States and Total, 2004 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Area Receiving and Total Applied State :Planted:---------------------------------------------------------------------- :Acreage: Herbicide : Insecticide : Fungicide : Other --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 : Acres lbs lbs lbs lbs : : AR : 3,200 92 3,642 7 57 6 23 IL 1/ : 9,950 98 10,832 1 15 IN 1/ : 5,550 99 7,037 IA :10,200 98 11,964 1 5 KS 1/ : 2,800 97 3,225 MN 1/ : 7,300 98 8,289 MO 1/ : 5,000 98 5,394 NE 1/ : 4,800 94 5,625 15 274 ND 1/ : 3,750 99 4,460 OH : 4,450 98 5,597 3 6 2 8 SD : 4,150 96 4,763 19 70 : Total1/ :61,150 97 70,828 4 497 1 52 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more pesticide classes. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 2 1.1 0.46 0.51 771 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 1 1.1 0.42 0.46 200 Acetamide : 1 1.0 0.23 0.23 99 Acetic acid (2,4-D) : 1 1.0 0.47 0.47 375 Acifluorfen : * 1.0 0.20 0.20 52 Alachlor : * 1.0 1.46 1.46 240 Bentazon : * 1.5 0.72 1.05 221 Butoxy. ester 2,4-D : 1 1.0 0.39 0.41 236 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 7 1.0 0.02 0.02 77 Clethodim : 2 1.0 0.10 0.10 145 Cloransulam-methyl : 2 1.0 0.03 0.03 36 Fenoxaprop : 1 1.1 0.11 0.12 88 Fluazifop-P-butyl : 1 1.1 0.03 0.04 25 Flumetsulam : * 1.0 0.04 0.04 9 Flumiclorac-pentyl : 1 1.0 0.02 0.02 6 Flumioxazin : 1 1.0 0.07 0.07 57 Fomesafen : 2 1.2 0.20 0.23 346 Glyphosate : 87 1.5 0.73 1.08 57,701 Glyphosate diam salt : 2 1.3 0.70 0.91 1,184 Imazamox : 2 1.0 0.03 0.03 27 Imazaquin : 1 1.1 0.09 0.10 36 Imazethapyr : 3 1.0 0.05 0.05 97 Lactofen : 1 1.0 0.11 0.11 56 MCPA, sodium salt : 1 1.0 0.68 0.68 272 Metolachlor : * 1.0 1.60 1.60 164 Metribuzin : 2 1.0 0.24 0.24 278 Paraquat : * 1.0 0.67 0.67 115 Pendimethalin : 4 1.0 0.86 0.87 2,082 Quizalofop-P-ethyl : * 1.0 0.05 0.05 12 S-Metolachlor : 1 1.0 1.22 1.28 725 Sethoxydim : * 1.2 0.21 0.25 59 Sulfentrazone : 6 1.1 0.11 0.12 462 Sulfosate : 2 1.2 1.20 1.49 1,613 Thifensulfuron : 1 1.0 0.002 0.002 1 Tribenuron-methyl : * 1.0 0.007 0.007 1 Trifluralin : 5 1.0 0.83 0.84 2,689 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 1 1.0 0.45 0.45 309 Esfenvalerate : * 1.0 0.06 0.06 13 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 1 1.0 0.02 0.02 16 Methyl parathion : * 1.0 0.34 0.34 48 Permethrin : * 1.0 0.10 0.10 11 Zeta-cypermethrin : * 1.0 0.03 0.03 9 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 1 1.0 0.13 0.14 44 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Area applied is less than 0.5 percent. 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for the 11 Program States was 61.2 million acres. States included are AR, IL, IN, IA, KS, MN, MO, NE, ND, OH, and SD. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Arkansas, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : Chlorimuron-ethyl : 2 1.2 0.008 0.01 1 Fomesafen : 5 1.6 0.14 0.23 41 Glyphosate : 90 1.7 0.73 1.21 3,495 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 4 1.0 0.01 0.01 1 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 6 1.0 0.12 0.13 23 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Arkansas was 3.2 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Illinois, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 5 1.0 0.42 0.42 224 Acetic acid (2,4-D) : 4 1.0 0.43 0.43 167 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 10 1.0 0.02 0.02 17 Clethodim : 3 1.0 0.09 0.09 24 Cloransulam-methyl : 2 1.0 0.03 0.03 8 Fenoxaprop : 2 1.0 0.11 0.11 24 Fluazifop-P-butyl : 2 1.0 0.03 0.03 7 Flumioxazin : 3 1.0 0.06 0.06 20 Fomesafen : 3 1.0 0.24 0.24 79 Glyphosate : 83 1.3 0.74 0.99 8,232 Glyphosate diam salt : 5 1.2 0.64 0.80 430 Imazamox : 3 1.0 0.03 0.03 9 Imazethapyr : 3 1.0 0.06 0.06 15 Lactofen : 2 1.0 0.10 0.10 16 Metribuzin : 3 1.0 0.30 0.30 76 Pendimethalin : 3 1.0 1.00 1.00 328 S-Metolachlor : 1 1.0 1.26 1.26 143 Sulfentrazone : 9 1.1 0.09 0.10 92 Sulfosate : 2 1.2 1.22 1.50 351 Thifensulfuron : 1 1.0 0.001 0.001 2/ Trifluralin : 3 1.0 0.99 0.99 283 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Illinois was 10.0 million acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Indiana, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 4 1.0 0.39 0.39 94 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 3 1.1 0.46 0.53 88 Acetic acid (2,4-D) : 4 1.0 0.54 0.54 117 Butoxy. ester 2,4-D : 3 1.0 0.43 0.43 80 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 12 1.0 0.02 0.02 12 Cloransulam-methyl : 1 1.0 0.02 0.02 2 Fenoxaprop : 3 1.0 0.15 0.15 25 Fluazifop-P-butyl : 3 1.0 0.04 0.04 7 Flumioxazin : 2 1.0 0.05 0.05 6 Fomesafen : 5 1.0 0.27 0.27 78 Glyphosate : 92 1.5 0.74 1.13 5,765 Glyphosate diam salt : 2 1.5 0.91 1.35 129 Imazaquin : 2 1.2 0.07 0.08 9 Imazethapyr : 2 1.0 0.04 0.04 5 MCPA, sodium salt : 3 1.0 0.67 0.67 98 Pendimethalin : 2 1.0 0.68 0.68 64 Sulfentrazone : 9 1.0 0.10 0.10 52 Tribenuron-methyl : 2 1.0 0.009 0.009 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Indiana was 5.6 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Iowa, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : Chlorimuron-ethyl : 6 1.1 0.02 0.02 13 Clethodim : 2 1.0 0.07 0.07 15 Cloransulam-methyl : 3 1.0 0.02 0.02 6 Fomesafen : 2 1.4 0.19 0.26 57 Glyphosate : 87 1.4 0.74 1.01 9,012 Imazamox : 1 1.0 0.03 0.03 4 Imazethapyr : 5 1.1 0.05 0.06 28 Lactofen : 1 1.0 0.10 0.10 15 Metribuzin : 1 1.0 0.24 0.24 28 Pendimethalin : 7 1.0 0.82 0.84 641 S-Metolachlor : 1 1.0 1.52 1.52 204 Sulfentrazone : 8 1.1 0.11 0.12 97 Sulfosate : 2 1.6 1.09 1.74 368 Trifluralin : 14 1.0 0.78 0.79 1,152 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 1 1.0 0.02 0.02 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Iowa was 10.2 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Kansas, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : Chlorimuron-ethyl : 4 1.1 0.008 0.009 1 Clethodim : 5 1.0 0.09 0.09 13 Glyphosate : 93 1.7 0.67 1.13 2,936 Pendimethalin : 4 1.0 0.79 0.79 81 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Kansas was 2.8 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Minnesota, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : Clethodim : 3 1.1 0.15 0.16 38 Cloransulam-methyl : 5 1.1 0.03 0.03 12 Fomesafen : 3 1.2 0.17 0.20 41 Glyphosate : 83 1.6 0.72 1.11 6,762 Imazamox : 4 1.0 0.02 0.02 7 Imazethapyr : 3 1.0 0.04 0.04 9 Pendimethalin : 4 1.0 0.80 0.80 235 Sulfosate : 2 1.0 1.16 1.16 198 Trifluralin : 11 1.0 0.79 0.81 651 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Minnesota was 7.3 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Missouri, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 4 1.7 0.63 1.08 238 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 7 1.0 0.02 0.02 8 Flumiclorac-pentyl : 3 1.1 0.02 0.02 2 Glyphosate : 90 1.3 0.79 1.05 4,717 Glyphosate diam salt : 1 1.2 0.74 0.87 42 Pendimethalin : 2 1.0 0.92 0.92 81 Sulfentrazone : 6 1.1 0.13 0.14 41 Trifluralin : 2 1.2 1.08 1.26 130 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Missouri was 5.0 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Nebraska, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : Acetamide : 5 1.0 0.15 0.15 39 Alachlor : 2 1.0 1.48 1.48 130 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 5 1.0 0.03 0.03 8 Glyphosate : 87 1.5 0.73 1.06 4,447 Glyphosate diam salt : 4 1.2 0.73 0.91 168 Imazethapyr : 6 1.0 0.05 0.05 14 Metribuzin : 6 1.0 0.19 0.19 55 Pendimethalin : 9 1.0 0.88 0.88 380 Sulfentrazone : 6 1.1 0.15 0.17 48 Trifluralin : 5 1.0 0.75 0.75 165 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 11 1.0 0.46 0.46 255 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Nebraska was 4.8 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Dakota, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : Bentazon : 4 1.6 0.79 1.28 185 Fomesafen : 2 1.1 0.14 0.15 13 Glyphosate : 88 1.9 0.65 1.20 3,963 Imazamox : 5 1.0 0.02 0.02 4 Imazethapyr : 5 1.1 0.04 0.05 9 Sethoxydim : 3 1.4 0.23 0.32 37 Trifluralin : 3 1.0 1.04 1.04 112 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for North Dakota was 3.8 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Ohio, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 5 1.0 0.46 0.47 114 Acetic acid (2,4-D) : 3 1.0 0.52 0.52 58 Butoxy. ester 2,4-D : 1 1.0 0.51 0.51 29 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 16 1.0 0.02 0.02 14 Clethodim : 5 1.0 0.11 0.11 25 Cloransulam-methyl : 4 1.0 0.03 0.03 5 Flumioxazin : 2 1.0 0.08 0.08 8 Fomesafen : 2 1.0 0.26 0.26 21 Glyphosate : 87 1.4 0.79 1.12 4,332 Glyphosate diam salt : 2 1.2 0.81 0.95 81 Imazaquin : 3 1.0 0.12 0.12 16 Imazethapyr : 2 1.0 0.05 0.05 5 MCPA, sodium salt : 3 1.0 0.79 0.79 96 Metribuzin : 7 1.0 0.29 0.29 90 S-Metolachlor : 5 1.1 1.17 1.33 267 Sulfentrazone : 14 1.0 0.11 0.11 68 Sulfosate : 2 1.3 1.21 1.62 162 Thifensulfuron : 3 1.0 0.002 0.002 2/ : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 2 1.1 0.02 0.02 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Ohio was 4.5 million acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, South Dakota, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : Clethodim : 2 1.2 0.08 0.10 7 Glyphosate : 89 1.6 0.68 1.09 4,040 Glyphosate diam salt : 2 1.0 0.69 0.69 52 Imazethapyr : 3 1.0 0.05 0.05 6 Pendimethalin : 5 1.0 0.83 0.83 168 Sulfosate : 5 1.2 1.26 1.47 276 Trifluralin : 4 1.0 0.89 0.89 158 : Insecticides : Esfenvalerate : 4 1.0 0.05 0.05 8 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 10 1.0 0.02 0.02 8 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for South Dakota was 4.2 million acres. Other Spring Wheat: Fertilizer Use by State, 2004 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied State : Planted :--------------------------------------------------------- : Acreage : Nitrogen : Phosphate : Potash ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent Mil. Percent Mil. Percent Mil. : Acres lbs lbs lbs : : ID : 500 93 56.1 63 12.7 23 4.4 MN : 1,700 98 180.1 91 75.5 54 34.8 MT : 3,000 79 134.6 69 72.6 13 9.0 ND : 6,200 98 691.9 86 269.0 27 39.9 OR : 180 91 9.7 28 1.7 9 0.5 SD : 1,600 92 132.5 68 53.2 19 8.5 WA : 530 100 45.4 67 7.4 9 2.1 : Total : 13,710 93 1,250.3 79 492.1 25 99.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Spring Wheat: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : Idaho : 500 Nitrogen : 93 1.7 71 121 56.1 Phosphate : 63 1.2 33 41 12.7 Potash : 23 1.2 30 37 4.4 : Minnesota : 1,700 Nitrogen : 98 1.6 67 108 180.1 Phosphate : 91 1.1 43 49 75.5 Potash : 54 1.2 32 38 34.8 : Montana : 3,000 Nitrogen : 79 1.7 34 57 134.6 Phosphate : 69 1.3 26 35 72.6 Potash : 13 1.4 16 22 9.0 : North Dakota : 6,200 Nitrogen : 98 2.5 46 114 691.9 Phosphate : 86 1.6 32 50 269.0 Potash : 27 1.5 16 24 39.9 : Oregon : 180 Nitrogen : 91 1.2 50 59 9.7 Phosphate : 28 1.1 32 34 1.7 Potash : 9 1.0 33 34 0.5 : South Dakota : 1,600 Nitrogen : 92 1.7 54 90 132.5 Phosphate : 68 1.2 40 49 53.2 Potash : 19 1.3 22 28 8.5 : Washington : 530 Nitrogen : 100 1.4 59 86 45.4 Phosphate : 67 1.2 17 21 7.4 Potash : 9 1.1 38 43 2.1 : Total : 13,710 Nitrogen : 93 2.0 48 98 1,250.3 Phosphate : 79 1.4 33 46 492.1 Potash : 25 1.4 21 29 99.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Other Spring Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2004 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :-------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : ID : MN : MT : ND : OR : SD : WA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Herbicides : 2,4-D : P P P P P P P P 2,4-D, Dimeth. salt : P * * * * * P 2,4-DB, Dimeth. salt : * * 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : P P P P P P P P Acetic acid (2,4-D) : P * P P P * * * Alachlor : * * * Bromoxynil : P P P P P P P P Bromoxynil octanoate : P P P * P P * Butoxy. ester 2,4-D : P * P * P * Carfentrazone-ethyl : P * * * Chlorsulfuron : P * * * Clodinafop-propargil : P P P P P * * P Clopyralid : P * P * P * * * Dicamba : P * P P P * P P Dicamba, Dimet. salt : * * * * Dicamba, Sodium salt : P * * * Diclofop-methyl : * * * * Difenzoquat : * * * Diuron : * * Fenoxaprop : P P P P P P P P Flucarbazone-sodium : P * P P * P Fluroxypyr : P P P P P * P * Fluroxypyr 1-methylh : P * * * P * * Glyphosate : P P P P P P P P Glyphosate diam salt : * * Imazamethabenz : P * * Imazethapyr : * * MCPA : P P P P P P P P MCPA, dimethyl. salt : P P P * * P P P MCPA-EHE : P * * Metribuzin : * 1 * Metsulfuron-methyl : P * P * P P P Paraquat : * * Picloram : P * * Prosulfuron : P P * * Quizalofop-P-ethyl : * * Sulfosate : * * * * Sulfosulfuron : * * * * Thifensulfuron : P P P P P P P P Tralkoxydim : P P * * Triallate : P * * P Triasulfuron : P P * * Tribenuron-methyl : P P P P P P P P Trifluralin : P * * --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Other Spring Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2004 (continued) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :-------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : ID : MN : MT : ND : OR : SD : WA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Insecticides : Carbofuran : * * Chlorpyrifos : P * * * * Cypermethrin : * * Dimethoate : P * * * Esfenvalerate : * * Lambda-cyhalothrin : * * * * Malathion : * * * Methyl parathion : * * Zeta-cypermethrin : P P : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : * * * * Propiconazole : P * P P P P Pyraclostrobin : P P * * P * Tebuconazole : P P P * P Thiophanate-methyl : * * Trifloxystrobin : P * * P * --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P Usage data are published for this active ingredient. * Usage data are not published for this active ingredient. 1 Active ingredient used only as a spot treatment; rate per acre application number, total applied, and area applied not available Other Spring Wheat: Pesticide, Planted Acreage, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied Program States and Total, 2004 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Area Receiving and Total Applied State :Planted:---------------------------------------------------------------------- :Acreage: Herbicide : Insecticide : Fungicide : Other --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 : Acres lbs lbs lbs lbs : : ID : 500 92 288 4 6 MN : 1,700 99 1,054 10 28 46 84 MT 1/ : 3,000 95 1,652 ND 1/ : 6,200 97 3,452 28 190 OR : 180 95 133 4 1 9 2 SD 1/ : 1,600 89 702 14 26 WA : 530 99 364 4 8 3 2 : Total :13,710 96 7,645 2 52 20 304 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more pesticide classes. Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 20 1.1 0.35 0.39 1,076 2,4-D, Dimeth. salt : 1 1.0 0.19 0.19 39 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 4 1.0 0.41 0.41 212 Acetic acid (2,4-D) : 8 1.0 0.27 0.27 297 Bromoxynil : 16 1.0 0.24 0.24 515 Bromoxynil octanoate : 19 1.0 0.25 0.25 647 Butoxy. ester 2,4-D : 2 1.0 0.39 0.40 134 Carfentrazone-ethyl : * 1.0 0.006 0.006 2/ Chlorsulfuron : * 1.0 0.01 0.01 2/ Clodinafop-propargil : 14 1.0 0.06 0.06 106 Clopyralid : 6 1.0 0.07 0.07 60 Dicamba : 11 1.1 0.08 0.09 135 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 1 1.0 0.08 0.08 8 Fenoxaprop : 31 1.0 0.06 0.06 270 Flucarbazone-sodium : 7 1.0 0.02 0.02 17 Fluroxypyr : 8 1.0 0.08 0.08 89 Fluroxypyr 1-methylh : 6 1.0 0.09 0.09 75 Glyphosate : 23 1.1 0.44 0.49 1,555 Imazamethabenz : * 1.0 0.10 0.10 4 MCPA : 46 1.0 0.29 0.29 1,845 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 2 1.0 0.42 0.42 107 MCPA-EHE : 3 1.0 0.29 0.29 105 Metsulfuron-methyl : 5 1.0 0.003 0.003 2 Picloram : * 1.0 0.02 0.02 1 Prosulfuron : 1 1.0 0.01 0.01 1 Thifensulfuron : 16 1.0 0.009 0.009 19 Tralkoxydim : 1 1.0 0.13 0.14 11 Triallate : 1 1.0 1.19 1.19 161 Triasulfuron : 1 1.0 0.01 0.01 2 Tribenuron-methyl : 14 1.0 0.006 0.006 12 Trifluralin : 1 1.0 0.33 0.33 49 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : * 1.0 0.30 0.30 9 Dimethoate : * 1.0 0.27 0.27 7 Zeta-cypermethrin : * 1.0 0.02 0.02 2/ : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 9 1.0 0.07 0.07 87 Pyraclostrobin : 6 1.0 0.06 0.06 48 Tebuconazole : 12 1.0 0.10 0.10 162 Trifloxystrobin : 1 1.0 0.04 0.04 7 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Area applied is less than 0.5 percent. 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for the 7 Program States was 13.7 million acres. States included are ID, MN, MT, ND, OR, SD, and WA. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Idaho, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 22 1.0 0.33 0.33 37 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 3 1.0 1.26 1.26 21 Bromoxynil : 27 1.0 0.25 0.25 34 Bromoxynil octanoate : 5 1.0 0.29 0.29 7 Clodinafop-propargil : 35 1.0 0.05 0.05 8 Fenoxaprop : 6 1.0 0.08 0.08 3 Fluroxypyr : 19 1.0 0.12 0.12 11 Glyphosate : 8 1.6 0.42 0.68 29 MCPA : 45 1.0 0.37 0.37 83 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 6 1.0 0.67 0.67 19 Prosulfuron : 5 1.0 0.02 0.02 2/ Thifensulfuron : 26 1.0 0.01 0.01 1 Tralkoxydim : 6 1.0 0.16 0.16 5 Tribenuron-methyl : 22 1.1 0.006 0.006 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Idaho was 500,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Minnesota, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 8 1.0 0.55 0.55 76 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 4 1.0 0.37 0.37 25 Acetic acid (2,4-D) : 4 1.0 0.44 0.44 32 Bromoxynil : 12 1.0 0.29 0.29 60 Bromoxynil octanoate : 39 1.0 0.30 0.30 200 Clodinafop-propargil : 13 1.0 0.05 0.05 12 Clopyralid : 14 1.0 0.08 0.08 18 Dicamba : 4 1.0 0.08 0.08 5 Fenoxaprop : 30 1.0 0.08 0.08 43 Flucarbazone-sodium : 13 1.0 0.02 0.02 5 Fluroxypyr : 8 1.0 0.07 0.07 9 Glyphosate : 7 1.0 0.63 0.63 75 MCPA : 68 1.0 0.34 0.35 403 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 5 1.0 0.40 0.40 35 Thifensulfuron : 15 1.0 0.008 0.008 2 Tribenuron-methyl : 9 1.0 0.006 0.006 1 : Fungicides : Pyraclostrobin : 13 1.1 0.06 0.06 14 Tebuconazole : 33 1.0 0.10 0.10 56 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Minnesota was 1.7 million acres. Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Montana, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 33 1.2 0.30 0.37 370 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 2 1.0 0.31 0.31 20 Acetic acid (2,4-D) : 20 1.0 0.20 0.20 121 Bromoxynil : 9 1.0 0.24 0.24 68 Butoxy. ester 2,4-D : 5 1.1 0.34 0.37 61 Clodinafop-propargil : 24 1.0 0.07 0.07 51 Dicamba : 28 1.1 0.08 0.08 70 Fenoxaprop : 20 1.0 0.05 0.05 32 Fluroxypyr : 2 1.0 0.07 0.07 4 Glyphosate : 40 1.1 0.38 0.43 519 MCPA : 13 1.0 0.28 0.28 112 Metsulfuron-methyl : 10 1.0 0.003 0.003 1 Thifensulfuron : 6 1.0 0.006 0.006 1 Triasulfuron : 6 1.0 0.01 0.01 2 Tribenuron-methyl : 8 1.0 0.004 0.004 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Montana was 3.0 million acres. Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Dakota, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 13 1.0 0.40 0.40 328 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 2 1.0 0.48 0.48 73 Acetic acid (2,4-D) : 6 1.0 0.33 0.33 128 Bromoxynil : 20 1.0 0.22 0.22 269 Bromoxynil octanoate : 25 1.0 0.23 0.23 357 Clodinafop-propargil : 11 1.0 0.04 0.04 26 Clopyralid : 7 1.0 0.07 0.07 32 Dicamba : 6 1.0 0.08 0.08 27 Fenoxaprop : 49 1.0 0.06 0.06 186 Flucarbazone-sodium : 11 1.0 0.02 0.02 11 Fluroxypyr : 11 1.0 0.08 0.08 57 Fluroxypyr 1-methylh : 11 1.0 0.10 0.10 65 Glyphosate : 19 1.1 0.49 0.52 623 MCPA : 60 1.0 0.28 0.28 1,031 Thifensulfuron : 16 1.0 0.01 0.01 10 Tribenuron-methyl : 12 1.0 0.009 0.009 7 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 13 1.0 0.08 0.08 66 Tebuconazole : 15 1.0 0.10 0.10 92 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for North Dakota was 6.2 million acres. Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Oregon, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 36 1.0 0.49 0.50 33 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 12 1.0 0.44 0.44 10 Bromoxynil : 5 1.0 0.24 0.24 2 Butoxy. ester 2,4-D : 18 1.0 0.63 0.63 20 Fenoxaprop : 1 1.0 0.10 0.10 2/ Glyphosate : 61 1.1 0.48 0.51 56 MCPA : 6 1.0 0.28 0.28 3 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 2 1.0 0.46 0.46 2 Metsulfuron-methyl : 32 1.0 0.003 0.003 2/ Thifensulfuron : 38 1.0 0.008 0.008 1 Tribenuron-methyl : 39 1.0 0.004 0.004 2/ : Insecticides : Zeta-cypermethrin : 3 1.0 0.02 0.02 2/ : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 3 1.0 0.07 0.07 2/ Trifloxystrobin : 2 1.0 0.08 0.08 2/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Oregon was 180,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, South Dakota, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 25 1.2 0.33 0.40 161 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 9 1.0 0.28 0.28 42 Bromoxynil : 13 1.0 0.22 0.22 45 Bromoxynil octanoate : 16 1.0 0.26 0.26 69 Dicamba : 16 1.1 0.10 0.10 26 Fenoxaprop : 4 1.0 0.07 0.07 4 Fluroxypyr : 8 1.0 0.06 0.06 7 Glyphosate : 14 1.4 0.45 0.63 143 MCPA : 39 1.0 0.25 0.25 154 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 2 1.0 0.23 0.23 7 Metsulfuron-methyl : 9 1.0 0.002 0.002 2/ Thifensulfuron : 22 1.0 0.008 0.008 3 Tribenuron-methyl : 21 1.0 0.005 0.005 2 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 5 1.0 0.07 0.07 6 Pyraclostrobin : 5 1.0 0.05 0.05 4 Tebuconazole : 7 1.0 0.13 0.13 14 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for South Dakota was 1.6 million acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Washington, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 37 1.2 0.31 0.36 72 2,4-D, Dimeth. salt : 4 1.0 0.47 0.47 11 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 9 1.0 0.45 0.45 21 Bromoxynil : 26 1.0 0.27 0.27 37 Clodinafop-propargil : 21 1.0 0.05 0.05 6 Dicamba : 9 1.0 0.09 0.09 4 Fenoxaprop : 5 1.0 0.09 0.09 2 Flucarbazone-sodium : 1 1.0 0.02 0.02 2/ Glyphosate : 48 1.0 0.43 0.43 110 MCPA : 38 1.0 0.29 0.29 59 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 5 1.0 0.50 0.50 13 Metsulfuron-methyl : 22 1.0 0.003 0.003 2/ Thifensulfuron : 36 1.0 0.008 0.008 2 Triallate : 3 1.0 1.07 1.07 16 Tribenuron-methyl : 38 1.0 0.005 0.005 1 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 2 1.0 0.11 0.11 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Washington was 530,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Winter Wheat: Fertilizer Use by State, 2004 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied State : Planted :--------------------------------------------------------- : Acreage : Nitrogen : Phosphate : Potash ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent Mil. Percent Mil. Percent Mil. : Acres lbs lbs lbs : : CO : 2,300 59 51.2 31 15.8 5 2.7 ID : 750 89 89.2 62 18.5 31 6.1 IL : 920 98 103.2 85 74.2 77 92.3 KS : 10,000 90 788.6 62 281.8 6 23.4 MI : 660 97 73.5 71 27.5 77 38.4 MO : 1,050 97 125.9 84 52.9 86 70.0 MT : 1,900 92 83.0 83 47.3 21 3.9 NE : 1,850 73 76.4 42 24.3 3 1.2 OH : 920 100 91.6 95 65.8 90 69.5 OK : 6,200 92 571.0 62 147.8 13 22.0 OR : 820 96 64.7 11 5.3 6 2.5 SD : 1,650 77 105.8 58 44.6 7 5.1 TX : 6,300 64 347.7 35 116.6 9 9.6 WA : 1,800 97 161.2 24 11.6 3 1.4 : Total : 37,120 84 2,733.0 55 934.0 16 348.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Winter Wheat: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : Colorado : 2,300 Nitrogen : 59 1.4 27 38 51.2 Phosphate : 31 1.3 17 23 15.8 Potash : 5 1.1 24 25 2.7 : Idaho : 750 Nitrogen : 89 2.0 68 134 89.2 Phosphate : 62 1.4 29 40 18.5 Potash : 31 1.5 18 26 6.1 : Illinois : 920 Nitrogen : 98 2.1 55 115 103.2 Phosphate : 85 1.3 75 94 74.2 Potash : 77 1.3 104 130 92.3 : Kansas : 10,000 Nitrogen : 90 2.2 39 87 788.6 Phosphate : 62 1.5 29 45 281.8 Potash : 6 1.4 26 37 23.4 : Michigan : 660 Nitrogen : 97 2.2 53 115 73.5 Phosphate : 71 1.2 50 59 27.5 Potash : 77 1.2 64 75 38.4 : Missouri : 1,050 Nitrogen : 97 2.0 61 124 125.9 Phosphate : 84 1.2 50 60 52.9 Potash : 86 1.2 66 78 70.0 : Montana : 1,900 Nitrogen : 92 1.6 30 47 83.0 Phosphate : 83 1.1 28 30 47.3 Potash : 21 1.1 9 10 3.9 : Nebraska : 1,850 Nitrogen : 73 1.8 32 57 76.4 Phosphate : 42 1.2 26 31 24.3 Potash : 3 1.7 13 22 1.2 : Ohio : 920 Nitrogen : 100 2.2 44 100 91.6 Phosphate : 95 1.1 66 75 65.8 Potash : 90 1.2 72 84 69.5 : Oklahoma : 6,200 Nitrogen : 92 2.3 44 100 571.0 Phosphate : 62 1.5 26 39 147.8 Potash : 13 1.4 19 26 22.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --continued Winter Wheat: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2004 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : Oregon : 820 Nitrogen : 96 1.4 57 82 64.7 Phosphate : 11 1.6 35 57 5.3 Potash : 6 1.3 38 50 2.5 : South Dakota : 1,650 Nitrogen : 77 1.6 51 83 105.8 Phosphate : 58 1.2 38 47 44.6 Potash : 7 1.3 33 43 5.1 : Texas : 6,300 Nitrogen : 64 1.8 47 86 347.7 Phosphate : 35 1.4 37 53 116.6 Potash : 9 1.1 15 17 9.6 : Washington : 1,800 Nitrogen : 97 1.5 61 93 161.2 Phosphate : 24 1.6 18 27 11.6 Potash : 3 1.6 17 28 1.4 : Total : 37,120 Nitrogen : 84 2.0 44 88 2,733.0 Phosphate : 55 1.4 33 46 934.0 Potash : 16 1.2 47 58 348.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Winter Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2004 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :-------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : CO : ID : IL : KS : MI : MO : MT --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Herbicides : 2,4-D : P P P * P P * P 2,4-D, Dimeth. salt : P * * P 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : P P P * P P P P Acetamide : P Acetic acid (2,4-D) : P * P P * P * * Acetochlor : * * Acifluorfen : * Alachlor : * * Atrazine : P P * Benefin : * Bromoxynil : P P * * P Bromoxynil octanoate : P P * Butoxy. ester 2,4-D : P * * * * P Carfentrazone-ethyl : P * Chlorsulfuron : P * P * * Clodinafop-propargil : P * P Clopyralid : P * * * * Dicamba : P P P * P * P Dicamba, Sodium salt : * * Diclofop-methyl : P * Difenzoquat : * Diuron : P Fenoxaprop : P * * Flucarbazone-sodium : P * Fluroxypyr : P P * * Fluroxypyr 1-methylh : P * * * Glyphosate : P P P * P P * P Glyphosate diam salt : * Halosulfuron : 1 1 Imazamethabenz : * * * Imazamox : P * * * MCPA : P P * * P MCPA, dimethyl. salt : P P * * MCPA, sodium salt : * Mesosulfuron-Methyl : P * Metribuzin : P * P Metsulfuron-methyl : P P P P * P Oryzalin : * Paraquat : * Picloram : P * * Prosulfuron : P * * Quinclorac : * * Sulfentrazone : * * Sulfosulfuron : P * P * Thifensulfuron : P P P P * P P P Tralkoxydim : P * * Triallate : P * Triasulfuron : P * * P P Tribenuron-methyl : P P P P P P P P --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Winter Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2004 (continued) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :-------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : CO : ID : IL : KS : MI : MO : MT --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Insecticides : Azinphos-methyl : * Carbaryl : * Carbofuran : * * Chlorpyrifos : P * * Cypermethrin : * Dimethoate : P Disulfoton : * * Ethyl parathion : P Lambda-cyhalothrin : P P * P P * Malathion : * * Methyl parathion : * * Permethrin : * Thiamethoxam : * Zeta-cypermethrin : P * * * * P * : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : P * * * * Copper hydroxide : * * Mancozeb : * Propiconazole : P P * P * Pyraclostrobin : P * * * * Tebuconazole : P * P Thiophanate-methyl : * Thiram : * * Trifloxystrobin : P * : Other Chemicals : Ethephon : * Metaldehyde : * --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Winter Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2004 (continued) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :----------------------------------- Active Ingredient : NE : OH : OK : OR : SD : TX : WA ----------------------------------------------------------------------- : Herbicides : 2,4-D : P P P P P P P 2,4-D, Dimeth. salt : * * P 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : P P P P P * P Acetamide : P Acetic acid (2,4-D) : P * * * * * * Acetochlor : Acifluorfen : * Alachlor : Atrazine : * * * Benefin : * Bromoxynil : P * P Bromoxynil octanoate : * P * Butoxy. ester 2,4-D : * P P * * * Carfentrazone-ethyl : * * * Chlorsulfuron : P P P * P Clodinafop-propargil : 1 * P Clopyralid : * * * Dicamba : P P P P * P Dicamba, Sodium salt : * Diclofop-methyl : P * Difenzoquat : * Diuron : * * Fenoxaprop : * * Flucarbazone-sodium : * * Fluroxypyr : * * * Fluroxypyr 1-methylh : * * * Glyphosate : P * P P P P P Glyphosate diam salt : * Halosulfuron : Imazamethabenz : * Imazamox : * * * P MCPA : 1 P P P MCPA, dimethyl. salt : P * MCPA, sodium salt : * Mesosulfuron-Methyl : * * Metribuzin : P * Metsulfuron-methyl : P P P P P P Oryzalin : * Paraquat : * Picloram : * * Prosulfuron : * P Quinclorac : * Sulfentrazone : Sulfosulfuron : * P P * P Thifensulfuron : P P P P * P Tralkoxydim : * Triallate : * Triasulfuron : P * P P * P Tribenuron-methyl : P P P P P P ----------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Winter Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2004 (continued) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :----------------------------------- Active Ingredient : NE : OH : OK : OR : SD : TX : WA ----------------------------------------------------------------------- : Insecticides : Azinphos-methyl : * Carbaryl : * Carbofuran : Chlorpyrifos : P * P Cypermethrin : * Dimethoate : * * * * Disulfoton : Ethyl parathion : * * Lambda-cyhalothrin : * * * * Malathion : * Methyl parathion : * * Permethrin : * Thiamethoxam : * Zeta-cypermethrin : P P : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : * * * Copper hydroxide : Mancozeb : * Propiconazole : * * * P * P Pyraclostrobin : * P * Tebuconazole : * * Thiophanate-methyl : * Thiram : Trifloxystrobin : * * * : Other Chemicals : Ethephon : * Metaldehyde : * ----------------------------------------------------------------------- P Usage data are published for this active ingredient. * Usage data are not published for this active ingredient. 1 Active ingredient used only as a spot treatment; rate per acre application number, total applied, and area applied not available Winter Wheat: Pesticide, Planted Acreage, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied Program States and Total, 2004 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Area Receiving and Total Applied State :Planted:---------------------------------------------------------------------- :Acreage: Herbicide : Insecticide : Fungicide : Other --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 : Acres lbs lbs lbs lbs : : CO 1/ : 2,300 54 908 ID 1/ : 750 94 380 1 2 IL 1/ : 920 35 41 9 11 KS 1/ :10,000 38 1,138 MI : 660 50 94 11 3 11 11 MO 1/ : 1,050 35 109 8 9 MT 1/ : 1,900 95 2,533 NE 1/ : 1,850 51 537 OH 1/ : 920 29 96 OK 1/ : 6,200 34 267 24 511 OR 1/ : 820 98 694 3 7 3 5 SD 1/ : 1,650 66 646 13 21 TX : 6,300 19 810 7 189 WA 1/ : 1,800 88 1,007 4 17 : Total1/ :37,120 45 9,260 7 745 2 98 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more pesticide classes. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 13 1.4 0.33 0.45 2,173 2,4-D, Dimeth. salt : 1 1.2 0.27 0.32 144 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 5 1.3 0.34 0.45 786 Acetamide : * 1.0 0.34 0.34 9 Acetic acid (2,4-D) : 1 1.1 0.29 0.32 145 Atrazine : 1 1.4 0.54 0.73 223 Bromoxynil : 2 1.0 0.27 0.28 154 Bromoxynil octanoate : 1 1.0 0.24 0.24 105 Butoxy. ester 2,4-D : 2 1.1 0.53 0.57 352 Carfentrazone-ethyl : * 1.0 0.03 0.03 1 Chlorsulfuron : 8 1.0 0.01 0.01 32 Clodinafop-propargil : 1 1.0 0.04 0.04 10 Clopyralid : 1 1.0 0.09 0.09 18 Dicamba : 6 1.2 0.10 0.12 269 Diclofop-methyl : * 1.0 0.67 0.67 89 Diuron : * 1.0 1.10 1.10 20 Fenoxaprop : * 1.0 0.08 0.08 3 Flucarbazone-sodium : * 1.0 0.02 0.02 1 Fluroxypyr : 1 1.0 0.09 0.09 30 Fluroxypyr 1-methylh : * 1.0 0.10 0.10 7 Glyphosate : 13 1.9 0.42 0.78 3,648 Imazamox : 1 1.0 0.03 0.03 9 MCPA : 4 1.1 0.32 0.37 498 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : * 1.0 0.53 0.53 60 Mesosulfuron-Methyl : * 1.0 0.01 0.01 1 Metribuzin : 1 1.7 0.27 0.46 135 Metsulfuron-methyl : 15 1.1 0.002 0.002 13 Picloram : 1 1.0 0.01 0.01 2 Prosulfuron : * 1.0 0.02 0.02 1 Sulfosulfuron : 4 1.0 0.03 0.03 33 Thifensulfuron : 9 1.1 0.008 0.009 29 Tralkoxydim : * 1.0 0.14 0.14 8 Triallate : * 1.0 1.08 1.08 85 Triasulfuron : 4 1.1 0.02 0.02 25 Tribenuron-methyl : 10 1.1 0.004 0.004 15 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 3 1.0 0.36 0.36 438 Dimethoate : * 1.0 0.31 0.31 21 Ethyl parathion : 1 1.0 0.63 0.63 133 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 1 1.0 0.02 0.02 6 Zeta-cypermethrin : 1 1.0 0.03 0.03 10 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : * 1.0 0.07 0.07 13 Propiconazole : 1 1.0 0.10 0.10 35 Pyraclostrobin : 1 1.1 0.09 0.10 22 Tebuconazole : 1 1.0 0.04 0.04 15 Trifloxystrobin : * 1.2 0.07 0.08 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Area applied is less than 0.5 percent. 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for the 14 Program States was 37.1 million acres. States included are CO, ID, IL, KS, MI, MO, MT, NE, OH, OK, OR, SD, TX, and WA. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Colorado, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 24 1.4 0.24 0.33 180 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 6 1.9 0.16 0.30 38 Atrazine : 6 1.2 0.58 0.71 103 Dicamba : 20 1.0 0.07 0.07 34 Glyphosate : 23 1.5 0.48 0.70 365 Metsulfuron-methyl : 17 1.3 0.002 0.003 1 Thifensulfuron : 14 1.4 0.002 0.003 1 Tribenuron-methyl : 14 1.4 0.001 0.002 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Colorado was 2.3 million acres. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Idaho, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 33 1.0 0.44 0.44 107 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 2 1.0 0.43 0.43 8 Acetic acid (2,4-D) : 3 1.0 0.50 0.50 12 Bromoxynil : 22 1.0 0.22 0.22 37 Bromoxynil octanoate : 5 1.0 0.33 0.33 13 Dicamba : 3 1.0 0.09 0.09 2 Fluroxypyr : 19 1.0 0.12 0.12 17 Glyphosate : 5 1.5 0.52 0.77 30 MCPA : 45 1.0 0.32 0.32 106 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 5 1.0 0.38 0.38 13 Metsulfuron-methyl : 7 1.0 0.003 0.003 2/ Thifensulfuron : 31 1.0 0.01 0.01 3 Tribenuron-methyl : 36 1.0 0.007 0.007 2 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 1 1.0 0.02 0.02 2/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Idaho was 750,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Illinois, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : Acetic acid (2,4-D) : 2 1.0 0.39 0.39 8 Thifensulfuron : 29 1.0 0.02 0.02 5 Tribenuron-methyl : 26 1.0 0.008 0.008 2 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 4 1.2 0.10 0.12 4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Illinois was 920,000 acres. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Kansas, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 4 1.0 0.45 0.45 197 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 5 1.9 0.23 0.43 197 Chlorsulfuron : 18 1.0 0.009 0.009 16 Dicamba : 5 1.0 0.05 0.05 25 Glyphosate : 8 1.7 0.43 0.74 572 Metsulfuron-methyl : 20 1.0 0.002 0.002 4 Sulfosulfuron : 3 1.0 0.01 0.01 3 Triasulfuron : 4 1.0 0.01 0.01 4 Tribenuron-methyl : 5 1.0 0.004 0.004 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Kansas was 10.0 million acres. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Michigan, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 12 1.0 0.42 0.42 34 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 5 1.0 0.52 0.52 16 Acetic acid (2,4-D) : 3 1.0 0.60 0.60 12 Glyphosate : 2 1.0 0.74 0.74 9 Thifensulfuron : 20 1.0 0.01 0.01 2 Tribenuron-methyl : 16 1.0 0.006 0.006 1 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 3 1.0 0.02 0.02 1 Zeta-cypermethrin : 8 1.0 0.04 0.04 2 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 4 1.0 0.08 0.08 2 Tebuconazole : 8 1.0 0.11 0.11 6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Michigan was 660,000 acres. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Missouri, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 5 1.0 0.52 0.52 28 Metribuzin : 7 1.0 0.54 0.54 41 Thifensulfuron : 23 1.0 0.01 0.01 4 Tribenuron-methyl : 23 1.0 0.007 0.007 2 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 8 1.1 0.02 0.02 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Missouri was 1.1 million acres. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Montana, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 67 2.1 0.29 0.60 761 2,4-D, Dimeth. salt : 10 1.3 0.24 0.32 64 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 3 1.0 0.42 0.42 22 Bromoxynil : 4 1.0 0.24 0.24 17 Butoxy. ester 2,4-D : 7 1.3 0.37 0.50 68 Clodinafop-propargil : 3 1.0 0.03 0.03 2 Dicamba : 21 1.4 0.08 0.10 41 Glyphosate : 75 2.8 0.36 1.00 1,423 MCPA : 7 1.0 0.25 0.25 34 Metsulfuron-methyl : 22 1.1 0.003 0.003 1 Thifensulfuron : 9 1.0 0.004 0.004 1 Triasulfuron : 12 1.4 0.01 0.02 4 Tribenuron-methyl : 10 1.0 0.002 0.002 2/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Montana was 1.9 million acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Nebraska, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 24 1.2 0.29 0.36 155 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 5 1.3 0.39 0.52 49 Acetic acid (2,4-D) : 2 1.0 0.23 0.23 7 Chlorsulfuron : 2 1.0 0.009 0.009 2/ Dicamba : 6 1.4 0.04 0.06 7 Glyphosate : 11 1.6 0.60 0.98 205 Metsulfuron-methyl : 9 1.0 0.003 0.003 2/ Thifensulfuron : 9 1.0 0.01 0.01 2 Triasulfuron : 16 1.0 0.01 0.01 4 Tribenuron-methyl : 10 1.0 0.006 0.006 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Nebraska was 1.9 million acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Ohio, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 5 1.0 0.56 0.56 28 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 4 1.0 0.71 0.71 24 Butoxy. ester 2,4-D : 4 1.0 0.50 0.50 20 Dicamba : 3 1.0 0.15 0.15 5 Thifensulfuron : 8 1.0 0.01 0.01 1 Tribenuron-methyl : 9 1.0 0.007 0.007 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Ohio was 920,000 acres. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Oklahoma, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 4 1.0 0.14 0.14 30 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 4 1.0 0.35 0.35 80 Chlorsulfuron : 17 1.0 0.01 0.01 12 Glyphosate : 3 1.2 0.39 0.47 101 Metsulfuron-methyl : 17 1.0 0.002 0.002 2 Sulfosulfuron : 11 1.0 0.03 0.03 21 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 14 1.0 0.32 0.32 286 Zeta-cypermethrin : 4 1.0 0.02 0.02 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Oklahoma was 6.2 million acres. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Oregon, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 38 1.0 0.36 0.38 117 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 11 1.0 0.53 0.53 50 Acetamide : 3 1.0 0.34 0.34 9 Bromoxynil : 5 1.1 0.19 0.20 8 Butoxy. ester 2,4-D : 5 1.0 0.63 0.63 24 Chlorsulfuron : 3 1.0 0.01 0.01 2/ Dicamba : 41 1.6 0.19 0.30 99 Diclofop-methyl : 1 1.0 0.96 0.96 8 Glyphosate : 28 1.1 0.32 0.37 85 MCPA : 26 1.9 0.34 0.65 139 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 4 1.0 0.45 0.45 15 Metribuzin : 18 2.4 0.23 0.56 85 Metsulfuron-methyl : 55 1.0 0.002 0.002 1 Sulfosulfuron : 9 1.2 0.02 0.03 2 Thifensulfuron : 58 1.0 0.006 0.006 3 Triasulfuron : 6 1.0 0.02 0.02 1 Tribenuron-methyl : 58 1.0 0.003 0.003 1 : Insecticides : Zeta-cypermethrin : 2 1.0 0.02 0.02 2/ : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 3 1.2 0.11 0.14 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Oregon was 820,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, South Dakota, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 16 1.5 0.31 0.48 125 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 10 1.0 0.52 0.52 88 Bromoxynil octanoate : 18 1.0 0.22 0.22 64 Dicamba : 7 1.6 0.13 0.21 23 Glyphosate : 19 1.6 0.45 0.75 228 MCPA : 20 1.0 0.24 0.24 77 Metsulfuron-methyl : 13 1.0 0.002 0.002 2/ Thifensulfuron : 14 1.2 0.008 0.009 2 Triasulfuron : 3 1.0 0.03 0.03 1 Tribenuron-methyl : 13 1.2 0.004 0.004 1 : Fungicides : Pyraclostrobin : 8 1.1 0.08 0.10 13 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for South Dakota was 1.7 million acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Texas, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 5 1.0 0.49 0.49 160 Glyphosate : 8 1.6 0.51 0.81 394 Metsulfuron-methyl : 7 1.4 0.002 0.003 1 Tribenuron-methyl : 4 1.6 0.002 0.003 1 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 5 1.0 0.44 0.44 134 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Texas was 6.3 million acres. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Washington, 2004 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 32 1.0 0.46 0.47 267 2,4-D, Dimeth. salt : 2 1.0 0.38 0.38 14 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 13 1.0 0.42 0.42 97 Bromoxynil : 13 1.0 0.32 0.32 75 Chlorsulfuron : 6 1.0 0.01 0.01 1 Clodinafop-propargil : 3 1.0 0.05 0.05 3 Dicamba : 8 1.0 0.15 0.15 22 Glyphosate : 21 1.2 0.44 0.52 200 Imazamox : 6 1.0 0.03 0.03 3 MCPA : 19 1.0 0.40 0.40 135 Metsulfuron-methyl : 30 1.0 0.002 0.002 1 Prosulfuron : 2 1.0 0.02 0.02 1 Sulfosulfuron : 12 1.1 0.03 0.03 6 Thifensulfuron : 32 1.0 0.008 0.008 5 Triasulfuron : 5 1.0 0.02 0.02 2 Tribenuron-methyl : 29 1.0 0.004 0.004 2 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 4 1.0 0.10 0.10 7 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2004 for Washington was 1.8 million acres. Agricultural Chemical Rate Per Crop Year - Highlights This report contains a new set of tables that were created to provide useful and relevant information on the distribution of rate data. The following tables show the 10th percentile, median, 90th percentile, mean and coefficient of variation (cv) distribution of the most commonly used active ingredients for each commodity at the program state level. The active ingredient needed to have been reported in the Program State on at least 30 reports, in order to be published in the following tables. The cv is a relative measure of the variability, expressed as a percentage of the estimate. For a specific commodity, the states have different agricultural practices which can lead to a wide range of pesticide rate uses. These ranges can lead to higher cv rates for different active ingredients. Some active ingredients are only applied in one manner resulting in smaller cv's, while other active ingredients have more varied agricultural uses which will have larger cv's. Please see the Survey and Estimation Procedures and Reliability sections for more information. Durum Wheat: Agricultural Chemicals Rate Per Crop Year Distribution, Program States, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Active Ingredient : 10th Percentile : Median : 90th Percentile : Mean : cv (%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 0.06 0.38 0.53 0.38 8 Clodinafop-propargil : 0.02 0.04 0.09 0.05 15 Dicamba : 0.03 0.06 0.25 0.09 14 Fenoxaprop : 0.04 0.05 0.08 0.06 14 Glyphosate : 0.28 0.38 0.75 0.45 7 MCPA : 0.17 0.25 0.50 0.30 9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Peanuts: Agricultural Chemicals Rate Per Crop Year Distribution, Program States, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Active Ingredient : 10th Percentile : Median : 90th Percentile : Mean : cv (%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : : Herbicides : 2,4-DB, Dimeth. salt : 0.13 0.25 0.75 0.34 7 3-Pyridinecarb. acid : 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 3 Acifluorfen : 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.32 9 Bentazon : 0.25 0.50 0.75 0.54 7 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 0.004 0.008 0.016 0.009 15 Clethodim : 0.11 0.14 0.25 0.19 11 Diclosulam : 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 3 Ethalfluralin : 0.56 0.75 0.75 0.70 2 Glyphosate : 0.56 0.75 1.22 0.80 7 Paraquat : 0.10 0.16 0.23 0.17 6 Pendimethalin : 0.50 0.83 1.00 0.81 3 Pyridinecarb. acid : 0.02 0.05 0.09 0.05 16 S-Metolachlor : 0.95 1.43 1.91 1.41 6 Sethoxydim : 0.07 0.19 0.38 0.23 20 Trifluralin : 0.50 0.55 1.00 0.68 14 : Insecticides : Acephate : 0.09 0.75 2.25 0.88 39 Aldicarb : 0.60 1.05 1.50 1.16 9 Chlorpyrifos : 0.90 1.95 2.10 1.85 11 Esfenvalerate : 0.02 0.03 0.08 0.05 27 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.03 7 Methomyl : 0.30 0.45 1.20 0.63 18 Phorate : 0.60 1.00 1.40 1.00 3 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 0.20 0.36 0.62 0.40 9 Chlorothalonil : 1.04 3.00 6.75 3.50 6 Propiconazole : 0.05 0.13 0.35 0.17 12 Pyraclostrobin : 0.15 0.24 0.49 0.29 9 Tebuconazole : 0.20 0.41 0.81 0.44 7 Trifloxystrobin : 0.06 0.13 0.34 0.16 11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Soybeans: Agricultural Chemicals Rate Per Crop Year Distribution, Program States, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Active Ingredient : 10th Percentile : Median : 90th Percentile : Mean : cv (%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 0.24 0.48 1.41 0.51 19 Acetic acid (2,4-D) : 0.24 0.48 0.96 0.47 9 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.02 5 Clethodim : 0.06 0.09 0.16 0.10 10 Cloransulam-methyl : 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.03 15 Fenoxaprop : 0.01 0.13 0.19 0.12 8 Fluazifop-P-butyl : 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.04 8 Flumioxazin : 0.05 0.06 0.10 0.07 4 Fomesafen : 0.09 0.24 0.35 0.23 6 Glyphosate : 0.56 0.94 1.62 1.08 1 Glyphosate diam salt : 0.66 0.75 1.50 0.91 6 Imazamox : 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 6 Imazethapyr : 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.05 6 Metribuzin : 0.08 0.23 0.38 0.24 6 Pendimethalin : 0.15 0.84 1.50 0.87 5 S-Metolachlor : 0.79 1.26 1.77 1.28 6 Sulfentrazone : 0.06 0.10 0.21 0.12 4 Sulfosate : 0.75 1.25 2.44 1.49 7 Trifluralin : 0.50 0.80 1.00 0.84 3 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 0.09 0.50 0.50 0.45 9 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.02 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemicals Rate Per Crop Year Distribution, Program States, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Active Ingredient : 10th Percentile : Median : 90th Percentile : Mean : cv (%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 0.15 0.34 0.75 0.39 7 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 0.18 0.35 0.71 0.41 11 Acetic acid (2,4-D) : 0.12 0.18 0.48 0.27 24 Bromoxynil : 0.19 0.25 0.31 0.24 4 Bromoxynil octanoate : 0.16 0.25 0.31 0.25 5 Clodinafop-propargil : 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.06 12 Clopyralid : 0.04 0.09 0.11 0.07 8 Dicamba : 0.03 0.06 0.13 0.09 9 Fenoxaprop : 0.04 0.06 0.09 0.06 4 Flucarbazone-sodium : 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 7 Fluroxypyr : 0.05 0.06 0.12 0.08 9 Fluroxypyr 1-methylh : 0.08 0.09 0.13 0.09 6 Glyphosate : 0.26 0.38 0.93 0.49 8 MCPA : 0.19 0.25 0.43 0.29 3 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 0.25 0.38 0.75 0.42 11 Metsulfuron-methyl : 0.001 0.003 0.004 0.003 9 Thifensulfuron : 0.003 0.010 0.016 0.009 5 Tribenuron-methyl : 0.001 0.005 0.009 0.006 22 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 0.03 0.06 0.11 0.07 18 Tebuconazole : 0.06 0.11 0.11 0.10 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemicals Rate Per Crop Year Distribution, Program States, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Active Ingredient : 10th Percentile : Median : 90th Percentile : Mean : cv (%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 0.12 0.36 1.01 0.45 8 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt : 0.12 0.47 0.71 0.45 9 Acetic acid : 0.09 0.33 0.49 0.32 11 Bromoxynil : 0.13 0.25 0.40 0.28 9 Bromoxynil octanoate : 0.16 0.23 0.39 0.24 10 Butoxy. ester 2,4-D : 0.17 0.68 0.84 0.57 13 Chlorsulfuron : 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 7 Dicamba : 0.01 0.09 0.24 0.12 15 Glyphosate : 0.23 0.66 1.50 0.78 6 MCPA : 0.17 0.25 0.53 0.37 13 Metribuzin : 0.09 0.28 1.13 0.46 36 Metsulfuron-methyl : 0.001 0.002 0.004 0.002 6 Sulfosulfuron : 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.03 12 Thifensulfuron : 0.002 0.012 0.019 0.009 8 Triasulfuron : 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.02 9 Tribenuron-methyl : 0.001 0.006 0.009 0.004 8 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 7 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 0.03 0.11 0.11 0.10 8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pest Management Practices - Highlights The pest management questions were enhanced in 2003 to provide more relevant data on agricultural practices. The 2004 surveys continued using these modified questions. These questions more accurately capture current pest management practices for the specific crops. Some questions remained unchanged, so if the reader would like to do a year to year comparison, their results would still be valid. Durum wheat, soybeans, and other spring wheat were last asked about their pest management practices in 2002. Winter wheat was also surveyed in 2002, but the data available come from acres harvested, rather than acres planted. Peanuts were last surveyed in 1999. Questions pertaining to scouting have changed between 2002 and 2004. Scouting is now classified as either scouting by general observation or scouting deliberately. Tillage practices is now a separate question from information regarding field edge, roadway and fence line maintenance. Durum Wheat: Producers reported a high percentage of farms (94 percent) scouted for pests in durum wheat. Of the producers who scouted for pests, 90 percent checked their crops for weeds, 65 percent for insects/mites, and 63 percent for diseases. Scouting was done predominantly (99-100 percent) by the operator, partner, or a family member. No-till/minimum till farming practices (47 percent) and rotating crops to control for pests (41 percent) were two additional farming practices commonly used to control pests. Peanuts: Of the producers sampled, 99 percent scouted for pests. Of these, 98 percent scouted for weeds, insects/mites, and diseases. To avoid pest infestations, 77 percent of the producers rotated their crops and 71 percent monitored weather to protect against pest infestations. Soybeans: Scouting was the most prevalent form of pest management practice for soybeans, with 92 percent of those surveyed scouting through general observation, or deliberate scouting activities. Of those who completed scouting activities, 91 percent were monitoring for weeds, 77 percent for insects/mites, and 71 percent for diseases. To avoid pest pressures, 79 percent of growers rotated their crops. To manage pest pressures, 55 percent of those surveyed used no-till/minimum till, while 43 percent maintained field edges, lanes, ditches, roadways, or fence lines as a prevention practice. Other Spring Wheat: Of other spring wheat producers, 65 percent deliberately scouted for pests, while 27 percent scouted by general observation. Of those who scouted, 92 percent monitored for weeds, 56 percent for insects/mites, and 64 percent for diseases. To prevent pest infestations, 63 percent of producers rotated their crops to avoid diseases, 35 percent used no-till/minimum till practices, and 33 percent alternated pesticides with different mechanisms of action to suppress pest infestations. Winter Wheat: Of winter wheat producers, 78 percent scouted their fields for pests, with 29 percent using deliberate scouting activities. Of those producers who scouted, 75 percent were looking for weeds, 62 percent for insects/mites, and 58 percent for diseases. To avoid pest infestations, 35 percent of farmers rotated their crops to control for pests, while 34 percent of producers cleaned implements after working in the field as a prevention practice. Maintaining field edges, lanes, ditches, roadways, or fence lines was used as a prevention practice by 34 percent of farmers. To suppress pests, 24 percent of producers maintained ground cover/physical barriers. Pest Management Practices, Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice, Durum Wheat, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States : Program Practice :-------------------: : MT : ND : States -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Farms : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 56 44 47 Remove or plow down crop residue : 12 15 14 Clean implements after fieldwork : 49 37 39 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 3 10 9 Water management practices : * * : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 6 6 6 Rotate crops to control pests : 9 50 41 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 3 10 8 Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 9 12 11 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 44 46 46 Deliberate scouting activites : 55 46 48 Field was not scouted : 1 7 6 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 19 1 5 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 5 1 Scouting due to pest development model : 3 1 2 Scouted for weeds : 81 93 90 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 100 100 100 An employee : * * Farm supply or chemical dealer : Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : * * Scouted for insects amd mites : 68 64 65 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 99 99 99 An employee : 1 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 1 1 Scouted for diseases : 45 68 63 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 99 99 99 An employee : 1 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 1 1 Records kept to track pests : 6 6 6 Field mapping of weed problem : 3 * 1 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 2 * Weather monitoring : 51 37 40 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : Scouting used to make decisions : 8 8 8 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 46 21 26 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 13 23 21 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Acres Receiving Practice, Durum Wheat, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States : Program Practice :-------------------: : MT : ND : States -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Acres : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 81 57 63 Remove or plow down crop residue : 14 11 12 Clean implements after fieldwork : 48 45 46 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 5 15 12 Water management practices : * * : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 17 6 9 Rotate crops to control pests : 19 57 48 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 3 11 9 Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 17 13 14 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 37 55 51 Deliberate scouting activites : 62 38 44 Field was not scouted : 1 7 5 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 22 3 8 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 8 2 Scouting due to pest development model : 2 1 1 Scouted for weeds : 98 93 95 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 99 99 99 An employee : 1 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 1 1 Scouted for insects amd mites : 65 71 70 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 99 99 99 An employee : 1 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 1 1 Scouted for diseases : 55 69 66 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 99 99 99 An employee : 1 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 1 1 Records kept to track pests : 12 9 10 Field mapping of weed problem : 1 2 2 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 4 1 Weather monitoring : 49 37 40 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : Scouting used to make decisions : 12 3 5 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 30 20 23 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 26 30 29 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice, Peanuts, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States Practice :------------------------------- : AL : FL : GA -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Farms : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 10 40 22 Remove or plow down crop residue : 52 70 60 Clean implements after fieldwork : 35 53 53 Field cultivated for weed control : 35 25 25 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 63 35 73 Water management practices : * 6 : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 9 23 25 Rotate crops to control pests : 68 66 75 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 4 5 16 Growing trap crop to control insects : * Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 37 31 40 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 42 34 48 Deliberate scouting activites : 58 66 52 Field was not scouted : * Established scouting process/insect trap used : 14 27 31 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 4 1 8 Scouting due to pest development model : 5 5 Scouted for weeds : 100 100 98 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 94 96 77 An employee : 2 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 2 2 2 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 3 2 21 Scouted for insects amd mites : 100 99 100 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 94 96 77 An employee : 2 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 2 2 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 3 2 21 Scouted for diseases : 100 100 99 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 94 96 77 An employee : 2 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 2 2 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 3 2 21 Records kept to track pests : 18 36 20 Field mapping of weed problem : 1 2 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 2 5 10 Weather monitoring : 69 92 74 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : 2 1 1 Beneficial organisms : * * Scouting used to make decisions : 12 9 27 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 43 24 33 Adjust planting methods : 7 19 38 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 34 26 26 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice, Peanuts, 2004 (continued) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States : Program Practice :-------------------: : NC : TX : States -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Farms : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 13 12 19 Remove or plow down crop residue : 51 58 58 Clean implements after fieldwork : 38 52 47 Field cultivated for weed control : 31 77 31 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 56 69 64 Water management practices : 12 4 : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 13 12 19 Rotate crops to control pests : 91 78 77 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 15 11 12 Growing trap crop to control insects : 1 * Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 41 19 37 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 47 59 46 Deliberate scouting activites : 51 38 53 Field was not scouted : 2 3 1 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 20 8 24 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 11 7 7 Scouting due to pest development model : 7 9 5 Scouted for weeds : 98 90 98 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 85 88 84 An employee : 2 1 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 13 10 14 Scouted for insects amd mites : 95 91 98 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 81 85 83 An employee : 2 1 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 17 13 15 Scouted for diseases : 96 89 98 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 81 85 83 An employee : 2 1 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : * 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 17 13 15 Records kept to track pests : 9 20 19 Field mapping of weed problem : 10 * 3 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 3 1 6 Weather monitoring : 69 33 71 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : 4 2 Beneficial organisms : 4 * 1 Scouting used to make decisions : 12 9 19 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 32 30 33 Adjust planting methods : 13 4 23 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 37 4 28 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Acres Receiving Practice, Peanuts, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States Practice :------------------------------- : AL : FL : GA -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Acres : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 8 45 24 Remove or plow down crop residue : 40 70 56 Clean implements after fieldwork : 47 50 54 Field cultivated for weed control : 28 27 19 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 65 37 73 Water management practices : 2 11 : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 11 29 29 Rotate crops to control pests : 59 61 73 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 6 10 14 Growing trap crop to control insects : * Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 35 33 42 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 48 21 46 Deliberate scouting activites : 52 79 54 Field was not scouted : * Established scouting process/insect trap used : 21 38 29 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 3 3 13 Scouting due to pest development model : 5 13 Scouted for weeds : 99 100 99 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 90 92 74 An employee : 4 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 4 * Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 5 4 24 Scouted for insects amd mites : 100 100 100 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 90 92 74 An employee : 4 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 4 * Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 5 4 24 Scouted for diseases : 99 100 99 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 90 92 74 An employee : 4 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 4 * Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 5 4 24 Records kept to track pests : 24 47 21 Field mapping of weed problem : 2 5 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 2 13 11 Weather monitoring : 70 91 68 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : 4 1 3 Beneficial organisms : * 2 Scouting used to make decisions : 13 13 27 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 32 28 26 Adjust planting methods : 8 23 31 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 39 26 30 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Acres Receiving Practice, Peanuts, 2004 (continued) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States : Program Practice :-------------------: : NC : TX : States -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Acres : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 11 18 22 Remove or plow down crop residue : 50 55 54 Clean implements after fieldwork : 40 67 54 Field cultivated for weed control : 26 85 34 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 48 75 66 Water management practices : 17 9 : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 16 11 22 Rotate crops to control pests : 87 73 71 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 15 9 11 Growing trap crop to control insects : 2 * Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 39 15 35 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 41 56 45 Deliberate scouting activites : 57 43 55 Field was not scouted : 2 1 * Established scouting process/insect trap used : 27 12 25 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 14 7 9 Scouting due to pest development model : 9 8 9 Scouted for weeds : 98 86 96 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 79 83 80 An employee : 2 3 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 19 15 17 Scouted for insects amd mites : 93 90 98 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 75 81 80 An employee : 2 2 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 22 17 17 Scouted for diseases : 96 85 96 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 76 79 79 An employee : 2 3 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : * 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 22 18 18 Records kept to track pests : 16 25 25 Field mapping of weed problem : 13 * 4 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 2 1 7 Weather monitoring : 75 34 65 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : 8 3 Beneficial organisms : 2 * * Scouting used to make decisions : 19 13 20 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 36 42 31 Adjust planting methods : 17 4 21 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 47 3 27 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice, Soybeans, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States Practice :------------------------------- : AR : IL : IN : IA -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Farms : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 41 51 59 56 Remove or plow down crop residue : 44 10 9 16 Clean implements after fieldwork : 26 27 16 27 Field cultivated for weed control : 10 5 3 10 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 36 53 46 38 Water management practices : 10 * : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 6 8 3 5 Rotate crops to control pests : 41 75 78 75 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 5 14 5 17 Growing trap crop to control insects : 1 Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 37 40 36 50 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 49 50 43 37 Deliberate scouting activites : 33 45 45 53 Field was not scouted : 18 5 12 10 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 9 23 12 14 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 6 4 5 14 Scouting due to pest development model : 5 6 7 9 Scouted for weeds : 81 95 88 85 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 81 85 90 87 An employee : * 1 * * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 7 12 5 11 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 13 2 4 2 Scouted for insects amd mites : 71 79 61 80 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 82 85 88 86 An employee : * 1 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 8 11 6 12 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 10 3 5 2 Scouted for diseases : 68 79 62 62 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 82 85 88 86 An employee : * 1 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 7 11 6 11 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 11 3 5 3 Records kept to track pests : 14 25 11 7 Field mapping of weed problem : 4 13 5 7 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 1 2 3 2 Weather monitoring : 48 75 53 61 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : 3 * * 2 Scouting used to make decisions : 29 35 17 30 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 9 26 21 30 Adjust planting methods : 8 33 12 19 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 5 19 17 15 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice, Soybeans, 2004 (continued) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States Practice :------------------------------- : KS : MN : MO : NE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Farms : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 61 32 59 70 Remove or plow down crop residue : 10 19 21 12 Clean implements after fieldwork : 42 51 26 22 Field cultivated for weed control : 5 15 1 20 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 33 29 56 47 Water management practices : 5 * 12 : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 16 2 5 3 Rotate crops to control pests : 87 86 74 95 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 12 10 12 14 Growing trap crop to control insects : 3 1 1 Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 39 33 39 57 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 56 38 48 36 Deliberate scouting activites : 41 58 40 58 Field was not scouted : 2 4 12 6 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 12 17 7 14 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 3 16 6 20 Scouting due to pest development model : 4 7 2 8 Scouted for weeds : 98 96 88 91 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 90 88 94 80 An employee : 1 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : * 7 3 6 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 9 5 3 13 Scouted for insects amd mites : 62 85 65 88 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 85 88 95 77 An employee : 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 6 3 9 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 14 5 2 14 Scouted for diseases : 58 82 63 69 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 85 89 96 75 An employee : 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 6 2 7 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 14 5 2 18 Records kept to track pests : 11 12 7 12 Field mapping of weed problem : 3 5 5 11 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 2 4 6 11 Weather monitoring : 68 69 47 51 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : 3 * * 5 Scouting used to make decisions : 13 19 11 36 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 33 24 23 43 Adjust planting methods : 14 13 28 15 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 19 16 12 18 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice, Soybeans, 2004 (continued) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States :Program Practice :-----------------------: : ND : OH : SD :States -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Farms : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 45 69 64 55 Remove or plow down crop residue : 28 18 23 17 Clean implements after fieldwork : 40 26 31 29 Field cultivated for weed control : 10 1 9 7 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 54 42 17 43 Water management practices : 2 : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 7 * 6 5 Rotate crops to control pests : 81 90 87 79 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 30 4 16 12 Growing trap crop to control insects : * Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 38 34 34 40 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 22 64 36 45 Deliberate scouting activites : 64 31 59 47 Field was not scouted : 14 5 5 8 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 17 10 24 15 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 16 5 15 9 Scouting due to pest development model : 10 5 5 6 Scouted for weeds : 86 95 95 91 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 79 86 72 86 An employee : * * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 3 13 11 8 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 19 1 17 5 Scouted for insects amd mites : 70 86 90 77 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 75 85 70 85 An employee : 1 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 3 13 13 9 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 22 1 17 6 Scouted for diseases : 68 78 78 71 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 75 84 67 85 An employee : 1 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 3 15 13 9 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 22 1 20 6 Records kept to track pests : 25 13 24 14 Field mapping of weed problem : 3 6 12 7 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 2 2 6 3 Weather monitoring : 65 52 59 60 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : * 1 Scouting used to make decisions : 27 19 37 25 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 33 16 30 25 Adjust planting methods : 19 9 19 19 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 6 18 7 15 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Acres Receiving Practice, Soybeans, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States Practice :------------------------------- : AR : IL : IN : IA -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Acres : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 40 54 59 59 Remove or plow down crop residue : 41 15 11 16 Clean implements after fieldwork : 23 28 19 26 Field cultivated for weed control : 9 9 2 10 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 41 60 46 40 Water management practices : 14 1 : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 7 9 1 6 Rotate crops to control pests : 49 75 78 78 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 6 13 6 16 Growing trap crop to control insects : 2 Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 35 46 37 56 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 55 47 42 33 Deliberate scouting activites : 33 49 48 57 Field was not scouted : 12 4 10 9 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 7 23 11 18 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 4 6 5 18 Scouting due to pest development model : 5 9 7 10 Scouted for weeds : 86 96 90 86 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 85 87 87 83 An employee : * 2 1 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 4 9 8 13 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 11 2 4 4 Scouted for insects amd mites : 79 87 66 83 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 87 88 87 82 An employee : * 2 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 4 8 8 14 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 9 3 5 4 Scouted for diseases : 76 86 66 71 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 87 88 87 81 An employee : * 2 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 4 8 8 12 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 9 2 5 5 Records kept to track pests : 19 24 11 11 Field mapping of weed problem : 2 14 6 11 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 2 4 3 3 Weather monitoring : 45 81 50 68 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : 1 1 1 1 Scouting used to make decisions : 31 38 18 33 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 9 25 19 27 Adjust planting methods : 9 28 10 24 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 3 20 16 13 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Acres Receiving Practice, Soybeans, 2004 (continued) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States Practice :------------------------------- : KS : MN : MO : NE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Acres : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 64 33 60 68 Remove or plow down crop residue : 10 20 18 13 Clean implements after fieldwork : 38 47 21 27 Field cultivated for weed control : 5 16 2 22 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 33 36 50 49 Water management practices : 10 1 17 : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 12 4 5 2 Rotate crops to control pests : 90 91 71 92 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 13 8 9 14 Growing trap crop to control insects : 2 1 2 Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 41 35 38 54 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 52 31 43 38 Deliberate scouting activites : 47 62 42 55 Field was not scouted : 1 8 15 7 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 18 19 8 20 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 5 10 7 21 Scouting due to pest development model : 5 9 3 9 Scouted for weeds : 99 91 85 91 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 81 82 89 77 An employee : 2 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 8 7 8 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 16 10 4 15 Scouted for insects amd mites : 65 84 63 87 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 73 83 90 73 An employee : 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 2 6 6 11 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 24 11 4 16 Scouted for diseases : 56 76 60 68 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 69 83 91 71 An employee : 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 2 5 5 9 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 27 12 4 20 Records kept to track pests : 16 17 10 11 Field mapping of weed problem : 8 8 6 9 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 3 5 4 8 Weather monitoring : 70 72 49 50 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : 4 1 1 7 Scouting used to make decisions : 19 23 12 37 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 37 26 27 44 Adjust planting methods : 16 11 23 19 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 24 19 13 17 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Acres Receiving Practice, Soybeans, 2004 (continued) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States :Program Practice :-----------------------: : ND : OH : SD :States -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Acres : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 55 69 65 56 Remove or plow down crop residue : 19 13 17 17 Clean implements after fieldwork : 39 26 27 29 Field cultivated for weed control : 10 1 4 9 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 55 45 15 44 Water management practices : 3 : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 4 1 4 5 Rotate crops to control pests : 86 89 84 80 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 28 3 15 12 Growing trap crop to control insects : * Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 30 32 30 42 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 24 63 38 41 Deliberate scouting activites : 70 31 59 52 Field was not scouted : 6 6 4 8 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 15 9 22 16 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 11 7 13 11 Scouting due to pest development model : 8 5 5 8 Scouted for weeds : 94 93 96 91 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 83 87 70 83 An employee : 1 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 4 10 13 8 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 13 1 17 7 Scouted for insects amd mites : 73 83 91 80 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 80 87 68 82 An employee : 2 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 4 11 14 9 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 16 1 18 8 Scouted for diseases : 68 76 78 73 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 80 86 65 82 An employee : 2 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 4 12 14 8 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 16 1 21 9 Records kept to track pests : 23 10 25 16 Field mapping of weed problem : 4 8 11 9 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 2 2 4 4 Weather monitoring : 69 51 52 63 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : 1 1 Scouting used to make decisions : 24 18 37 28 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 27 16 32 26 Adjust planting methods : 20 12 18 19 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 7 20 6 15 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice, Other Spring Wheat, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States Practice :------------------------------- : ID : MN : MT : ND -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Farms : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 16 15 36 30 Remove or plow down crop residue : 26 19 35 25 Clean implements after fieldwork : 25 31 25 63 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 28 35 11 38 Water management practices : 8 * : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 7 5 5 13 Rotate crops to control pests : 48 79 22 76 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 2 11 3 10 Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 11 28 15 21 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 40 13 37 24 Deliberate scouting activites : 55 78 37 75 Field was not scouted : 5 9 25 1 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 10 36 2 9 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 1 7 * 3 Scouting due to pest development model : 1 8 1 4 Scouted for weeds : 95 91 74 99 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 70 67 98 77 An employee : 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 23 14 2 5 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 6 19 18 Scouted for insects amd mites : 48 79 42 51 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 84 63 100 63 An employee : 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 9 15 3 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 3 21 34 Scouted for diseases : 43 78 38 69 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 77 63 97 71 An employee : 4 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 16 16 3 2 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 3 22 26 Records kept to track pests : 13 42 10 18 Field mapping of weed problem : 1 12 4 5 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 5 1 Weather monitoring : 33 62 27 57 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : 2 Scouting used to make decisions : 6 25 4 24 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 13 19 21 29 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 13 22 24 47 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice, Other Spring Wheat, 2004 (continued) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States :Program Practice :-----------------------: : OR : SD : WA :States -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Farms : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 26 66 26 35 Remove or plow down crop residue : 26 10 19 23 Clean implements after fieldwork : 46 37 51 45 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 32 19 27 28 Water management practices : 20 3 1 : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 4 2 19 8 Rotate crops to control pests : 28 77 54 63 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 2 15 5 9 Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 12 11 38 19 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 28 32 12 27 Deliberate scouting activites : 65 63 87 65 Field was not scouted : 7 5 1 8 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 12 32 34 16 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 5 3 4 3 Scouting due to pest development model : 9 1 2 3 Scouted for weeds : 89 95 99 92 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 70 71 83 78 An employee : 6 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 23 18 17 9 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : * 11 1 13 Scouted for insects amd mites : 82 66 75 56 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 78 59 88 70 An employee : 5 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 17 25 12 10 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 16 20 Scouted for diseases : 76 71 88 64 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 76 61 81 72 An employee : 5 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 19 24 19 10 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 15 18 Records kept to track pests : 27 24 13 20 Field mapping of weed problem : 11 14 5 7 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 4 5 4 1 Weather monitoring : 77 60 73 52 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : * * 1 Scouting used to make decisions : 11 29 19 20 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 11 32 31 26 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 23 16 47 33 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Acres Receiving Practice, Other Spring Wheat, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States Practice :------------------------------- : ID : MN : MT : ND -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Acres : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 22 13 55 33 Remove or plow down crop residue : 34 21 28 21 Clean implements after fieldwork : 38 34 45 67 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 26 45 20 45 Water management practices : 11 * : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 5 5 25 11 Rotate crops to control pests : 53 84 19 83 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 6 16 3 18 Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 17 32 24 32 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 45 7 23 13 Deliberate scouting activites : 53 86 69 85 Field was not scouted : 2 7 8 2 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 12 41 24 17 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 1 7 1 7 Scouting due to pest development model : 3 10 1 5 Scouted for weeds : 98 93 92 98 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 79 59 98 70 An employee : 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 15 18 2 6 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 4 22 24 Scouted for insects amd mites : 57 82 45 63 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 82 55 100 60 An employee : 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 11 20 6 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 4 24 34 Scouted for diseases : 58 80 58 73 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 80 55 97 63 An employee : 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 13 21 3 5 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 3 25 32 Records kept to track pests : 19 51 37 23 Field mapping of weed problem : 4 21 10 8 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 7 1 Weather monitoring : 39 63 56 71 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : 4 Scouting used to make decisions : 11 29 4 34 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 23 19 23 38 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 20 24 37 50 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Acres Receiving Practice, Other Spring Wheat, 2004 (continued) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States :Program Practice :-----------------------: : OR : SD : WA :States -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Acres : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 37 70 36 40 Remove or plow down crop residue : 21 6 20 21 Clean implements after fieldwork : 69 27 48 52 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 29 17 22 34 Water management practices : 10 4 1 : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 9 8 17 13 Rotate crops to control pests : 20 82 56 66 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 2 11 8 13 Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 6 10 35 27 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 43 33 20 19 Deliberate scouting activites : 54 60 77 77 Field was not scouted : 4 8 4 4 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 10 17 14 21 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 3 7 6 5 Scouting due to pest development model : 2 1 2 4 Scouted for weeds : 96 92 96 95 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 72 74 83 76 An employee : 7 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 20 10 15 8 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : * 16 2 16 Scouted for insects amd mites : 78 62 76 62 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 71 63 81 68 An employee : 7 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 21 14 19 9 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 24 23 Scouted for diseases : 77 69 84 70 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 71 65 82 70 An employee : 8 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 21 14 18 9 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 21 21 Records kept to track pests : 14 21 25 29 Field mapping of weed problem : 8 10 9 10 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 7 3 4 1 Weather monitoring : 81 55 61 63 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : * * 2 Scouting used to make decisions : 10 17 20 23 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 11 34 28 31 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 23 18 39 38 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice, Winter Wheat, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States Practice :------------------------------- : CO : ID : IL : KS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Farms : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 27 25 48 25 Remove or plow down crop residue : 26 20 7 37 Clean implements after fieldwork : 44 25 22 44 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 31 38 51 45 Water management practices : 7 : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 7 6 27 15 Rotate crops to control pests : 20 66 85 32 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 1 8 18 9 Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 13 27 24 25 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 50 45 43 69 Deliberate scouting activites : 40 42 37 12 Field was not scouted : 10 13 20 19 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 1 3 13 * Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 3 14 3 Scouting due to pest development model : 5 6 * Scouted for weeds : 88 87 67 81 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 74 79 94 94 An employee : 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 25 19 3 3 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 1 1 3 3 Scouted for insects amd mites : 59 57 58 55 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 80 78 92 93 An employee : 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 18 19 4 2 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 2 2 4 5 Scouted for diseases : 52 72 63 54 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 77 76 89 93 An employee : 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 20 20 8 2 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 3 3 3 5 Records kept to track pests : 14 16 11 5 Field mapping of weed problem : 12 4 7 * Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 6 * Weather monitoring : 5 43 23 13 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : Scouting used to make decisions : 1 13 17 4 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 37 34 17 26 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 1 31 7 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice, Winter Wheat, 2004 (continued) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States Practice :------------------------------- : MI : MO : MT : NE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Farms : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 47 33 73 29 Remove or plow down crop residue : 19 15 28 29 Clean implements after fieldwork : 35 22 40 19 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 35 33 20 35 Water management practices : * * 4 : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 20 10 24 25 Rotate crops to control pests : 79 70 9 44 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 5 5 8 7 Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 24 14 42 16 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 29 54 37 58 Deliberate scouting activites : 49 18 60 17 Field was not scouted : 22 28 3 25 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 12 2 2 3 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 14 1 * 1 Scouting due to pest development model : 4 1 2 2 Scouted for weeds : 73 72 97 74 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 82 91 90 92 An employee : 5 6 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 12 2 10 7 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 1 2 1 Scouted for insects amd mites : 51 52 91 52 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 75 87 90 91 An employee : 7 8 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 12 2 10 8 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 6 3 1 Scouted for diseases : 58 55 71 47 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 73 88 100 89 An employee : 6 7 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 19 2 * 9 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 2 3 2 Records kept to track pests : 14 10 20 10 Field mapping of weed problem : 5 7 2 13 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 3 3 * Weather monitoring : 31 12 48 16 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : * Scouting used to make decisions : 24 10 4 11 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 16 24 24 47 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 2 19 8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice, Winter Wheat, 2004 (continued) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States Practice :------------------------------- : OH : OK : OR : SD -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Farms : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 67 5 20 60 Remove or plow down crop residue : 21 33 46 24 Clean implements after fieldwork : 26 46 54 29 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 44 27 39 15 Water management practices : 7 : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 30 6 8 16 Rotate crops to control pests : 76 6 26 66 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 4 1 * 8 Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 12 3 36 21 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 43 45 34 45 Deliberate scouting activites : 28 28 62 44 Field was not scouted : 29 27 4 11 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 4 4 17 9 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 6 9 5 2 Scouting due to pest development model : 1 3 9 2 Scouted for weeds : 70 65 88 89 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 92 94 63 85 An employee : * 3 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 8 5 34 6 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : * 1 8 Scouted for insects amd mites : 64 72 73 60 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 91 95 68 82 An employee : 3 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 9 5 29 7 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 1 11 Scouted for diseases : 66 60 64 64 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 91 95 72 82 An employee : 4 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 9 5 24 7 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 1 11 Records kept to track pests : 5 3 24 18 Field mapping of weed problem : 2 3 1 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : * 3 3 1 Weather monitoring : 10 15 63 26 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : 2 Scouting used to make decisions : 11 8 19 8 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 15 9 44 38 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 4 6 39 12 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice, Winter Wheat, 2004 (continued) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States : Program Practice :-------------------: : TX : WA : States -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Farms : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 11 23 28 Remove or plow down crop residue : 37 66 30 Clean implements after fieldwork : 26 49 34 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 28 41 34 Water management practices : 3 5 1 : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 13 19 15 Rotate crops to control pests : 19 31 35 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 2 20 5 Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 23 34 20 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 41 35 49 Deliberate scouting activites : 28 64 29 Field was not scouted : 31 1 22 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 9 14 5 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 1 1 4 Scouting due to pest development model : 11 6 4 Scouted for weeds : 65 99 75 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 98 75 91 An employee : 1 4 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 21 7 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 2 Scouted for insects amd mites : 64 69 62 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 99 74 91 An employee : 5 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 20 6 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 2 Scouted for diseases : 54 80 58 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 99 68 91 An employee : 5 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 27 6 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 2 Records kept to track pests : * 24 7 Field mapping of weed problem : * 9 3 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 1 3 1 Weather monitoring : 5 73 16 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : 1 8 * Scouting used to make decisions : 1 17 7 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 19 33 24 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 9 42 7 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Acres Receiving Practice, Winter Wheat, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States Practice :------------------------------- : CO : ID : IL : KS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Acres : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 41 33 57 22 Remove or plow down crop residue : 28 18 6 30 Clean implements after fieldwork : 55 32 25 41 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 36 24 52 48 Water management practices : 4 : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 20 6 27 15 Rotate crops to control pests : 25 66 85 28 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 3 5 17 7 Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 14 37 29 24 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 73 44 41 59 Deliberate scouting activites : 20 44 38 17 Field was not scouted : 7 12 21 24 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 1 2 17 * Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 2 10 6 Scouting due to pest development model : 1 9 * Scouted for weeds : 92 88 70 76 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 89 77 90 90 An employee : * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 8 23 2 4 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 3 * 9 6 Scouted for insects amd mites : 55 46 59 57 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 92 87 87 89 An employee : 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 3 12 2 3 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 5 1 10 8 Scouted for diseases : 41 71 61 53 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 90 73 84 88 An employee : 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 3 24 6 3 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 7 3 10 8 Records kept to track pests : 5 20 11 8 Field mapping of weed problem : 5 7 9 1 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 10 * Weather monitoring : 9 35 24 15 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : Scouting used to make decisions : 1 8 18 5 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 44 40 20 22 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 1 27 7 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Acres Receiving Practice, Winter Wheat, 2004 (continued) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States Practice :------------------------------- : MI : MO : MT : NE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Acres : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 49 42 76 44 Remove or plow down crop residue : 13 15 17 26 Clean implements after fieldwork : 40 23 37 26 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 40 42 21 24 Water management practices : * * 2 : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 27 12 24 15 Rotate crops to control pests : 85 67 15 51 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 6 2 8 7 Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 26 26 46 21 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 24 57 34 57 Deliberate scouting activites : 58 20 62 23 Field was not scouted : 18 23 4 20 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 15 3 4 7 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 18 1 1 1 Scouting due to pest development model : 4 2 1 2 Scouted for weeds : 76 76 95 80 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 78 91 99 95 An employee : 2 4 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 18 2 1 5 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 2 3 * Scouted for insects amd mites : 57 64 89 52 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 71 90 99 95 An employee : 3 4 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 18 3 1 5 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 7 4 1 Scouted for diseases : 61 67 75 51 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 70 89 100 92 An employee : 3 4 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 24 3 * 5 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 4 4 3 Records kept to track pests : 23 13 17 15 Field mapping of weed problem : 6 5 3 16 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 3 4 2 Weather monitoring : 30 18 32 22 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : * Scouting used to make decisions : 34 11 5 16 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 20 23 29 49 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 4 11 12 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Acres Receiving Practice, Winter Wheat, 2004 (continued) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States Practice :------------------------------- : OH : OK : OR : SD -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Acres : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 62 10 33 62 Remove or plow down crop residue : 16 33 48 22 Clean implements after fieldwork : 28 56 61 34 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 40 36 30 20 Water management practices : 3 : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 31 8 18 15 Rotate crops to control pests : 79 2 8 67 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 5 1 1 15 Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 16 6 59 26 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 41 39 21 35 Deliberate scouting activites : 27 34 78 53 Field was not scouted : 32 27 2 12 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 5 8 13 14 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 9 7 2 2 Scouting due to pest development model : 3 6 3 1 Scouted for weeds : 68 61 96 88 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 87 88 68 79 An employee : * 2 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 12 10 30 9 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : * 2 12 Scouted for insects amd mites : 60 72 66 62 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 87 90 64 74 An employee : 1 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 13 9 35 10 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 1 15 Scouted for diseases : 64 58 66 66 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 88 88 67 74 An employee : 2 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 12 10 32 10 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 2 16 Records kept to track pests : 6 7 25 25 Field mapping of weed problem : 1 7 1 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 1 5 10 3 Weather monitoring : 13 16 46 27 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : 1 Scouting used to make decisions : 13 11 25 10 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 14 9 51 48 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 4 11 37 15 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Pest Management Practices, Percent of Acres Receiving Practice, Winter Wheat, 2004 (continued) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : States : Program Practice :-------------------: : TX : WA : States -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent of Acres : Prevention Practices: : : No-till/minimum till used : 11 16 28 Remove or plow down crop residue : 35 65 30 Clean implements after fieldwork : 30 39 40 Field edges/etc, chopped, mowed/etc. : 35 24 37 Water management practices : 6 5 1 : : Avoidance Practices: : : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 11 21 15 Rotate crops to control pests : 23 17 29 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 2 7 5 Crop variety chosen for pest resistance : 19 33 22 : : Monitoring Practices: : : Scouting by general observation : 54 27 49 Deliberate scouting activites : 19 72 31 Field was not scouted : 27 * 20 Established scouting process/insect trap used : 6 17 6 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : * 1 4 Scouting due to pest development model : 5 3 3 Scouted for weeds : 68 100 76 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 87 82 88 An employee : 11 1 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 2 17 7 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 3 Scouted for insects amd mites : 62 72 63 Scouting for insects/mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 98 81 90 An employee : 1 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 2 18 6 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 4 Scouted for diseases : 56 81 58 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 97 79 88 An employee : 1 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 3 20 7 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 4 Records kept to track pests : * 18 9 Field mapping of weed problem : * 8 3 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 7 2 3 Weather monitoring : 9 75 20 : : Suppression Practices: : : Biological pesticides : 1 2 * Scouting used to make decisions : 3 13 8 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 17 46 25 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 4 36 8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ Less than 0.5 percent Survey and Estimation Procedures Survey Procedures: Data for durum wheat, peanuts, soybeans, other spring wheat and winter wheat were collected on two 2004 surveys, the Agricultural Resources Management Survey (ARMS), which collected 4,727 usable records, and the Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP), which collected 2,232 usable records with commodities matching the ARMS survey. Data collecting for the ARMS survey occurred during the months of September through December 2004. Screening samples were drawn from the NASS List Sampling Frame. This extensive sampling frame covers all types of farms and accounts for approximately 82% of all land in farms in the U.S. All farms on the list had a possibility of being selected for the screening sample. Farms thought to have the crops of interest were more likely to be in the screening sample. Sampled farms were screened to determine if they grew the target crops in 2003. From this subpopulation of operations identified as producing a crop of interest, a subsample of farms was selected in such a way as to insure that each identified producer had an opportunity to be selected. In general, larger farms were more likely to be selected than smaller farms. Once a farm producing durum wheat, peanuts, soybeans, spring wheat and winter wheat was selected, one field was randomly selected from all the fields on the farm. The operator of the sampled field was personally interviewed to obtain information on chemical applications made to the selected field. Data and sampling procedures were similar for CEAP data collection, enumeration occurred from September to December 2004. Although CEAP was a nation-wide, area-based sample survey, only a subset of CEAP data was used in this publication. Specifically, only those CEAP samples that matched the ARMS crops and states were included. The fertilizer, pesticide, and pest management questions were similar in the CEAP and ARMS questionnaires. Estimation Procedures: The chemical application data, reported by product name or trade name, are reviewed within each State and across States for reasonableness and consistency. This review compares reported data with manufacturers' recommendations and with data from other farm operators using the same product. Following this review, product information is converted to an active ingredient level. The chemical usage estimates in this publication consist of survey estimates of those active ingredients. For this publication, detailed data within a table may not multiply across or add down due to independent rounding of the published values. Estimates of the total amount of active ingredient applied are based on the acreage estimates published in the annual NASS report "Crop Production - 2004 Summary" [Cr Pr 2-1(04)] for durum wheat, peanuts, soybeans, other spring wheat, and winter wheat. Please note that the estimates for total amount of an active ingredient applied will not be revised even if there are subsequent revisions to acreage for a given crop. Reliability Reliability: The surveys were designed so that the estimates are statistically representative of chemical use on the targeted crops in the surveyed States. The reliability of these survey results is affected by sampling variability and non-sampling errors. Since all operations producing the crops of interest are not included in the sample, survey estimates are subject to sampling variability. The sampling variability expressed as a percent of the estimate is called the coefficient of variation (cv). Sampling variability of the estimates differed considerably by chemical and crop. Variability for estimates of acres treated will be higher than the variability for estimates of application rates. This is because application rates have a narrower range of responses, are recommended by the manufacturer of the product, and are generally followed. In general, the more often the chemical was applied, the smaller the sampling variability. For example, estimates of a commonly used active ingredient such as Glyphosate isopropylamine salt, will exhibit less variability than a rarely used chemical. A commonly used active ingredient is defined as an active ingredient used on at least 40 percent of the acres planted for a crop at the US level. For these active ingredients, cv's range from 1 to 15 percent at the US level and 2 to 55 percent at the state level. Active ingredients that are less frequently used have cv's that range from 2 to 70. Terms and Definitions Active ingredient: Refers to the mechanism of action in pesticides which kills or controls the target pests. Usage data are reported by pesticide product and are converted to an amount of active ingredient. A single method of conversion has been chosen for active ingredients having more than one way of being converted. For example in this report, copper compounds are expressed in their metallic copper equivalent, and others such as 2,4-D and glyphosate are expressed in their acid equivalent. Allelopathic: The release of chemical compounds from a plant that will inhibit the growth of another plant, such as weeds. Application Rates: Refer to the average number of pounds of a fertilizer primary nutrient or pesticide active ingredient is applied to an acre of land. Rate per application is the average number of pounds applied per acre in one application. Rate per crop year is the average number of pounds applied per acre counting multiple applications. Number of applications is the average number of times a treated acre received a specific primary nutrient or active ingredient. Area applied: Represents the percentage of crop acres receiving one or more applications of a specific primary nutrient or active ingredient. This report does not contain acre treatments. However, acre treatments can be calculated by multiplying the acres planted by the percent of area applied and the average number of applications. Avoidance: May be practiced when pest populations exist in a field or site but the impact of the pest on the crop can be avoided through some cultural practice. Examples of avoidance tactics include crop rotation such that the crop of choice is not a host for the pest, choosing cultivars with genetic resistance to pests, using trap crops, choosing cultivars with maturity dates that may allow harvest before pest populations develop, fertilization programs to promote rapid crop development, and simply not planting certain areas of fields where pest populations are likely to cause crop failure. Some tactics for prevention and avoidance strategies may overlap. The following pest management questions were categorized as avoidance practices: Were planting or harvesting dates adjusted for this field to manage pests? Were crops rotated in this field during the past 3 years for the purpose of managing pests? Were planting locations planned to avoid infestation of pests? Was a trap crop grown to help manage insects in this field? Was a seed variety chosen to plant in this field because it had resistance to a specific pest? Beneficial Insects: Insects collected and introduced into locations because of their value in biologic control as prey on harmful insects and parasites. Chemigation: Application of an agricultural chemical by injecting it into irrigation water. Common name: An officially recognized name for an active ingredient. This report shows active ingredient by common name. Terms and Definitions (continued) Crop year: Refers to the period immediately following harvest of the previous crop through harvest of the current crop. Cultivar: A horticulturally or agriculturally derived variety of a plant, as distinguished from a natural variety. Farm: Any establishment from which $1,000 or more of agricultural products were sold or would normally be sold during the year. Government payments are included in sales. Places with all acreage enrolled in set aside or other government programs are considered operating. Fertilizer: Refers to applications of the primary nutrients; nitrogen, phosphate, and potash. Fungi: A lower form of parasitic plant life which often reduces crop production and/or lowers the grade quality of its host. Land in Farms: All land operated as part of a farming operation during the year. It includes crop and livestock acreage, wasteland, woodland, pasture, land in summer fallow, idle cropland, and land enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program and other set-aside, conservation, or commodity acreage programs. It excludes public, industrial, and grazing association land, and nonagricultural land. It excludes all land operated by establishments not qualifying as farms. Mechanism of Action (MOA): The method/biological pathway the pesticide uses to kill the pest. Monitoring: Includes proper identification of pests through systematic sampling or counting or other forms of scouting. Also, weather monitoring to predict levels of pest populations or to determine the most effective time to make pesticide applications, and soil testing where appropriate. The following pest management practices questions were categorized as monitoring practices: In 2003, how was this field primarily scouted for insects, weeds, diseases and/or beneficial organisms? (By conducting general observations while performing routine tasks? By deliberately going to the field specifically for scouting activities? This field was not scouted?) Was an established scouting process used (systematic sampling, recording counts, etc.) or were insect traps used in this field? Was scouting for pests done in this field due to a pest advisory warning? Was scouting for pests done in this field due to a pest development model? Was this field scouted for weeds? (If so, Who did the majority of the scouting? Operator, partner or family member, OR An employee, OR Farm supply or chemical dealer, OR Independent crop consultant or commercial scout?) Terms and Definitions (continued) Monitoring (continued): Was this field scouted for insects and mites? (If so, Who did the majority of the scouting? Operator, partner or family member, OR An employee, OR Farm supply or chemical dealer, OR Independent crop consultant or commercial scout?) Was this field scouted for diseases? (If so, Who did the majority of the scouting? Operator, partner or family member, OR An employee, OR Farm supply or chemical dealer, OR Independent crop consultant or commercial scout?) Were written or electronic records kept for this field to track the activity or numbers of weeds, insects or diseases? Was field mapping data used for making weed management decisions on this field? Were the services of a diagnostic laboratory used for pest identification or soil or plant tissue pest analysis for this field? Was weather data used to assist in determining either the need or when to make pesticide applications? Were floral lures, attractants, repellants, pheromone traps or other biological pest controls used on this field? Nematodes: Microscopic, worm-shaped parasitic animals. Damage to many crops can be severe. Pesticides: As defined by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), pesticides include any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying, repelling or mitigating any pest, and any substance or mixture of substances intended for use as a plant regulator, defoliant, or desiccant. The four classes of pesticides presented in this report and the pests targeted are: herbicides - weeds, insecticides - insects, fungicides - fungi, and other chemicals - other forms of life. Miticides and nematicides are included as insecticides while soil fumigants, growth regulators, defoliants, and desiccants are included as other chemicals. Pheromone: A chemical substance produced by an insect which serves as a stimulus to other individuals of the same species for one or more behavioral responses. Terms and Definitions (continued) Prevention: The practice of keeping a pest population from infesting a crop or field. It includes such tactics as using pest-free seeds or transplants, alternative tillage approaches such as no-till or strip-till systems, choosing cultivars with genetic resistance to insects or disease, irrigation scheduling to avoid situations conducive to disease development, cleaning tillage and harvesting equipment between fields or operations, using field sanitation procedures, and eliminating alternate hosts or sites for insect pests and disease organisms. The following pest management questions were categorized as prevention practices: Were field edges, lanes, ditches, roadways or fence lines chopped, mowed, plowed, or burned to manage pests for this field? Were crop residues plowed down or removed in this field to manage pests? Were equipment and implements cleaned after completing field work in this field to reduce the spread of pests? Were water management practices such as irrigation scheduling, controlled drainage, or treatment of retention water used on this field to manage pests? Was this field cultivated for weed control during the growing season? Was no-till or minimum till used to manage pests in this field? Suppression: Tactics include cultural practices such as narrow row spacings or optimized in-row plant populations, using cover crops or mulches, or using crops with allelopathic potential in the rotation. Physical suppression tactics may include cultivation or mowing for weed control, baited or pheromone traps for certain insects, and temperature management or exclusion devices for insect and disease management. Biological pesticides and controls, including mating disruption for insects, can be considered as alternatives to conventional pesticides. Determining pest thresholds and alternating pesticide active ingredients to avoid resistance buildup are suppression methods which minimize pesticide use. The following questions were categorized as suppression practices: Was scouting data compared to published information on infestation thresholds to determine when to take measures to manage pests in this field? Were any biological pesticides such as Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis), insect growth regulators (Courier, Intrepid, etc.) neem or other natural/biological based products sprayed or applied to manage pests in this field? Were any beneficial organisms (insects, nematodes, fungi) applied or released in this field to manage pests? Were ground covers, mulches, or other physical barriers maintained for this field to manage pest problems? Was row spacing or plant density adjusted in this field to manage pests? Were pesticides with different mechanisms of action rotated or tank mixed for the primary purpose of keeping pests from becoming resistant to pesticides? Trade name: A trademark name given to a specific formulation of a pesticide product. A formulation contains a specific concentration of the active ingredient, carrier materials, and other ingredients such as emulsifiers and wetting agents. Trade Names, Common Names, and Classes The following is a list showing common name, associated class, and trade name of active ingredients in this publication. The classes are herbicides (H), insecticides (I), fungicides (F), and other chemicals (O). This list is provided as an aid in reviewing pesticide data. Pre-mixes are not cataloged. The list is not complete for all pesticides used on durum wheat, peanuts, soybeans, spring wheat and winter wheat and NASS does not mean to imply use of any specific trade name. Class Common Name Trade Name H 2,4-D Agsco, Amine, Barrage, Class, Clean Crop Low Vol, Curtail, Ded-Weed Sulv, Envy, Grazon P+D, Hi-Dep, Landmaster, LV 6, Riverside, RT Master, Salvo, Tiller, Turret, Unison, Weed Rhap, Weedar, Weedmaster, Weedone H 2,4-D Dimeth. salt Banvel + 2,4-D, Riverdale Triplet Selective, Saber, Savage, Weedar H 2,4-DB,Dimeth. salt Butoxone, Butyrac H 2,4-DP, Dimeth. salt Amine H 3-Pyridinecarb. acid Cadre I Acephate Orthene H Acetamide Axiom, Define, Domain H Acetic acid Agsco, Esteron, Double Up B+D, LV 4 2,4-D Ester, LV 400 2,4-D Weed Killer, Maestro D, Outlaw, Salvan, Starane + Salvo, Weedone H Acetochlor Field Master, Harness H Acifluorfen Blazer, Conclude Ultra B&G, Galaxy, Storm, Ultra Blazer H Alachlor Arrow, Bronco, Freedom, Intrro, Lasso, Micro-Tech, Partner I Aldicarb Temik H Atrazine Aatrex, Aatrex Nine-O, Atrazine, Bicep, Bicep II, Bicep II Magnum, Buctril + Atrazine, Cinch ATZ, Field Master, Guardsman Max, Harness Xtra, Laddok I Azinphos-methyl Guthion F Azoxystrobin Quadris (Abound), Quilt H Barban Carbyne F Basic copper sulfate Microcop H Benefin XL 2G H Bentazon Basagran, Conclude Ultra, Galaxy, Laddok, Pledge, Rezult, Storm I Benzoic acid Intrepid I Bifenthrin Capture F Boscalid Endura H Bromoxynil Agsco, Bromox/MCPA, Bronate, Buctril, Buctril + Atrazine, Rhino H Bromoxynil octanoate Bronate Advanced, Connect, Double Up B+D, Maestro D, WildCard Xtra I Bt (Bacillus thur.) Xentari Biological Insecticide H Butoxy. ester 2,4-D 2,4-D/Weedone LV6 I Carbaryl Sevin I Carbofuran Furadan H Carfentrazone-ethyl AIM, Affinity, Avalanche I Chlorfenapyr Pirate H Chlorimuron-ethyl Authority, Canopy, Classic, Synchrony O Chloropicrin Telone F Chlorothalonil Bravo, Chlorothalonil Plus Zinc, Echo, Tilt/Bravo I Chlorpyrifos Chlorpyrifos, Govern, Lorsban, Nufos H Chlorsulfuron Finesse, Glean H Clethodim Arrow, Prism, Select H Clodinafop-propargil Discover H Clomazone Command H Clopyralid Curtail, Stinger, WideMatch H Cloransulam-methyl Amplify, FirstRate, Gangster, Gauntlet H Colletot. gloeospor Collego (fungal spores) F Copper hydroxide Kocide I Cyfluthrin Baythroid I Cypermethrin Ammo, Battery H Dicamba Banvel, Banvel + 2,4-D, Clarity, Fallow Master, Oracle Dicamba, Outlaw, Rave, Weedmaster H Dicamba, Dime. salt Riverdale Triplet Selective, Sterling H Dicamba, Sodium Salt Dicamba O Dichloropropene Telone H Dichlorprop Weedone H Diclofop-methyl Hoelon H Diclosulam Strongarm H Difenzoquat Avenge H Dimethenamid Frontier H Dimethenamid-P Guardsman Max, Outlook I Dimethoate Dimethoate I Disulfoton Di-Syston H Diuron Diuron, Karmex, Surefire I Endosulfan Methyl Parathion + Thiodan I Esfenvalerate Asana H Ethalfluralin Sonalan O Ethephon Cerone, Ethephon H Ethofumesate Nortron I Ethyl parathion Parathion H Fenoxaprop Cheyenne, Fusion, Puma, Silverado, Tiller I Fipronil Regent H Fluazifop-P-butyl Fusilade, Fusion, Typhoon F Fluazinam Omega H Flucarbazone-sodium Everest F Fludioxonil Maxim H Flumetsulam Python H Fomesafen Flexstar, Reflex, Typhoon O Garlic oil Guardian Spray H Glufosinate-ammonium Liberty H Glyphosate Accord, Backdraft, Bronco, Buccaneer, Clear-Out, Cornerstone, Credit, Extreme, Fallow Master, Field Master, Gly Star, Gly-Flo, Glyfos, Glyphomax, Glyphosate, Honcho, Landmaster, Mad Dog Glyphosate, Mirage, Protocol, Ranger, Rattler, Roundup, RT Master H Glyphosate diam. salt Sequence, Touchdown H Imazamethabenz Assert H Imazamox Beyond, Raptor H Imazaquin Backdraft, Scepter, Squadron, Steel H Imazethapyr Extreme, Pursuit, Steel I Imidacloprid Provado H Lactofen Cobra, Phoenix, Stellar I Lambda-cyhalothrin Karate, Warrior H Linuron Lorox I Malathion Malathion F Mancozeb Manzate, Penncozeb F Maneb Manex H MCPA Bromox, Bronate, Cheyenne, Chiptox MCPA, Class MCPA, Curtail, Dagger, MCP Ester, MCP Amine, Rhino, Rhonox, Starane + Sword, Sword, Weed Rhap, Weedone MCPA Ester, WildCard H MCPA, dimethyl. salt MCPA Amine H MCPA-EHE WideMatch, WildCard Xtra F Mefenoxam Maxim, Ridomil Gold H Mesosulfuron-Methyl Osprey H Mesotrione Callisto F Metalaxyl Ridomil O Metaldehyde Deadline M-Ps O Metam-sodium Metam Sodium, Vapam I Methomyl Lannate I Methyl parathion Methyl Parathion, Methyl Parathion + Thiodan, Penncap-M H Metolachlor Bicep, Dual, Turbo H Metribuzin Axiom, Boundary, Canopy, Domain, Lexone, Sencor, Turbo H Metsulfuron-methyl Ally, Canvas, Finesse, Valuron H Nicosulfuron Steadfast H Norflurazon Zorial H Oryzalin XL 2G H Paraquat Gramoxone, Gramoxone/Cyclone, Starfire, Surefire F PCNB Ridomil Gold H Pendimethalin Pendimax, Prowl, Pursuit, Squadron, Steel I Permethrin Permethrin, Pounce I Phorate Phorate, Thimet H Picloram Grazon P+D, Tordon H Flumiclorac-pentyl Resource, Stellar H Flumioxazin Gangster, Valor H Fluroxypyr Starane H Fluroxypyr 1-methyl Starane + Sword, Starane + Salvo, WideMatch F Flutolanil Artisan, Moncut H Primisulfuron Exceed I Profenofos Curacron H Propanil Prop-Job H Propanoic acid Riverdale Triplet Selective I Propargite Comite F Propiconazole Artisan Peanut, Bravo, Bumper, PropiMax, Quilt Stratego, Tilt H Prosulfuron Exceed, Peak F Pyraclostrobin Headline H Pyridinecarboxylic acid Cadre H Quinclorac Paramount H Quizalofop-ethyl Assure H Quizalofop-P-ethyl Assure H Rimsulfuron Steadfast H Sethoxydim Conclude Ultra B&G, Poast, Rezult H Simazine Princep H S-Metolachlor Bicep II Magnum, Boundary, Cinch ATZ, Dual II Magnum, Sequence I Spinosad Tracer H Sulfentrazone Authority, Blanket, Canopy, Command Xtra, Gauntlet, Spartan H Sulfosate Touchdown H Sulfosulfuron Maverick F Sulfur Bravo S, Sulfur, Sul-Preme F Tebuconazole Folicur I Thiamethoxam Platinum H Thifensulfuron Ally Extra, Canvas, Harmony, Pinnacle, Synchrony,X-TRA (Cheyenne) F Thiophanate-methyl Tilt Plus, Topsin F Thiram Thiram H Tralkoxydim Achieve F Triadimefon Bayleton T&O H Triallate Buckle, Far-Go H Triasulfuron Amber, Rave H Tribenuron-methyl Ally Extra, Canvas, Express, Harmony, X-TRA (Cheyenne) H Triclopyr Remedy F Trifloxystrobin Stratego H Trifluralin Buckle, Freedom, Treflan, Tri-4, Trifluralin, Trilin, Trust I Zeta-cypermethrin Fury, Mustang Report Features Released May 18, 2005 by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on "Agricultural Chemical Usage" call Kristi Kubista-Hovis (202) 720-5581, office hours 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET. Listed below are persons within the National Agricultural Statistics Service to contact for additional information. Kristi Kubista-Hovis, Environmental Statistician (202) 720-5581 Sarah Hoffman, Head, Environmental and Demographics Section (202) 720-0684 Linda Hutton, Chief, Environmental, Economics, and Demographics Branch (202) 720-6146 ACCESS TO REPORTS!! For your convenience, there are several ways to obtain NASS reports, data products, and services: INTERNET ACCESS All NASS reports are available free of charge on the worldwide Internet. For access, connect to the Internet and go to the NASS Home Page at: www.usda.gov/nass/. Select "Today's Reports" or Publications and then Reports Calendar or Publications and then Search, by Title or Subject. E-MAIL SUBSCRIPTION All NASS reports are available by subscription free of charge direct to your e-mail address. Starting with the NASS Home Page at www.usda.gov/nass/, click on Publications, then click on the Subscribe by E-mail button which takes you to the page describing e-mail delivery of reports. Finally, click on Go to the Subscription Page and follow the instructions. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRINTED REPORTS OR DATA PRODUCTS CALL OUR TOLL-FREE ORDER DESK: 800-999-6779 (U.S. and Canada) Other areas, please call 703-605-6220 FAX: 703-605-6900 (Visa, MasterCard, check, or money order acceptable for payment.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ASSISTANCE For assistance with general agricultural statistics or further information about NASS or its products or services, contact the Agricultural Statistics Hotline at 800-727-9540, 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET, or e-mail: nass@nass.usda.gov. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.